Search

Size-specific dose estimate (SSDE), which can be calculated by measuring the effective diameter (D e) or water equivalent diameter (D w) of the patient, is one of the recent approaches for verifying the individual doses during computer tomography (CT) examinations. This work aimed to compare the D w estimated by the AutoWED tool and IndoseCT software and to investigate CT axial (ARH) and paediatric head (PH) protocols used in southern Saudi Arabia to calculate the dose received by paediatric patients using metrics of volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and SSDE. The distribution between the ARH and PH protocols was 57.8 and 42.2%, respectively. There was no significant difference in D w values between the AutoWED tool and the IndoseCT program (0.13%). Including CT table or other objects during estimation of D w can lead to variation up to 11.4%. The impact of selecting IndoseCT options to identify the border of the patient may be part of the explanation for these variations. A strong linear relationship was obtained between D e and D w in paediatric head size (R 2 = 0.96). Using IndoseCT, for 0–1.5, 1.5–5 and 5.0–18 age groups (years), the D w was found to be 13.2, 15.3 and 16.8 cm, respectively. The SSDE for the PH protocol was substantially lower than that of the ARH protocol. As a result, education of the individuals engaging in paediatric CT examinations is necessary for dose optimization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mammary glands or breasts are radiosensitive organs that makeup 12% of the body's overall radiation sensitivity. According to estimates, Saudi Arabia has a 27.3% overall cancer incidence rate for breast cancer. Recent studies reported that breasts get significant organ equivalent doses during diagnostic procedures with ionizing radiation, even though the breast is not the target organ. The objective of this work is to assess the effective and breast equivalent doses during positron emission tomography (PET)/Computed tomography (CT) imaging examinations. The effective and breast equivalent doses per PET/CT (GE PET/CT 710) examination were quantified using the amount of the injected radiopharmaceutical (MBq) (18F- fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)), and external doses from CT examinations. The average, standard deviation (SD) and range of examined patients' age (years) and body mass index ((BMI), kg/m2) were 58 ± 11 (39–76) and 30 ± 5 (20.7–43.1), respectively. Constant administered activity (AA, 185 MBq) and tube potential (120 kVp) were used for all patients. The average, SD, and range of the patients effective dose (mSv) from PET/CT (18F- FDG) examination was 8.0 ± 0.93 (7.0–10.0) and 2.075 ± 0.11 (1.91–2.29) in that order. Breast doses are comparable with previous studies during the PET/CT and mammographic examination. Proper justification criteria and dose optimization are essential to lowering excessive exposure while preserving image quality, especially for young females because they have a higher risk of radiation-induced cancer. • Breast doses during PET/CT imaging procedures were evaluated. • Breast absorbed dose depends on CT protocol and administered activity. • The organ equivalent dose ranged from 1.91 to 2.29 mGy per procedure. • Breast doses are comparable with previous studies PET/CT procedures. • Young females have a higher risk of breast cancer due to PET/CT procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Occupational radiation exposure can occur due to various human activities, including the use of radiation in medicine. Occupationally exposed personnel surpassing 7.4 millions, and respresent the biggest single group of employees who are exposed to artificial radiation sources at work. This study compares the occupational radiation dose levels for 145 workers in four different hospitals located in the Aseer region in Saudi Arabia. The occupational exposure was quantified using thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLD-100). The levels of annual occupational exposures in targeted hospitals were calculated and compared with the levels of the international atomic energy agency (IAEA) Safety Standards. An average yearly cumulative dose for the two consecutive years. The average, highest and lowest resulted occupational doses under examination in this work is 1.42, 3.9 mSv and 0.72 for workers in various diagnostic radiology procedures. The resulted annual effective dose were within the IAEA approved yearly dose limit for occupational exposure of workers over 18, which is 20 mSv. Staff should be monitored on a regular basis, according to current practice, because their annual exposure may surpass 15% of the annual effective doses. • Annual occupational dose (Hp(10) were evaluated at four diagnostic radiology department. • Staff doses represent approximately 15% of the annual effective dose. • Students and trainees should be monitored on a regular basis, according to current practice. • Occupational exposure is comparable with the most previously published studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Occupational exposure to ionizing radiation of medical personnel is very common at radiology and nuclear medicine departments. Strict regulations and guidelines for the exposure of staff working in such departments were regulated by international authorities such as the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) as well as national protocols. In order to reduce stochastic effects, for example, radiation induced carcinogenesis, the exposure of staff working at nuclear medicine department should be maintained at levels lower than 20 mSv per year or 100 mSv in five years. The objective of this study is to measure staff radiation dose at four radiology departments in the south region of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Exposures received by a total of 106 staff working at the radiology department were monitored for two consecutive years using calibrated Thermoluminecnt dosimeters (LiF:Mg:Ti (TLD-100). Exposure was then quantified in terms of deep dose: Hp (10). The TLD signal was obtained using an automatic TLD reader (Harshaw 6600). The overall annual dose for staff was 1.4 ± 0.37 (0.67–8.74). The study revealed that the annual radiation exposure in the four-radiology department is below the annual dose limits. However, staff doses could be reduced if proper radiation protection are followed. • Staff annual radiation dose were assessed for radiology technologists for two consecutive years. • Occupational doses were quantified with LiF: Mg, Ti (TLD-100). • 90% of monitored staff received an annual occupational dose below 2.0 mSv. • Radiology technologists are well protected against occupational exposure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The main objective of this study is to identify the atmospheric 7Be concentrations in 130 surface air samples collected from three stations located in Riyadh, Haql and Khafji cities in Saudi Arabia between November 2012 and April 2014. Monthly variations as well as seasonal patterns of 7Be were studied using a medium-volume air sampler and a gamma spectroscopy system equipped with a high-purity germanium (HPGe) detector. 7Be exhibited one maximum specific activity in summer and one minimum in winter with average monthly concentrations of 12.4 ± 0.9, 15.4 ± 1.2, and 18.0 ± 1.3 mBq m−3 in Riyadh, Haql and Khafji, respectively. Overall, the average 7Be concentration in the three stations was 12.9 ± 1.0 mBq m−3, whereas the maximum value of 29.5 mBq m−3 was registered in Khafji city in August 2013. Besides 7Be, measurements indicate observations of 40 K, 137Cs, 226Ra radionuclides in surface air samples collected from the three stations. 40 K showed measurable concentrations, whereas the concentrations of 137Cs and 226Ra were only detected in a limited number of samples. • 7Be were studied using a medium-volume air sampler and a gamma spectroscopy system. • The measurements were performed in three locations in Saudi Arabia. • 4 K showed measurable concentrations, whereas the concentrations of 137Cs and 226Ra were below the detection limit. • 7Be and 4 K radionuclides were affected by local atmospheric conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aims to introduce national diagnostic reference levels (NDRLs) for adult hybrid single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT-CT) in nuclear medicine (NM) departments in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The administered activity (AA) of radiopharmaceuticals, volume-weighted computed tomography dose index (CTDI vol ) and dose length product (DLP) for ten hybrid SPECT/CT examinations were collected and analysed for one year. The median of AA, CTDI vol and DLP for each dose quantity was derived and the suggested national DRLs were determined based on the 75 th percentile for all identified SPECT-CT examinations. A comparison of the defined adult NDRLs in Saudi Arabia with the published data of other countries was performed. Although there are no significant variations of the proposed NDRL of AA between countries, the proposed NDRLs of the integrated CT metrics exceed the published data in most procedures. NM departments are urged to consider optimisation for both image quality and radiation protection., (© 2023 Society for Radiological Protection. Published on behalf of SRP by IOP Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.)

Staff occupational radiation exposure is limited to 20 mSv annually to preclude tissue reaction and lower risk of cancer effect. Staff occupational exposure arises during the preparation, injection, and scanning of the patients. Recent studies reported that nuclear medicine personnel might exceed the annual dose limit in high workload and poor radiation protection circumstances. Therefore, an accurate estimation of the annual dose limit is recommended. The goal of this research is to calculate the cumulative external effective dose (mSv) per year for nuclear medicine physicians, technologists, and nurses at SPECT/CT department. A total of 15 staff worked in the nuclear medicine department at King Saud Medical City (KSMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia were evaluated for the last six years. 99m Tc is used more frequently for most of the patients. The procedures include renal, cardiac scintigraphy procedures. Staff dose was quantified using calibrated thermoluminecnt dosimeters (TLD-100) with an automatic TLD reader (Harshaw 6600). Exposure to ionizing radiation was evaluated in terms of deep doses (Hp(10) were evaluated. The overall average and standard deviation of the external doses for nuclear medicine physicians, technologists' and nurses were 1.8 ± 0.7, 1.9 ± 0.6, 2.0 ± 0.9, 2.2 ± 0.8, 6.0 ± 2.8, and 3.6 ± 1.3 for the years 2015,2016,2017,2018,2019, and 2020, respectively. Technologists and nurses received higher doses of compared to the nuclear medicine physicians. Technologists and nurses involved in radionuclide preparation, patients' injection, and image acquisition. Staff annual exposure is below the annual dose limits; however, this external dose is considered high compared to the current workload., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Among the different cancers found in women, breast cancer is the most common. Breast cancer-related lymphedema is a serious health complication affecting the quality of life and sleep quality. This study evaluates the quality of life and sleep quality among Saudi women with different stages of lymphedema following the treatment of breast cancer., Methods: This cross-sectional correlational study included 163 Saudi women with breast cancer-related lymphedema (Stages I-III), aged 28 to 56 years. From the patients identified for this study, women who suffered from mental and psychological dysfunctions or other malignant disorders were excluded. Copies of structured questionnaires were given to each participant during their visits to outpatient physiotherapy clinics. Quality of life was assessed using a valid questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), while sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The differences between the different lymphedema stages have been assessed., Results: Of the total number of participants 27 women had been diagnosed with stage I lymphedema, 84 women had been diagnosed with stage II lymphedema, and 52 women had been diagnosed with stage III lymphedema. All participants have shown low scores on both EORTC QLQ-C30 and PSQI. While analyzing the differences between the 3 stages of lymphedema with the Kruskal-Wallis test, noteworthy statistical differences between the 3 stages of lymphedema ( P  < .05) have been found. The Stage III lymphedema patients have been shown the lowest quality of life values in all scales when compared with the stage I and stage II lymphedema patients. For PSQI scores, the stage III lymphedema patients worse values than the stage I and stage II lymphedema patients ( P  < .05)., Conclusion and Recommendations: Both quality of life and quality of sleep have significantly decreased in Saudi women with different stages of breast cancer-related lymphedema. Quality of life and quality of sleep are the worst in stage III lymphedema patients. Future research should consider repeat and enlarge these results as well as assess the risk factors that affect the quality of life and quality of sleep among Saudi women suffering from breast cancer-related lymphedema.