Search

Arctic tundra is facing unprecedented warming, resulting in shifts in the vegetation, thaw regimes, and potentially in the ecosystem–atmosphere exchange of carbon (C). However, the estimates of regional carbon dioxide (CO 2) and methane (CH 4) budgets are highly uncertain. We measured CO 2 and CH 4 fluxes, vegetation composition and leaf area index (LAI), thaw depth, and soil wetness in Tiksi (71 ∘ N, 128 ∘ E), a heterogeneous site located within the prostrate dwarf-shrub tundra zone in northeastern Siberia. Using the closed chamber method, we determined the net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of CO 2 , ecosystem respiration in the dark (ER), ecosystem gross photosynthesis (Pg), and CH 4 flux during the growing season. We applied a previously developed high-spatial-resolution land cover map over an area of 35.8 km 2 for spatial extrapolation. Among the land cover types varying from barren to dwarf-shrub tundra and tundra wetlands, the NEE and Pg at the photosynthetically active photon flux density of 800 µ mol m -2 h -1 (NEE 800 and Pg 800) were greatest in the graminoid-dominated habitats, i.e., streamside meadow and fens, with NEE 800 and Pg 800 of up to - 21 (uptake) and 28 mmol m -2 h -1 , respectively. Vascular LAI was a robust predictor of both NEE 800 and Pg 800 and, on a landscape scale, the fens were disproportionately important for the summertime CO 2 sequestration. Dry tundra, including the dwarf-shrub and lichen tundra, had smaller CO 2 exchange rates. The fens were the largest source of CH 4 , while the dry mineral soil tundra consumed atmospheric CH 4 , which on a landscape scale amounted to - 9 % of the total CH 4 balance during the growing season. The largest seasonal mean CH 4 consumption rate of 0.02 mmol m -2 h -1 occurred in sand- and stone-covered barren areas. The high consumption rate agrees with the estimate based on the eddy covariance measurements at the same site. We acknowledge the uncertainty involved in spatial extrapolations due to a small number of replicates per land cover type. This study highlights the need to distinguish different land cover types including the dry tundra habitats to account for their different CO 2 and CH 4 flux patterns, especially the consumption of atmospheric CH 4 , when estimating tundra C exchange on a larger spatial scale. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Arctic tundra is facing unprecedented warming, resulting in shifts in the vegetation, thaw regimes, and potentially in the ecosystem-atmosphere exchange of carbon (C). The estimates of regional carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) budgets, however, are highly uncertain. We measured CO2 and CH4 fluxes, vegetation composition and leaf area index (LAI), thaw depth, and soil wetness in Tiksi (71° N, 128° E), a heterogeneous site located within the prostrate dwarf-shrub tundra zone in northeastern Siberia. Using the closed chamber method, we determined net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of CO2, dark ecosystem respiration (ER), ecosystem gross photosynthesis (Pg), and CH4 fluxes during the growing season. We applied a previously developed high-spatial-resolution land-cover map over an m area of 35.8 km². Among the land-cover types varying from barrens to dwarf-shrub tundra and tundra wetlands, the light-saturated NEE and Pg scaled with the LAI of vascular plants. Thus, the graminoid-dominated tundra wetlands, with high LAI and the deepest thaw depth, had the highest light-saturated NEE and Pg (up to -21 (uptake) and 28 mmol m-2 h-1, respectively) and were disproportionately important for the summertime CO2 sequestration on a landscape scale. Dry tundra, including the dwarf-shrub-dominated vegetation and only sparsely vegetated lichen tundra, had only small CO2 exchange rates. While tundra wetlands were sources of CH4, lichen tundra, including bare ground habitats, consumed atmospheric CH4 at a substantial rate. On a landscape scale, the consumption by lichen tundra and barrens could offset ca. 10% of the CH4 emissions. We acknowledge the uncertainty involved in spatial extrapolations due to a small number of replicates per land-cover type. This study, however, highlights the need for distinguishing different land-cover types including the dry tundra habitats to account for their consumption of the atmospheric CH4 when estimating tundra C-exchange on a larger spatial scale. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]