Search

Background: The term posterior horn lateral meniscal oblique radial tear (LMORT) has emerged to characterize the tear patterns of the lateral meniscus in many patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. There is a lack of data regarding the exact incidence according to the types of LMORT and clinical outcomes. Purposes: (1) To investigate the incidence of LMORT according to type in patients with acute ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and (2) to identify healing status after repair of LMORT via second-look arthroscopy and clinical outcomes. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence: 4. Methods: Patients who underwent primary ACLR within 6 months of injury were retrospectively reviewed. The LMORT was classified into 4 types based on the severity and distance from the root: type 1 (partial tear <10 mm from the root), type 2 (complete tear <10 mm from the root), type 3 (partial tear >10 mm from the root), type 4a (complete tear >10 mm from the root), and type 4b (type 4a with longitudinal tear at the meniscocapsular junction). Only patients with LMORT were isolated, and the clinical outcomes were compared according to the healing status of LMORT in second-look arthroscopy. Results: Of 635 patients with ACLR, LMORT was identified in 97 patients (15.3%), and type 4 LMORT accounted for the largest proportion (n = 62; 32.6%) of 190 lateral meniscal tears. In 79 patients with LMORT who satisfied the 2-year follow-up period, all patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including the Lysholm (preoperative, 64.1; postoperative, 88.2) and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective (preoperative, 50.5; postoperative, 82.9) scores, were significantly improved (P <.001) 31.8 months postoperatively. Of the 61 patients who underwent second-look arthroscopy, 49 (80.3%) were classified into the complete healing group. There was no significant difference in postoperative PROs between the complete and partial healing groups. Conclusion: The incidence of LMORT was 15.3% in patients with acute ACL injury, and type 4 LMORT was the most common type. Complete healing of LMORT was achieved in 80.3% of patients who underwent second-look arthroscopy, and the PROs were significantly improved postoperatively. Good clinical results can be achieved if the LMORT is repaired as much as possible during ACLR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Few studies have compared clinical and radiological outcomes after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with fixed-loop and adjustable-loop cortical suspension devices. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare clinical outcomes and tunnel widening after hamstring ACL reconstructions with fixed- and adjustable-loop cortical suspension devices. The hypothesis was that compared with femoral graft fixation with the fixed-loop device, fixation with the adjustable-loop device would show similar clinical outcomes and would result in less tunnel widening after hamstring ACL reconstruction. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 117 consecutive patients underwent hamstring ACL reconstruction at a single institution. The fixed-loop cortical suspension device was used in 67 patients, and the adjustable-loop cortical suspension device was used in 50 patients. All patients were observed for a minimum of 2 years. Postoperative knee laxity was evaluated with the Lachman test, pivot-shift test, and KT-1000 arthrometer. Functional evaluations were performed by use of the Lysholm score and the Tegner activity scale. On anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs, the measured diameters of the femoral tunnel at 1 year after surgery were compared with the diameter of the reamer used at surgery. The measured diameters of the tibial tunnel at 1 year after surgery were compared with those taken immediately after surgery. Results: The mean KT-1000 arthrometer laxity measurement was 1.5 ± 1.8 mm in the fixed-loop group and 1.2 ± 2.3 mm in the adjustable-loop group (P = .530). Results of postoperative knee laxity evaluations and functional outcomes from both groups showed no statistically significant differences. However, the fixed-loop group showed significantly better stability in the pivot-shift test than did the adjustable-loop group (P = .018). On AP radiographs, the mean diameter of the femoral and tibial tunnels increased by 42.2% ± 15.9% and 37.0% ± 17.8%, respectively, in the fixed-loop group and by 43.0% ± 15.4% and 36.8% ± 18.2% in the adjustable-loop group. On lateral radiographs, the mean diameter of the femoral and tibial tunnels increased by 38.1% ± 14.8% and 39.9% ± 13.8%, respectively, in the fixed-loop group and by 35.8% ± 12.2% and 38.1% ± 21.0% in the adjustable-loop group. No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in postoperative femoral and tibial tunnel widening on AP radiographs (P = .801 and .951, respectively) or lateral radiographs (P = .422 and .621, respectively). Conclusion: Compared with femoral fixation by use of the fixed-loop device, femoral fixation by use of the adjustable-loop device showed similar clinical outcomes but did not reduce tunnel widening after hamstring ACL reconstructions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ellipticity of the femoral tunnel aperture, which is considered to better restore the native anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) footprint after ACL reconstruction, is different according to the femoral tunneling technique used. How much of the femoral tunnel aperture is filled with graft in different tunneling techniques has yet to be evaluated. Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the graft filling area and graft position within the femoral tunnel aperture in ACL reconstruction using the transportal (TP) and outside-in (OI) techniques. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A total of 70 patients were randomized to undergo double-bundle ACL reconstruction using either the TP (n = 35) or OI (n = 35) technique. The aperture filling was evaluated by calculating the ratio of the cross-sectional area of the graft to that of the femoral tunnel, and the graft center position within the tunnel was assessed using immediate postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Results: The cross-sectional area of the femoral anteromedial (AM) tunnel aperture in the TP group (605.5 6 112.7 mm2 ) was larger than that in the OI group (537.9 ± 126.8 mm2 ). The cross-sectional area of the femoral posterolateral (PL) tunnel aperture in the TP group (369.9 6 88.3 mm2 ) did not differ significantly from that of the OI group (387.9 ± 87.0 mm2 ). The grafts filled only 52.0% of the AM tunnel and 55.3% of the PL tunnel in the TP group, compared with 54.9% of the AM tunnel and 54.4% of the PL tunnel in the OI group, but there was no statistically significant difference (P . .05). The AM graft center was positioned 1.7 ± 0.6 mm from the center of the tunnel aperture in the TP group and 1.6 ± 0.5 mm in the OI group, and the PL graft center was positioned 1.4 6 0.4 mm from the center in the TP group and 1.3 ± 0.4 mm in the OI group, with no significant intergroup differences (P = .406 and P = .629, respectively). In the OI group, the PL graft center was positioned more perpendicular to the Blumensaat line in relation to the tunnel aperture center (210.8 ± 7.6) compared with the TP group (24.0 ± 11.8) (P = .04). Conclusion: The grafts did not fill the tunnel aperture area in either group, and the centers of the grafts differed slightly from the centers of the tunnel apertures. The finding of eccentric graft positioning in the tunnel with condensation in a particular direction in each technique might suggest the necessity of an underreamed femoral tunnel for graft. In addition, it may be useful to standardize the starting position of the femoral tunnel according to anatomic landmarks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background:The desire to perform independent femoral drilling in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has prompted interest in both the transportal (TP) and outside-in (OI) techniques. However, there have been no in vivo studies on the differences in femoral aperture shape between the 2 techniques.Purpose:To evaluate the femoral tunnel aperture shape and femoral tunnel position between ACL reconstruction using the TP and OI techniques.Study Design:Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.Methods:A total of 80 patients were randomized to undergo double-bundle ACL reconstruction using either the TP (n = 40) or OI (n = 40) technique. The femoral tunnel aperture shape (height/width ratio), aperture axis angle (angle between the aperture axis and femoral shaft axis), and femoral tunnel position were assessed by computed tomography.Results:The mean height/width ratio of the anteromedial (AM) femoral tunnels in the TP group (1.35 ± 0.16) was significantly more ellipsoidal than that in the OI group (1.22 ± 0.16) (P = .008). There was no difference between the 2 groups in the posterolateral (PL) tunnels (TP, 1.32 ± 0.23; OI, 1.35 ± 0.29; P = .99). The mean aperture axis angle of the PL femoral tunnels in the OI group was significantly more perpendicular to the femoral shaft axis and had a more variable range than that in the TP group (P = .007). The mean PL femoral tunnel position in the OI group was significantly shallower and a little higher than that in the TP group (P = .006).Conclusion:The TP technique revealed a more ellipsoidal AM femoral tunnel aperture than the OI technique. The mean PL femoral tunnel position in the OI group was significantly shallower than that in the TP group, with a more variable and more perpendicular aperture axis angle to the femoral shaft axis.Clinical Relevance:The TP technique might be more advantageous than the OI technique in terms of graft coverage, with a more ellipsoidal AM femoral tunnel and more horizontal and consistent PL aperture axis angle. In addition, it may be useful to consider the shallower PL femoral tunnel positions created with the OI technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background:Previous 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) studies of knees after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have compared femoral tunnel positions obtained using the transtibial and anteromedial drilling techniques. This study used postoperative in vivo 3D CT analysis to compare the locations of the femoral tunnel aperture among 3 drilling techniques used in ACL reconstruction: transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in.Hypothesis:The use of the transtibial drilling technique might result in a less anatomically accurate femoral tunnel placement than the anteromedial portal and outside-in techniques.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:Immediate postoperative in vivo 3D CT was used to assess the location of the femoral tunnel aperture in 153 patients who underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction using the transtibial (n = 42), anteromedial portal (n = 73), or outside-in (n = 38) techniques. Femoral tunnel positions were measured by an anatomic coordinate axis method in the low-to-high and deep-to-shallow directions of the distal femur at 90° of knee flexion.Results:The low-to-high femoral tunnel positions were significantly higher in the transtibial group than in the anteromedial portal (P < .001) and outside-in (P < .001) groups. There were no differences among the 3 groups in the deep-to-shallow femoral tunnel positions (P = .773).Conclusion:The transtibial technique of anatomic reconstruction resulted in more highly positioned femoral tunnels in the low-to-high direction than did the anteromedial portal and outside-in techniques. However, no significant differences in the femoral tunnel location were observed in the deep-to-shallow direction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]