Search

The discontinuity of care and actions in the territory in primary health care during pandemic periods can escalate acute and chronic complications and mortality. In this sense, this article aims to present the barriers and facilitators for care continuity and actions in the territory during the COVID-19 pandemic in São Paulo municipalities. This qualitative analysis was conducted through 37 interviews with health managers and professionals from six municipalities. Two facilitators were identified: the availability of a specific service for attending COVID-19-related respiratory demands and the integration of the health team professionals before the pandemic. Two barriers were identified: a fragile primary healthcare structure before the pandemic and the lack of alignment of health professionals’ actions with the community and territorial care model. We concluded that municipalities with a structured PHC system before the pandemic faced fewer hardships in preserving care continuity and actions in the territory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article aims to understand how the cities of São Paulo state organized the coping with the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting the role of Primary Health Care (PHC) as an analyzing element of the healthcare model. This descriptive quantitative study was grounded on a survey with a probabilistic sample of 253 municipalities in the state of São Paulo in which municipal managers were interviewed through a questionnaire. Absolute (n) and relative (%) frequencies were described after weighting according to the three population strata. The results indicate that the population size is an essential analytical component. During the pandemic, the organization prioritized flow readjustment and clinical care in most municipalities. Prenatal care and childcare continuing actions consisted of biomedical actions with appointments. Regarding the promotion of expanded healthcare responses, the smaller municipalities, which are structured based on the PHC, performed better. On the other hand, large cities fragmented healthcare and vaccination. The intersectoral actions of community care and from a territorial perspective were still retracted, and PHC still struggles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The study examined municipal managers’ perceptions of extraordinary funding and its use to address COVID-19. In this multiple-case, quantitative and qualitative study, using embedded mixed methods, semi-structured interviews were conducted in six case-municipalities in São Paulo state. Secondary data for 2020 to 2022, drawn from information systems, were analysed. The municipalities differed by population, health expenditures and access to federal funding, making it possible to observe different financial management strategies and resource allocation. In addition to the extraordinary funding, considerable budget transfers were found to have been made by Parliamentary Amendments during the study period. In a context where the national Unified Health System is underfunded, extraordinary funding and budget transfers by Parliamentary Amendments often enabled managers to organise municipal health systems to meet their understanding of health needs and possible responses to those needs. Funding to address COVID-19 was allocated mainly to medium- and high-complexity services and to engaging private companies [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]