Search

OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of positron emission tomography (PET) in diagnosing occult malignancies in patients with paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNSs) at Mayo Clinic's site in Rochester, MN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectivety reviewed the medical charts of all 107 patients who underwent PET from January 1, 2000, to July 31, 2006, for the indication of suspected PNS. Three patients did not meet inclusion criteria. PET results were considered positive if increased fiudeoxygiucose F 18 uptake indicated malignancy (24 patients). Resuits from computed tomography were interpreted as positive if any suspect lesion was consistent with malignancy (26 patients). RESULTS: One hundred four patients with PNS were identified from the PET centrai database; 73 patients had at ieast 1 positive resuit for paraneopiastic antibody, and 31 had antibody-negative PNS. Malignancy was confirmed páthologically in 10 patients, of whom 8 had positive PET results. There were 2 cases of confirmed malignancy (faliopian tube adenocarcinoma and spindie cell uterine carcinoma) for which PET resuits were negative. Two patients with positive PET results declined biopsy. Computed tomography was able to identify 3 of the 10 malignancies detected. Five cases of malignancy were detected only by PET. All patients with confirmed malignancy had positive results for at least 1 paraneoplastic antibody. One patient with positive resuits for PNS antibody and negative PET results was diagnosed as having small cell carcinoma on a follow-up PET scan after 27 months. PET had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 80%, 67%, 53%, and 88%, respectively. CONCLUSION: PET scan was shown to be more sensitive than computed tomography for detecting occult malignancy (confirmed by positive test results for autoantibody) among patients with suspected PNS. The greatest clinical utility of PET could be in its high negative predictive value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Objective: To analyze clinical presentation of and paraclinical test abnormalities in patients with paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis (PLE). • Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 24 patients seen at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn, between 1985 and 2002 in whom PLE was suspected. Patients were identified on the basis of clinical history and presence of cancer. Data were reviewed from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, electroencephalography (EEG), and paraneoplastic serologic studies. • Results: Common manifestations were cognitive dysfunction (92%), seizures (58%), and psychiatric symptoms (50%); 13 patients had small cell lung carcinoma; 11 had other malignancies. Paraneoplastic neuronal autoantibodies were found in 14 (64%) of 22 patients tested. Electroencephalography showed focal or generalized slowing and/ or epileptiform activity, maximal in the temporal regions, in all 22 patients tested. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed increased T2 signal involving one or both temporal lobes in 15 (83%) of 18 patients. Cerebrospinal fluid test results were abnormal in 18 (78%) of 23 patients tested. Clinical or radiographic evidence of extralimbic involvement was documented in 12 (55%) of 22 patients. No abnormality on EEG, MRI, or CSF analysis correlated with a specific cancer type or with a specific paraneoplastic autoantibody. • Conclusions: In patients with suspected PLE, EEG is invaluable for confirming cerebral dysfunction. Magnetic resonance imaging can show unequivocal involvement of temporolimbic structures and helps exclude other diagnoses. When EEG and cranial MRI are both normal, PLE is unlikely. Comprehensive testing for paraneoplastic neuronal nuclear, cytoplasmic, and ion channel autoantibodies is an important part of the evaluation, but negative results do not rule out PLE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]