Search

Eastern Indian Ocean pygmy blue (EIOPB) whales were localised and tracked through the Perth Canyon area utilising a passive acoustic tracking array. Vocalising animals were tracked using the Type II unit of the EIOPB whale song across recordings for an average of 109.3 min (95% CI ± 27 min), suggesting that animals move slowly through the array area. Comparisons of the distribution of animals between sample years revealed non-uniform distribution of animals suggesting that environmental variables may drive pygmy blue whale spatial distribution within foraging areas. Analysis of the movement patterns of acoustically tracked animals found that animals tracked between January and early March generally exhibited directional movement while singing animals tracked between March and May exhibited directional and milling movement patterns, indicating that they may be foraging, and thus that animals may sing between feeding bouts. Comparisons of visual and acoustic localisations found animals appeared to utilise similar areas around the passive acoustic receiver array on days where survey effort overlapped, though acoustic survey methods returned consistently higher numbers of detections. Further, acoustic and visual detections of animals within the same day were not within the same location highlighting the need for holistic studies of species habitat utilisation. The inclusion of in-situ environmental data collection in the design of future acoustic tracking studies would be valuable to understand whether there is a link between environmental factors at the local scale and the localised movement of whales around the listening area. • Whales were tracked around a passive acoustic array by localising their signals. • Early in the season animals exhibited more directional movement patterns. • Later in the season animals spent more time milling. • Animals may balance behavioural trade-offs by singing between foraging bouts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]