Search

aims to quantify patients' risk-benefit preferences for chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to elicit their willingness to pay (WTP) for treatment outcomes. Methods: A face-to-face discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted on NSCLC patients in four tertiary hospitals each from Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Chengdu in China. Patients were invited to complete choice questions that constructed by seven attributes: progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), rash, nausea and vomiting, tiredness, mode of administration and out-of-pocket costs. A mixed logit model was used to evaluate the choice model. Estimates of relative preferences and marginal willingness to pay for each attribute were then explored. Results: A total of 361 patients completed the survey. Improvements in PFS (10, 95% CI: 8.4–11.6) were the most important attribute for patients, followed by increase in DCR (4.6, 95% CI: 3.4–5.8). Tiredness (3.9, 95% CI: 2.9–5.1) was judged to be the most important risk. While remaining attributes were ranked in decreasing order of importance: nausea and vomiting (1.9, 95% CI: 0.9–3.0), mode of administration (0.8, 95% CI: 0.2–1.4) and rash (0.5, 95% CI: −0.6–1.5). There was little variation in preferences among patients with different sociodemographic characteristics. Patients were monthly willing to pay $2304 (95% CI, $1916–$2754) that guaranteed 11 months of PFS, followed by $1465 (95% CI, $1163-$1767) per month to improve their disease control rate by 90%. Conclusion: The results suggested that efficacy was the most important attribute for patients. Side effects, mode of administration and treatment cost significantly influenced patient preferences. Patient engagement in prioritizing their treatment preferences should be emphasized during the clinical decision-making process and regimen implementation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • The COVID-19 pandemic of Shanghai 2022 has led many young adults to stay indoors. • It's the first fNIRS study on long-term effects of confinement and music stimulation. • The negative emotions increased significantly with the length of confinement. • Negative emotions may inhibit prefrontal function in young people. • Music stimulation improve efficiency by altering the pattern of connections in frontal lobe. The Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic may have had a negative emotional impact on individuals. This study investigated the effect of long-term lockdown and music on young people's mood and neurophysiological responses in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Fifteen healthy young adults were recruited and PFC activation was acquired using functional near-infrared spectroscopy during the conditions of resting, Stroop and music stimulation. The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales mental scale scores were simultaneously recorded. Mixed effect models, paired t-tests, one-way ANOVAs and Spearman analyses were adopted to analyse the experimental parameters. Stress, anxiety and depression levels increased significantly from Day 30 to Day 40. In terms of reaction time, both Stroop1 and Stroop2 were faster on Day 40 than on Day 30 (P = 0.01, P = 0.003). The relative concentration changes of oxyhemoglobin were significantly higher during premusic conditions than music stimulation and postmusic Stroop. The intensity of functional connectivity shifted from inter- to intracerebral over time. In conclusion, the reduced hemodynamic response of the PFC in healthy young adults is associated with negative emotions, especially anxiety, during lockdown. Immediate music stimulation appears to improve efficiency by altering the pattern of connections in PFC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]