Search

Background: Antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) are well established in the public hospitals in Singapore, but they are not mandatory for transplant programs. Given the positive impact of ASPs in non‐organ transplant patients (improved use of broad‐spectrum antibiotics, reduced length of stay, and lower healthcare costs), stewardship principles are likely to benefit transplant recipients. Methods: We reviewed the progress made in ASPs in the Asia Pacific region as well as the progress of our ASP over the last decade since it was established. We also described how stewardship strategies have evolved for the purposes of our transplant program. Results: Currently, pressing stewardship issues for our transplant program include high antibiotic consumption, as well as the burden, morbidity, and mortality associated with drug‐resistant bacterial infections. Transplanting the model of stewardship onto a transplant program ignores the intricacies of transplant patients; the bespoke form of stewardship, "handshake stewardship", is more appropriate. Conclusion: To advance the cause of ASP in the transplant unit in Singapore, stakeholder buy‐in is key; empowering transplant physicians to be stewardship‐focused would be more sustainable in the long run. In addition, expanding our diagnostic armamentarium, optimizing existing therapeutics and multi‐disciplinary team involvement (including stakeholders from microbiology, and infection prevention teams) are vital. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Penicillin allergy is the most common drug allergy among hospitalized patients. Traditionally, aztreonam is recommended for patients labeled with penicillin allergy (PLWPA) in our institutional empirical antibiotic guidelines. Due to a global aztreonam shortage in December 2022, the antimicrobial stewardship unit recommended ceftazidime as a substitute. There is a paucity of real-world data on the safety profile of ceftazidime in PLWPA. Hence, we evaluated tolerability outcomes of ceftazidime use in PLWPA., Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared PLWPA in Singapore General Hospital who received aztreonam (October 2022-December 2022) or ceftazidime (December 2022-February 2023). Patients were stratified according to their risk of allergic reaction (AR) based on history of penicillin allergy. The severity of AR was based on the Delphi study grading system. The primary outcome was development of AR after initiation of aztreonam or ceftazidime. The secondary tolerability outcomes include hepatotoxicity and neurotoxicity., Findings: There were 168 patients in the study; 69 were men (41.1%) and the median age was 69 years (interquartile range: 59-76 years). Incidence of AR was statistically similar in both arms: 1 of 102 patients (0.98%) in the aztreonam arm vs 2 of 66 patients (3.03%) in the ceftazidime arm (P = 0.33). The patient in the aztreonam arm was deemed at medium risk of having an AR and developed localized rashes (grade 1). Both patients in the ceftazidime arm were deemed at high risk of AR and developed localized skin reaction (grade 1). Hepatotoxicity was observed in 1 patient prescribed aztreonam. No patients in the ceftazidime arm developed adverse events., Implications: Ceftazidime appears to be better tolerated and cheaper compared with aztreonam in PLWPA, and serves as an antimicrobial stewardship strategy to conserve broader-spectrum antibiotics use., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Voriconazole serum concentration, which is affected by several factors, is associated with treatment response and toxicity. There is paucity of data on voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) among Southeast Asians, who exhibit a higher prevalence of CYP2C19-poor metabolisers compared with Caucasians and East Asians. Hence, there are concerns for higher risk of voriconazole accumulation and toxicity. We aim to determine the utility of voriconazole TDM through establishing: (1) proportion of patients achieving therapeutic troughs without dose adjustments; (2) characterisation of patients with sub-therapeutic, therapeutic and supra-therapeutic levels; (3) appropriate dose titrations/dose required for therapeutic troughs; (4) correlation between troughs and adverse events, treatment response/fungal breakthrough., Patients and Methods: A single-centre retrospective analysis of data from adults (≥21 years old) with ≥1 voriconazole trough measured at Singapore General Hospital from 2015 to 2017 was performed., Results: Thirty-two patients (45.7%) among 70 patients achieved therapeutic troughs (defined as 2.0-5.5 mg/L) without dose adjustments. Eleven patients (15.7%) experienced hepatotoxicity (troughs 0.5 to >7.5 mg/L). Neurotoxicity occurred in three patients (4.3%) (troughs ≥6.7 mg/L) and all patients had symptom resolution upon dose reduction. Treatment failure of invasive fungal infection appeared less in patients with therapeutic troughs compared with sub-therapeutic troughs (11.4% vs. 14.2%). Two patients experienced treatment failure despite supra-therapeutic voriconazole troughs., Conclusions: TDM should be implemented due to significant unpredictability in dose exposure. TDM can reduce unnecessary switches to alternatives due to intolerability and rule in the possibility of resistant organisms in the event of treatment failure despite therapeutic troughs, alerting clinicians to switch to alternatives promptly., (Copyright © 2019 International Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)