Search

A pilot study of tele-oncology linking a cancer centre with a rural district general hospital was carried out; it involved patients, physicians, surgeons, radiologists and nursing staff. Its purpose was to complement the existing on-site outpatient services, providing oncological advice on non-clinic days. During the six months of the trial, 18 videoconferences were conducted. Their median duration was 17 min (range 7-40). Eight videoconferences involved patients directly. Acceptability of videoconferencing to doctors, nurses and patients was assessed by a questionnaire. Patients and staff found the technique acceptable and were satisfied with the results. The addition of a teleradiology system to teleconsultations was found to be important when decisions on patient management were taken. Following the success of this pilot trial, large studies of tele-oncology in the UK with measures of cost-effectiveness are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Breast-conserving surgery, adjuvant systemic therapy, and radiotherapy are the standard of care for most women with early breast cancer. There are few reports of clinical outcomes beyond the first decade of follow-up of randomised trials comparing breast-conserving surgery with or without radiotherapy. We present a 30-year update of the Scottish Breast Conservation Trial., Methods: In this randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial across 14 hospitals in Scotland, women aged younger than 70 years with early breast cancer (tumours ≤4 cm [T1 or T2 and N0 or N1]) were included. They underwent breast-conserving surgery (1 cm margin) with axillary node sampling or clearance. Oestrogen receptor (ER)-rich patients (≥20 fmol/mg protein) received 20 mg oral tamoxifen daily for 5 years. ER-poor patients (<20 fmol/mg protein) received chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m 2 , methotrexate 50 mg/m 2 , and fluorouracil 600 mg/m 2 every 21 days intravenously in eight courses). Stratification was by menstrual status (within or more than 12 months from last menstrual period) and ER status (oestrogen concentration ≥20 fmol/mg protein, <20 fmol/mg protein, or unknown) and patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to high-dose (50 Gy in 20-25 fractions) local or locoregional radiotherapy versus no radiotherapy. No blinding was possible due to the nature of the treatment. We report the primary endpoint of the original trial, ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence, and the co-primary endpoint, overall survival. Clinical outcomes were compared by the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) are reported, with no radiotherapy as the reference group. Failures of the proportional hazards assumption are reported if significant. All analyses are by intention to treat., Findings: Between April 1, 1985, and Oct 2, 1991, 589 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the two treatment groups (293 to radiotherapy and 296 to no radiotherapy). After exclusion of four ineligible patients (two in each group), there were 291 patients in the radiotherapy group and 294 patients in the no radiotherapy group. Median follow-up was 17·5 years (IQR 8·4-27·9). Ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence was significantly lower in the radiotherapy group than in the no radiotherapy group (46 [16%] of 291 vs 107 [36%] of 294; HR 0·39 [95% CI 0·28-0·55], p<0·0001). Although there were differences in the hazard rate for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence in the first decade after treatment (HR 0·24 [95% CI 0·15-0·38], p<0·0001), subsequent risks of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence were similar in both groups (0·98 [0·54-1·79], p=0·95). There was no difference in overall survival between the two groups (median 18·7 years [95% CI 16·5-21·5] in the no radiotherapy group vs 19·2 years [16·9-21·3] in the radiotherapy group; HR 1·08 [95% CI 0·89-1 ·30], log-rank p=0·43)., Interpretation: Our findings suggest that patients whose biology predicts a late relapse a decade or more after breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer might gain little from adjuvant radiotherapy., Funding: Breast Cancer Institute (part of Edinburgh and Lothian Health Foundation) and PFS Genomics (now part of Exact Sciences)., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)