Search

Background: BRCA testing is necessary for establishing a management strategy for ovarian cancer. Several BRCA testing strategies, including germline and somatic testing, are implemented in clinical practice in Korea. We aimed to comparatively evaluate their cost-effectiveness from patients' perspective., Methods: We developed a decision model comprising five BRCA testing strategies implemented in Korea: (1) germline testing first, followed by somatic tumor testing for patients without a germline variant; (2) somatic testing first, followed by germline testing for patients with a variant detected by somatic testing; (3) both germline and somatic testing; (4) germline testing alone; and (5) somatic testing alone, with no testing as the comparator. One-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to test the uncertainty of key parameters., Results: Assuming a willingness-to-pay of $20,000 per progression-free life-year gain (PF-LYG), all five strategies were considered cost-effective. Strategy 4 was the most cost-effective option, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $2,547.7 per PF-LYG, followed by strategy 1, with an ICER of $3,978.4 per PF-LYG. Even when the parameter values were varied within the possible range, the ICERs of all strategies did not exceed the willingness-to-pay threshold., Conclusions: Considering the importance of knowing a patient's BRCA gene status, germline testing first, followed by somatic testing, may be a reasonable option.

Purpose: Prostate cancer is one of the most heritable cancers and prostate cancer with germline mutations is associated with aggressive features and a poor prognosis. We investigated germline variants in unselected Korean men with prostate cancer., Materials and Methods: In this study, we prospectively collected buccal swab DNA from 120 unselected Korean men with prostate cancer, and performed massively parallel sequencing. Identified germline variants were interpreted according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology 2015 guidelines., Results: Of the 120 patients, 30 had regional or metastatic disease and 10, 34, 25, and 21 patients were categorized as having low, intermediate, high, or very high-risk disease, respectively. Of the 88 germline variants, 6 pathologic or likely pathogenic variants were identified in 7 patients (5.8%) with BRCA2 (1.7%), HOXB13 (1.7%), PALB2 (0.8%), ATM (0.8%), and MSH2 (0.8%). Of 7 patients, 2 possessed intermediate risk disease that was not included in the recommendation for genetic testing. We identified the Gly132Glu variant, which was different from the Gly84Glu variant of the HOXB13 gene in Western populations., Conclusions: This study presents the first analysis of germline variants in unselected Korean men with prostate cancer. Our results showed comparable germline prevalence with previous studies and provides evidence for the necessity of genetic testing in Korean men with prostate cancer., Competing Interests: The authors have nothing to disclose., (© The Korean Urological Association.)