Search

Introduction: ESG reduces gastric lumen similar to LSG and induces significant weight loss. However, the metabolic and physiological alteration after ESG is not fully understood. We aim to study the gastrointestinal hormone changes after ESG and compared it with LSG. Methods: We conducted a prospective pilot study comparing ESG and LSG at two centers in Spain. We administered a standard test meal after an overnight fast, and collected blood samples before and after meal. We measured the levels of ghrelin, GLP-1, peptide-YY, insulin, leptin, and adiponectin. We evaluated the hormone profile and weight changes (%TBWL) at baseline and at 6 months after the procedure. Results: Twenty-four patients were recruited (ESG-12, LSG-12). The baseline age, sex, BMI, and fasting hormone levels were similar between the groups. At 6-month post-ESG, there was a significant decline in the leptin levels. We found a trend towards a decrease in insulin levels and improvement in insulin secretory pattern. We did not observe any change in fasting ghrelin levels, GLP-1, and PYY. At 6 months, LSG induced a significant reduction in the ghrelin, and leptin levels, and increase in peptide-YY, and adiponectin levels, respectively. A trend towards an increase in GLP-1 level was noted. However, no change in insulin was observed. LSG achieved greater %TBWL (24.4 vs. 13.3, p < 0.001) and significantly change in ghrelin, PYY, and adiponectin levels at 6 months compared to ESG. Conclusion: ESG induced gut hormone changes differently as compared to LSG. ESG prevented a compensatory rise in ghrelin and promoted beneficial changes in the insulin secretory pattern with weight loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is an effective treatment option for obesity. However, data comparing its efficacy to bariatric surgery are scarce. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of ESG with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic greater curve plication (LGCP) at 2 years. METHODS : We reviewed 353 patient records and identified 296 patients who underwent ESG (n = 199), LSG (n = 61), and LGCP (n = 36) at four centers in Spain between 2014 and 2016. We compared their total body weight loss (%TBWL) and safety over 2 years. A linear mixed model (LMM) was used to analyze repeated measures of weight loss outcomes at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months to compare the three procedures. RESULTS : Among the 296 patients, 210 (ESG 135, LSG 43, LGCP 32) completed 1 year of follow-up and 102 (ESG 46, LSG 34, LGCP 22) reached 2 years. Their mean (standard deviation [SD]) body mass index (BMI) was 39.6 (4.8) kg/m 2 . There were no differences in age, sex, or BMI between the groups. In LMM analysis, adjusting for age, sex, and initial BMI, we found ESG had a significantly lower TBWL, %TBWL, and BMI decline compared with LSG and LGCP at all time points ( P  = 0.001). The adjusted mean %TBWL at 2 years for ESG, LSG, and LGCP were 18.5 %, 28.3 %, and 26.9 %, respectively. However, ESG, when compared with LSG and LGCP, had a shorter inpatient stay (1 vs. 3 vs. 3 days; P  < 0.001) and lower complication rate (0.5 % vs. 4.9 % vs. 8.3 %; P  = 0.006). CONCLUSION : All three procedures induced significant weight loss in obese patients. Although the weight loss was lower with ESG compared with other techniques, it displayed a better safety profile and shorter hospital stay., Competing Interests: G. Lopez-Nava is a consultant for Apollo Endosurgery and USGI Medical, USA. E. Espinett Coll is a consultant for Apollo Endosurgery. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)