Search

Objective To evaluate the benefits of radiation education with and without feedback reporting in altering clinician radiation use behaviour in performing coronary angiography (CA). Design A retrospective review of radiation use (fluoroscopy time) in coronary angiograms performed between July 1996 and December 2005 by 10 cardiologists to assess the impact of various interventions aimed at minimizing radiation risk. The impact of interventions such as education and audit/feedback was correlated against radiation use using cumulative sum and cumulative expected minus observed charts. Setting Private Hospital in Brisbane, Australia. Participants Ten cardiologists. Intervention Education and audit/feedback. Results Baseline radiation use subject to standard guidelines was stable. Group performance charts show a modest transient improvement in radiation use associated with an education intervention alone. However, regular detailed personalized feedback comparing an individual's radiation use to group and external benchmarks was successful in achieving sustained reduction in overall radiation use. For individual participants, significant improvement was noted in 7 of 10 cardiologists. Conclusion Although an improved theoretical understanding of effective radiation hygiene strategies might contribute to reduced radiation use, this study suggests that regular detailed quantitative feedback supporting education is an effective tool in altering radiation use in CA. Understanding triggers that stimulate change in clinician behaviour is critical to the design of systems to optimize clinical performance. Confidentially reported benchmarking systems may be a useful tool to alter clinician behaviour. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Closed-loop electronic medication management systems (EMMS) are recognised as an effective intervention to improve medication safety, yet evidence of their effectiveness in hospitals is limited. Few studies have compared medication turnaround time for a closed-loop electronic versus paper-based medication management environment., Objective: To compare medication turnaround times in a paper-based hospital environment with a digital hospital equipped with a closed-loop EMMS, consisting of computerised physician order entry, profiled automated dispensing cabinets packaged with unit dose medications and barcode medication administration., Method: Data were collected during 2 weeks at three private hospital sites (one with closed-loop EMMS) within the same organisation network in Queensland, Australia. Time between scheduled and actual administration times was analysed for first dose of time-critical and non-critical medications located on the ward or sourced via pharmacy., Key Findings: Medication turnaround times at the EMMS site were less compared to the paper-based sites (median, IQR: 35 min, 8-57 min versus 120 min, 30-180 min, P < 0.001). For time-critical medications, 77% were administered within 60 min of scheduled time at the EMMS site versus 38% for the paper-based sites. Similar difference was observed for non-critical medications, 80% were administered within 60 min of their scheduled time at the EMMS site versus 41% at the paper-based facilities., Conclusion: The study indicates medication turnaround times utilising a closed-loop EMMS are less compared to paper-based systems. This improvement may be attributable to increased accessibility of medications using automated dispensing cabinets and electronic medication administration records flagging tasks to nurses in real time., (© 2018 Royal Pharmaceutical Society.)