1. Particulate Emissions Calculations from Fall Tillage Operations Using Point and Remote Sensors.
- Author
-
Moore, Kori D., Wojcik, Michael D., Martin, Randal S., Marchant, Christian C., Bingham, Gail E., Pfeifer, Richard L., Prueger, John H., and Hatield, Jerry L.
- Subjects
PARTICULATE matter & the environment ,TILLAGE ,REMOTE sensing ,TOTAL suspended solids ,AGRICULTURE & the environment - Abstract
Soil preparation for agricultural crops produces aerosols that may significantly contribute to seasonal atmospheric particulate matter (PM). Efforts to reduce PM emissions from tillage through a variety of conservation management practices (CMPs) have been made, but the reductions from many of these practices have not been measured in the field. A study was conducted in California's San Joaquin Valley to quantify emissions reductions from fall tillage CMP. Emissions were measured from conventional tillage methods and from a "combined operations" CMP, which combines several implements to reduce tractor passes. Measurements were made of soil moisture, bulk density, meteorological profiles, filter-based total suspended PM (TSP), concentrations of PM with an equivalent aerodynamic diameter ≤10 μm (PM
10 ) and PM with an equivalent aerodynamic diameter ≤2.5 μm (PM2.5 ), and aerosol size distribution. A mass-calibrated, scanning, three-wavelength light detection and ranging (LIDAR) procedure estimated PM through a series of algorithms. Emissions were calculated via inverse modeling with mass concentration measurements and applying a mass balance to LIDAR data. Inverse modeling emission estimates were higher, often with statistically significant differences. Derived PM10 emissions for conventional operations generally agree with literature values. Sampling irregularities with a few filter-based samples prevented calculation of a complete set of emissions through inverse modeling; however, the LIDAR-based emissions dataset was complete. The CMP control effectiveness was calculated based on LIDAR-derived emissions to be 29 ± 2%, 60 ± 1%, and 25 ± 1% for PM2.5 , PM10 , and TSP size fractions, respectively. Implementation of this CMP provides an effective method for the reduction of PM emissions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF