1. Economic evaluation of the hospitalist care model in an acute medical unit: a benefit-cost analysis.
- Author
-
Kim HJ, Kim J, Ohn JH, and Kim NH
- Subjects
- Humans, Retrospective Studies, Republic of Korea, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, Tertiary Care Centers economics, Hospital Costs statistics & numerical data, Adult, Hospitalists economics, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Length of Stay economics, Length of Stay statistics & numerical data, Emergency Service, Hospital economics, Emergency Service, Hospital statistics & numerical data, Hospital Mortality
- Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to assess the economic efficiency of the acute medical unit (AMU) hospitalist care model, utilising patient outcomes (length of hospital stay, emergency department (ED)-length of hospital stay, in-hospital mortality) from a previous investigation., Design: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using benefit-cost analysis from a societal perspective. Data relating to clinical factors, outcomes and medical costs were obtained from the electronic medical record database at our institution. Literature-based costing was applied to determine direct non-medical costs and indirect costs that could not be obtained directly., Setting: A tertiary care hospital in the Republic of Korea., Participants: We evaluated 6391 medical inpatients admitted through the ED from 1 June 2016 to 31 May 2017., Interventions: The study compared multiple types of costs and benefits among inpatients from the ED between a non-hospitalist group and an AMU hospitalist group. Results This investigation found a significant reduction in medical costs and total costs in the AMU hospitalist group compared to the non-hospitalist group (30% reduction, 95% CI: 27.6-32.1%, P =0.000; 29.3% reduction, 95% CI: 27.0-31.5%, P =0.000; respectively). Furthermore, significant reductions in direct and indirect costs were found in the AMU hospitalist group compared to the non-hospitalist group (28.6% reduction, 95% CI: 26.6-30.5%, P =0.000; 23.3% reduction, 95% CI: 20.9-25.5%, P =0.000; respectively). The net-benefit and benefit-cost ratio (BCR) of the AMU hospitalist care group were US $6846 and 1.33 per patient admission, respectively., Conclusions: The AMU hospitalist care model was associated with remarkable reductions in multiple costs. The results of the sensitivity analysis indicated that the net-benefit estimates of AMU hospitalist care were similar to the baseline estimates. Thus, the overall net-benefit of AMU hospitalist care was found to be largely positive., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF