Search

Aims: To verify the applicability, reproducibility and predictive value of a proposed unified classification (amended Ljubljana classification) for laryngeal squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs)., Methods and Results: Six internationally recognized experts and three pathologists from Ljubljana contributed to this study by evaluating a set of laryngeal SILs using the new system: low-grade SIL, high-grade SIL, and carcinoma in situ (CIS). The overall agreement among reviewers was good. Overall unweighted and weighted κ-values and 95% confidence intervals were 0.75 (0.65-0.84) and 0.80 (0.71-0.87), respectively. The results were stratified between the international reviewers and the Ljubljana pathologists. The former had good overall agreement, and the latter had very good agreement. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed a significant difference (P < 0.0001) between patients with low-grade and high-grade SILs; 19 of 1204 patients with low-grade SILs and 30 of 240 patients with high-grade SILs progressed to malignancy in 2-15 years and in 2-26 years, respectively., Conclusions: The proposed modification to the Ljubljana classification provides clear morphological criteria for defining the prognostic groups. The criteria facilitate better interobserver agreement than previous systems, and the retrospective follow-up study demonstrates a highly significant difference in the risk of malignant progression between low-grade and high-grade SILs., (© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The diagnosis, prognosis, and choice of treatment of various laryngeal lesions depends almost entirely on the interpretation of changes in the covering epithelium. These abnormalities, referred to as epithelial hyperplastic laryngeal lesions, have been graded according to the Ljubljana classification into simple, abnormal and atypical (risky epithelium) hyperplasia and carcinoma in situ. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical applicability and prognostic value of this classification and to determine the incidence of malignant transformation. A retrospective clinical-pathological analysis was performed in a series of 4167 patients with 4574 biopsies, treated from 1979 to 1994. Simple (benign prickle cell) hyperplasia was the predominant grade in nodules, polyps, Reinke's oedema, granulomas, and papillomas, accounting for 37.6-68.6% of cases. In chronic laryngitis, abnormal (benign basal cell) hyperplasia was predominant with 43.9% of cases. Atypical ('risky') hyperplasia was observed almost exclusively in patients with chronic laryngitis (16.1%) and papillomas (10.1%), and only exceptionally in patients with vocal cord nodules (0.9%) and Reinke's oedema (0.3%). The percentage of malignant transformation in atypical hyperplasia was 11.6% (13/112 patients in 2-12 years), while in simple and abnormal hyperplasia, it was 0.3% (8/2920 patients in 1.5-11 years). The data support the concept of the Ljubljana classification dividing epithelial hyperplastic laryngeal lesions into benign (simple and abnormal hyperplasia), potentially malignant (atypical hyperplasia) lesions and carcinoma in situ.

Aims: To validate histological criteria for the grading of epithelial hyperplastic laryngeal lesions (EHHL) (dysplastic laryngeal lesions), we used a system that had been devised and tested in Ljubljana, Slovenia over many years and was felt to be more appropriate to laryngeal pathology than is the commonly-used model of intraepithelial neoplasia in the cervix., Methods and Results: Vocal cord biopsies of 45 patients with a broad spectrum of EHLL were reviewed. Detailed histological criteria were formulated for each of the four grades of EHLL in the Ljubljana classification, comprising simple hyperplasia (benign spinous layer augmentation), abnormal hyperplasia (benign basal and parabasal layer augmentation), atypical hyperplasia (risky for malignancy) and carcinoma in situ (actually malignant, but without invasion)., Conclusions: Using these criteria a high degree of concordance of histological diagnoses of grading levels for the Ljubljana classification was achieved between the pathologists of the Working Group. The system was found to be more precise for routine diagnostic work than the others in vogue. The different grades of the Ljubljana classification correspond to significantly different levels yielded in each grade by the semiobjective methods of quantitative morphometry and immunohistochemistry.