1. 44 - Clinical Effectiveness of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Inlay: a 6-month Randomized Controlled Trial.
- Author
-
Shin, Y., Song, S., and Kim, D.
- Subjects
- *
RANDOMIZED controlled trials , *THERAPEUTIC use of lithium , *CLINICAL trials , *FRACTURE mechanics , *MILLING-machines , *DESIGN software - Abstract
The purpose of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to evaluate and compare the clinical effectiveness of two lithium disilicate CAD/CAM blocks (Amber Mill, Hass, Korea and E.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Lichtenstein) in class II inlay restorations. This study was a randomized, double-blind clinical trial, and followed the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement and. Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 36 patients who had two proximal caries-affected teeth were included and received a class II CAD/CAM ceramic inlay on each tooth. Each restoration was designed with CEREC software (Dentsply Sirona, Germany) and manufactured by a CEREC MC XL (Dentsply Sirona, Germany) milling machine. One was made with Amber Mill and the other was made with e.max CAD according to the allocation table. The restorations were cemented with resin cement (Rely-X Ultimate, 3 M ESPE, US). They were independently evaluated by two examiners during regularly scheduled maintenance appointments according to the FDI criteria. Primary endpoint was fracture and retention of material, and secondary endpoint were as follows: surface luster, surface and margin staining, color and translucency, esthetic anatomical form, marginal adaptation, radiographic examination, patient's view, postoperative sensitivity, recurrence of caries, periodontal response and adjacent mucosa. Statistical analysis was carried out with SPSS 23 software (SPSS, Chicago, USA). The material groups for each category were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. 33 patients with 66 restorations were evaluated after 1 month, and 25 patients were evaluated after 6 months after the intervention. There was no failure in any restoration during the 6 months. Significant difference was observed only in radiographic examination among 17 evaluation categories of FDI criteria between two materials (p<0.05). Within the limitations of this study, both Amber Mill and e.max CAD demonstrated excellent clinical performance in class II inlay restorations during a 6-month period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF