Search

This study evaluated whether Arnarson and Craighead's (2009, 2011) developmentally based behavioral and cognitive program that prevented the initial episode of depressive disorders among Icelandic adolescents could be adapted to prevent depressive disorders among "at-risk" Portuguese adolescents. One hundred sixty-eight Portuguese mid-adolescents (primarily 14 to 15 years old), who had subsyndromal symptoms of depression but who had never met criteria for a depressive disorder, were identified by classroom screening with the CDI and subsequent K-SADS-PL interview. All 168 adolescents were offered participation in the 14-week prevention program; 70 agreed to participate in the program, and 98 agreed to participate only in an assessment control group. Psychological disorders were evaluated at baseline, 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month assessments. During the 2-year follow-up period, 12 students in the assessment-only group experienced an initial depressive disorder versus 2 in the prevention group. Survival analyses indicated a significantly lower rate of initial episodes of depressive disorders, χ2(1) = 4.261, p = .039, among the prevention group participants compared to the assessment only comparison group. The hazard ratio was .207, and the NNT was 11. Survival analyses indicated no significant differences between the prevention condition and the assessment only condition in the occurrence of other psychiatric disorders, χ2(1) = 1.080, p =.299. The findings indicate the program can be successfully adapted for use in Portuguese schools, and they provide a preliminary indication that those "at-risk" adolescents who chose to participate in the program, compared to those who chose to participate only in the assessments, developed fewer initial episodes of depressive disorders over the course of 24 months. The program effects were similar to the outcomes of the prior study of this program in Iceland. As in the Icelandic version of the program, its effects appeared to be specific to the depressive disorders for which the program was designed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a prevalent mental health condition that often begins in adolescence, with significant long-term implications. Indicated prevention programs targeting adolescents with mild symptoms have shown efficacy, yet the methods for identifying at-risk individuals need improvement. This study aims to evaluate the utility of Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) in predicting the onset of MDD among non-depressed adolescents, compared to traditional screening methods. The study recruited 1462 Portuguese adolescents aged 13-16, who were assessed using various self-report measures and followed for two years. Participants were randomly divided into training (70%, N = 1023) and testing (30%, N = 439) samples. PLSR models were developed to predict the occurrence of a major depressive episode (MDE) within two years, using 331 variables. The model's performance was compared to the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) in predicting MDE onset. The best-fitting PLSR model with two components explained 19.1% and 16.9% of the variance in the training and testing samples, respectively, significantly outperforming the CDI, which explained 7.7% of the variance. The area under the ROC curve was 0.78 for PLSR, compared to 0.71 for CDI. An empirically derived cut-off point was used to create dichotomous risk categories, and it showed a significant difference in MDE rates between predicted high-risk and low-risk groups. The balanced accuracy of the PLSR model was 0.77, compared to 0.65 for the CDI method. The PLSR model effectively identified adolescents at risk for developing MDD, demonstrating superior predictive power over the CDI. This study supports the potential utility of ML techniques (e.g., PLSR) in enhancing early identification and prevention efforts for adolescent depression., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Edward Craighead reports financial support was provided by Fuqua Family Foundations. Edward Craighead, Ana Paula Matos reports financial support was provided by Foundation for Science and Technology. Edward Craighead reports financial support was provided by Realan Foundation. Edward Craighead reports a relationship with George West Mental Health Foundation that includes: board membership. Edward Craighead reports a relationship with Hugarheill ehf that includes: board membership. Edward Craighead reports a relationship with AIM for Mental Health that includes: board membership. Edward Craighead reports a relationship with Anxiety and Depression Association of America that includes: board membership. Edward Craighead reports a relationship with Mary and John Brock Foundation that includes: funding grants. Edward Craighead reports a relationship with Pitts Foundation that includes: funding grants. Edward Craighead reports a relationship with Fuqua Family Foundation that includes: funding grants. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

This study examined the test-retest reliability, consensual, convergent and divergent validities, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of the Portuguese version of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime version (K-SADS-PL). Eighty-nine children/adolescents (65 psychiatric outpatients and 24 healthy controls) were interviewed with K-SADS-PL and completed measures of depressive and anxiety symptoms. The child's parent/caretaker completed the Child Behavior Checklist. Good to excellent values were obtained for test-retest reliability and consensual validity. For the convergent validity, moderate correlations between the K-SADS-PL and the corresponding self-report measures were observed. Divergent validity was acceptable for the K-SADS-PL diagnoses. The lowest values of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the K-SADS-PL were 88, 88, and 91, respectively. The Portuguese version of K-SADS-PL proved to be a valid and reliable assessment instrument for children and adolescents, and was sensitive, specific and accurate when diagnosing mood, anxiety, adjustment, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)