Search

Introduction: The objectives of this study was to conduct an updated comparative audit involving a larger and more representative group of accredited chiropractic programs in order to determine if (i) if there has been any changes in the delivery of JEB curricula since the first audit was conducted in 2010, and (ii) provide recommendations that could lead toward a standardized or model JEB curriculum worldwide. Methods: This study was approved by the ERB of the University of South Wales. Twenty-one chiropractic programs agreed to provide JEB course outlines for review. Results: A total of 88 different course outlines, which listed 83 different topics pertaining to JEB course content, were submitted for review. Conclusion: The results of this comparative audit revealed there has been an increase in the variability of JEB course content taught to students over time. Recommendations are provided for the next steps that could lead toward a standardized or model JEB curriculum curricula. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Education Policy Analysis Archives / Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas / Arquivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas is the property of Educational Policy Analysis Archives & Education Review and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Education Policy Analysis Archives / Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas / Arquivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas is the property of Educational Policy Analysis Archives & Education Review and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Estudios Gerenciales is the property of Universidad ICESI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Ciencias Sociales (13159518) is the property of Revista de Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad del Zulia Venezuela and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In Spain during the design boom of the 1980s, the majority of designers worked on their own or with a single partner. Groups with more members were rare. This trend contrasts with the development of the profession in Great Britain, where design groups in this period were often large consultancies with a strong and hierarchical internal organization. Even so, one collective stands out in Spain--La Nave, a large, multi-disciplinary design group (eleven members) with an anarchical structure. In this studio, different projects were developed either individually or by subgroups; by new, improvised teams; or by the entire collective working together. This 'system' contrasts with that of small Spanish individual studios and that of the big British super-organized consultancies (though parallels can be drawn with a new wave of British groups that emerged during the economic recession of the early 1990s). This article seeks to examine the working relations of La Nave in the 'local' context of Valencia, at the same time comparing it with other ostensibly similar groups. I will examine the extent to which La Nave can be considered a unique experiment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]