Search

Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB), defined as resistance to at least isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF), a fluoroquinolone (FQ) and a second-line injectable drug (SLID), is difficult to treat and poses a major threat to TB control. The transmission dynamics and distribution of XDR Mycobacterium tuberculosis ( Mtb ) strains have not been thoroughly investigated. Using whole genome sequencing data on 461 XDR- Mtb strains, we aimed to investigate the geographical distribution of XDR- Mtb strains in the Western Cape Province of South Africa over a 10 year period (2006-2017) and assess the association between Mtb sub-lineage, age, gender, geographical patient location and membership or size of XDR-TB clusters. First, we identified transmission clusters by excluding drug resistance-conferring mutations and using the 5 SNP cutoff, followed by merging clusters based on their most recent common ancestor. We then consecutively included variants conferring resistance to INH, RIF, ethambutol (EMB), pyrazinamide (PZA), SLIDs and FQs in the cluster definition. Cluster sizes were classified as small (2-4 isolates), medium (5-20 isolates), large (21-100 isolates) or very large (>100 isolates) to reflect the success of individual strains. We found that most XDR-TB strains were clustered and that including variants conferring resistance to INH, RIF, EMB, PZA and SLIDs in the cluster definition did not significantly reduce the proportion of clustered isolates (85.5-82.2 %) but increased the number of patients belonging to small clusters (4.3-12.4 %, P =0.56). Inclusion of FQ resistance-conferring variants had the greatest effect, with 11 clustered isolates reclassified as unique while the number of clusters increased from 17 to 37. Lineage 2 strains (lineage 2.2.1 typical Beijing or lineage 2.2.2 atypical Beijing) showed the large clusters which were spread across all health districts of the Western Cape Province. We identified a significant association between residence in the Cape Town metropole and cluster membership ( P =0.016) but no association between gender, age and cluster membership or cluster size ( P =0.39). Our data suggest that the XDR-TB epidemic in South Africa probably has its origin in the endemic spread of MDR Mtb and pre-XDR Mtb strains followed by acquisition of FQ resistance, with more limited transmission of XDR Mtb strains. This only became apparent with the inclusion of drug resistance-conferring variants in the definition of a cluster. In addition to the prevention of amplification of resistance, rapid diagnosis of MDR, pre-XDR and XDR-TB and timely initiation of appropriate treatment is needed to reduce transmission of difficult-to-treat TB.

BACKGROUND: Xpert ® MTB/RIF was expected to revolutionise the management of rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB) by enabling rapid and decentralised diagnosis of rifampicin (RIF) resistance. METHODS: We performed a care cascade analysis for a cohort of RR-TB patients managed under programmatic conditions. Cumulative incidences of time to completion of the RR-TB care cascade steps were estimated, reasons for delay or attrition from the cascade investigated and WHO programme indicators for monitoring of RR-TB programmes calculated. RESULTS: Of 502 patients diagnosed with RR-TB using Xpert, 64% initiated multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) treatment immediately, 20% after some first-line treatment, 16% never initiated MDR-TB treatment, mainly because of death (44%) or loss to follow-up (26%) soon after diagnosis. A supplementary sputum sample was collected within 14 days of treatment in 58.8% of cases. Only 63% of RR-TB cases were assessed for isoniazid resistance, and only 65% of MDR-TB cases were evaluated for pre-XDR-TB (extensively drug-resistant TB). Treatment was individualised in 57% of pre-XDR and 68% of XDR-TB patients. Only 8% completed the entire RR-TB care cascade as intended. CONCLUSION: Fidelity to the RR-TB algorithm was poor, with substantial losses at each step of the cascade, highlighting the fact that implementation of novel technologies needs to be accompanied by health system strengthening to maximise impact.

Background: Use of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay has increased the number of people diagnosed with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB), especially in South Africa where Xpert is now the initial diagnostic for individuals with TB symptoms. We hypothesized that a proportion of RR-TB patients determined by Xpert can be treated with a rifabutin-containing regimen., Methods: Rifabutin susceptibility by rpoB mutation was assessed in 349 individuals from South Africa and 172 from Belgium. rpoB polymorphisms were identified by Sanger sequencing. Rifampicin and rifabutin susceptibility was assessed phenotypically. A systematic review was performed to comprehensively collate information on rifabutin susceptibility by rpoB polymorphism. Rifabutin susceptibility was assigned to rpoB polymorphisms based on their positive likelihood ratios and ORs., Results: One hundred and twelve rpoB polymorphisms (67.9% from literature) were identified from all 2045 RR-TB patients, of which 17 polymorphisms could be classified as susceptible/resistant to rifabutin. Eleven polymorphisms were associated with rifabutin susceptibility. The 516GTC mutation was the most common, representing 70% (South Africa) and 76% (Belgium) of all rifabutin-susceptible isolates. At a population level, the 11 polymorphisms associated with rifabutin susceptibility occurred in 33.2% and 16.6% of all South African and Belgian patients diagnosed with RR-TB, respectively., Conclusions: Identification of the exact rpoB polymorphism leading to the diagnosis of RR-TB has the potential to allow inclusion of rifabutin in the treatment regimen of a substantial proportion of RR-TB patients. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of a rifabutin-containing TB treatment regimen in these selected patients is needed to provide the evidence required for a change in policy.