1. Primary prevention of acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease with penicillin in South African children with pharyngitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
- Author
-
Irlam J, Mayosi BM, Engel M, and Gaziano TA
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Anti-Bacterial Agents adverse effects, Child, Child, Preschool, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Delivery of Health Care economics, Humans, Markov Chains, Models, Economic, Penicillins adverse effects, Pharyngitis diagnosis, Pharyngitis epidemiology, Pharyngitis microbiology, Prevalence, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Rheumatic Fever diagnosis, Rheumatic Fever epidemiology, Rheumatic Fever microbiology, Rheumatic Heart Disease diagnosis, Rheumatic Heart Disease epidemiology, Rheumatic Heart Disease microbiology, South Africa epidemiology, Treatment Outcome, Urban Health Services economics, Anti-Bacterial Agents economics, Anti-Bacterial Agents therapeutic use, Developing Countries economics, Drug Costs, Penicillins economics, Penicillins therapeutic use, Pharyngitis drug therapy, Pharyngitis economics, Primary Prevention economics, Rheumatic Fever economics, Rheumatic Fever prevention & control, Rheumatic Heart Disease economics, Rheumatic Heart Disease prevention & control
- Abstract
Background: Acute rheumatic fever and subsequent rheumatic heart disease remain significant in developing countries. We describe a cost-effective analysis of 7 strategies for the primary prevention of acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in children presenting with pharyngitis in urban primary care clinics in South Africa., Methods and Results: We used a Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of treatment with intramuscular penicillin using each of the following strategies: (1) empirical (treat all); (2) positive throat culture (culture all); (3) clinical decision rule (CDR) score ≥2 (CDR 2+); (4) CDR score ≥3 (CDR 3+); (5) treating those with a CDR score ≥2 plus those with CDR score <2 and positive cultures (CDR 2+, culture CDR negatives); (6) treating those with a CDR score ≥3 plus those with CDR score <3 and positive cultures (CDR 3+, culture CDR negatives); and (7) treat none. The strategies ranked in order from lowest cost were treat all ($11.19 per child), CDR 2+ ($11.20); the CDR 3+ ($13.00); CDR 2+, culture CDR negatives ($16.42); CDR 3+, culture CDR negatives ($23.89); and culture all ($27.21). The CDR 2+ is the preferred strategy at less than $150/quality-adjusted life year compared with the treat all strategy. A strategy of culturing all children compared with the CDR 2+ strategy costs more than $125 000/quality-adjusted life year gained., Conclusions: Treating all children presenting with pharyngitis in urban primary care clinics in South Africa with intramuscular penicillin is the least costly. A strategy of using a clinical decision rule without culturing is overall the preferred strategy. A strategy of culturing all children may be prohibitively expensive.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF