Search

Summary: Background. Drug hypersensitivity reactions are presumably immune-mediated reactions that cause reproducible signs and/or symptoms. Overdiagnosis of drug allergy, frequently self-reported, is common and carries significant limitations. We intended to analyze the frequency and impact of drug allergy in hospitalized patients. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted in an Internal Medicine ward at a tertiary hospital in Portugal. All patients with a drug allergy report admitted within a 3-year period were included. Data were collected from their electronic medical records. Results. We found that 15.4% of patients had a report of drug allergy, with antibiotics being the most common (56.4%), followed by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (21.7%) and radiocontrast media (7.0%). The allergy report affected the clinical approach of 14.5% of patients by motivating the use of second-line agents, or the eviction of necessary procedures. The usage of alternative antibiotics entailed a cost increase of 2.4 times. There were 14.7% of patients to whom the suspected drug was administered: 87.0% tolerated and 13.0% developed a reaction. Only 1.9% were referred to our Allergy and Clinical Immunology department and proceeded in their allergy study. Conclusions. In this study, a considerable number of patients had a drug allergy label on their records. This label contributed to an increase in the cost of treatment, or the avoidance of necessary exams. However, disregarding an allergy record may lead to potentially life-threatening reactions that proper risk assessment could avoid. Further investigation should always be part of the follow-up routine of these patients, and better articulation between departments should be encouraged.

Summary: Background. Drug hypersensitivity in children impacts the quality of life of the patients and their caregivers. The parent-reported drug hypersensitivity quality of life questionnaire (P-DrHy-Q), the first disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for caregivers who have children with drug hypersensitivity, was recently developed. The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the portuguese version of the P-DrHy-Q. Methods. A translation of the Parent-reported Drug Hypersensitivity Quality of Life Questionnaire (P-DrHy-Q) to the Portuguese population was performed, assessing its applicability in 74 caregivers from two allergy departments. The analyses included internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test-retest reliability: 14 caregivers completed the P-DrHy-Q without any intervention one week after answering the first questionnaire. Results. The 12-item scale assessed the mental health and social activity. The internal consistency of the scale was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.884) and the test-retest associations were excelent (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.985; p < 0.001). The mean value of the questionnaire was 37.01 (SD 18.57) with Mental Health being more affected than Social Activity. Employed caregivers had a significant higher score (p < 0.001). No other factor was statistically significant. Conclusions. The Portuguese version of the P-DrHy-Q is valid for evaluating quality of life impairment in Portuguese caregivers of children with drug hypersensitivity. Its application might be relevant for future research and provide clinicians and researchers with a tool to define which psychosocial support is required to provide more comprehensive care in drug hypersensitivity.

Summary: Background. The aim of the study was to learn about perception of drug allergy by general practitioners (GP) from continental Portugal, identify difficulties and educational needs for its management. Methods. A total of 372 answers were obtained. A questionnaire was addressed to GPs. Results. The most commonly identified drugs were antibiotics for 65.3% of the GPs and skin was the most commonly affected organ for 65.8%. Drug allergy was considered as very important in clinical practice by 73.7%, but difficulties in recognizing it were stated by 70.2%. Further education in this field wouldbe welcome by 97.8% of the doctors. The collaboration of Immunoallergology centers was considered non satisfactory by 39.8% of GPs and 45.7% of them stated that two-thirds of the suspected reactions were not investigated. Conclusions. These points deserve consideration in future health educational and organizational strategies.

Summary: Objectives. To describe clinical manifestations and performed diagnostic workup, focusing drug challenge tests (DCT), in patients with drug allergy. Methods. Retrospective study including all patients with skin tests (STs) or DCT-based drug allergy diagnosis, between 01/2014 - 06/2018 in a Portuguese allergy unit. Data were collected from electronic and paper-based clinical records. Results. We had 75 drug allergy diagnoses. Most index reactions were mild and major or equal 1 hour after drug intake. 59 (78%) diagnoses were based on DCTs, all based on multistep protocols with major or equal 3 predicted steps. Only 10% of the DCT were positive during up-dosing; timing and severity of the index reaction predicted DCT interruption during up-dosing. Conclusions. Most drug allergy diagnoses were based on multistep DCT. The identified predictors of DCT interruption during up-dosing can support the development of more personalized DCTs protocols.

Summary: Background and Objective. Drug-induced anaphylaxis (DIA) is the most common cause of fatal anaphylaxis. We aimed to characterize patients with DIA and their allergological workup. Methods. Systematic review of patients with history of DIA referred to our center over 7 years. Results. Included 125 patients (10% pediatric age), being 36 years the median age of first episode (from 1 to 74 years). The main culprits were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (43%), antibiotics (42%) and anesthetic agents (6%). In 24% the reactions occurred in hospital setting and 14% perioperative. The etiology was confirmed in 75% through allergological workup. Conclusions. NSAIDs and antibiotics were responsible for most of DIA. The heterogeneity of mechanisms, the severity of the reactions and the lack of standardized in vivo and/or in vitro tests for some drugs do not allow to confirm the diagnosis in all cases. Patients with DIA should be evaluated in specialized centers to perform accurate diagnosis, to prevent recurrence and to find safe alternatives.

Introduction: There are rather few publications about hypersensitivity reactions to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) in the paediatric age. In this study, we aimed to assess the frequency of confirmed NSAID hypersensitivity in children with a previous reported reaction to NSAID in order to investigate the role of the drug provocation test (DPT) in the diagnostic workup and to explore the factors associated with confirmed NSAID hypersensitivity., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the clinical files from every patient under 18 years old who attended two Portuguese paediatric allergy outpatient clinics, from January 2009 to August 2014, due to a suspected NSAID hypersensitivity., Results: We included 119 patients, with a median age of nine years (P 25 -P 75 : 5-14). Ibuprofen was the commonest implicated NSAID in the patients' reports (n=94-79%). After DPT, NSAID hypersensitivity was confirmed in nine (7.6%) patients, excluded in 93 (78.2%) and was inconclusive in 17 (14.3%). In the majority (n=95-79.8%), the reaction occurred in the first 24h after intake. Eighty-four patients (70.6%) reported only cutaneous manifestations and 18 (15.1%) had systemic symptoms. Anaphylaxis represented a relative risk to NSAID hypersensitivity confirmation. No association was found for atopy and the number of previous reactions., Conclusion: In our study, NSAID hypersensitivity was confirmed in a small proportion of the patients with a previous reported reaction. Ibuprofen was the most implicated drug with urticaria/angio-oedema as the commonest manifestation. Anaphylaxis was associated with confirmed drug hypersensitivity. The drug provocation test was essential to establish the diagnosis., (Copyright © 2016 SEICAP. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To determine the frequency of anaphylaxis in an allergy outpatient department, allowing a better understanding regarding aetiology, clinical manifestations and management, in children and adolescents., Methods: From among 3646 patients up to 18 years old observed during one-year period, we included those with history of anaphylaxis reported by allergists., Results: Sixty-four children had history of anaphylaxis (prevalence of 1.8%), with mean age 8.1±5.5 years, 61% being male. Median age of the first anaphylactic episode was 3 years (1 month-17 years). The majority of patients had food-induced anaphylaxis (84%): milk 22, egg 7, peanut 6, tree nuts 6, fresh fruits 6, crustaceans 4, fish 4 and wheat 2. Food-associated exercise-induced anaphylaxis was reported in 2 adolescents. Drug-induced anaphylaxis occurred in 8%: 4 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and 1 amoxicillin. Three children had cold-induced anaphylaxis, one adolescent had anaphylaxis to latex and one child had anaphylaxis to insect sting. The majority (73%) had no previous diagnosis of the etiologic factor. Symptoms reported were mainly mucocutaneous (94%) and respiratory (84%), followed by gastrointestinal (42%) and cardiovascular (25%). Fifty-one patients were admitted to the emergency department, although only 33% were treated with epinephrine. Recurrence of anaphylaxis occurred in 26 patients (3 or more episodes in 14)., Conclusions: In our paediatric population, the main triggering agent of anaphylaxis was IgE-mediated food allergy. Epinephrine is underused, as reported by others. Often, children have several episodes before being assessed by an allergist. We stress the importance of systematic notification and improvement of educational programmes in order to achieve a better preventive and therapeutic management of this life-threatening entity.

Purpose: Anaphylaxis is a potentially fatal systemic adverse drug reaction (ADR). It is an unpredictable and mostly dose-independent event that occurs suddenly following exposure to the causative drug. Our objective was to characterize a case series of anaphylactic reactions reported to the Portuguese Pharmacovigilance authority during the past decade. Patients' demographic data and implicated drugs were analyzed as well as the severity of the ADR and time trends., Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of episodes of anaphylaxis, defined according to the Second Symposium on the Definition and Management of Anaphylaxis Criteria, reported to the Portuguese Pharmacovigilance System between 1 January 2000 and 1 November 2010, Results: Amongst the 16,157 ADR reported to the Portuguese Pharmacovigilance System during the 10-year study period, we found 918 (6 %) cases of anaphylaxis that met the proposed criteria. The age of the patients varied from 7 days to 91 years, with 87 cases (9 %) of anaphylaxis involving patients under 18 years of age. There was an overall female predominance (67 %), but the majority of pediatric patients were male (56 %). There was a trend toward increased reporting as the decade progressed, and 31 % (284) of all anaphylaxis cases were reported during the last 2 years of the study period. Of the anaphylaxis episodes reported, 19 % led to hospitalization and 24 (3 %) had a fatal outcome. Antibiotics were responsible for most cases (17 %) followed by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs/acetaminophen (13 %), antineoplastic/cytotoxic drugs and immune-modulators. Vaccines and radiographic contrast media were also important contributors to an anaphylactic event., Conclusions: In this series of drug-related anaphylaxis, we found that most of the reported episodes were associated with widely used drugs, such as antibiotics and analgesics. Anaphylaxis can occur at any age. The female gender was more highly represented, with the exception of pediatric patients.

Background: Few studies have been performed in children with suspected betalactam allergy. We aimed to assess the role of the drug provocation test (DPT) with betalactams in a paediatric setting and to study the association between allergy to betalactam antibiotics and other allergic diseases., Methods: We included all the patients under 15 years old who were consecutively referred to the Immunoallergy Department, Dona Estefânia Hospital, Portugal (January 2002 to April 2008) for a compatible history of allergic reaction to betalactam. All were submitted to a DPT. Children were proposed to perform skin tests (ST) to betalactam antibiotics followed by DPT. If they decline ST, a DPT with the culprit drug was performed., Results: We studied 161 children, 60% were boys, with a median age of 5 years old at the time of the DPT. Thirty-three patients (20.5%) had an immediate reaction and 33 (20.5%) a non-immediate reaction. The severity of the reported reactions was low in most cases. Skin tests to betalactams were performed in 47 children and were positive in 8. DPT was positive in only one (3.4%) of the patients skin tested and in 11 (13.4%) of those not skin tested. The severity of the DPT reaction was low. Asthma and food allergy were associated with a positive DPT in the later group., Conclusions: DPT seems a safe procedure even in the absence of ST in non-severe cases. This could be a practical option in infants and pre-school children, where ST are painful and difficult to perform. Additional caution should be taken in children with asthma and food allergy., (Copyright © 2009 SEICAP. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.)

The prevalence of drug allergy in an out-patient population has been studied, 448 cases were diagnosed mainly to NSAIDS and beta-lactams and local anesthetics, sulfa drugs, quinolones and others. Clinical history and skin tests are sufficient to diagnose most cases of drug allergy.