Search

Copyright of Revista Española de Cardiología (18855857) is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article discusses a study on the assessment of selection bias (SB) in registries of patients with acute coronary syndrome. It mentions that standards for conducting and reporting methods and results for patient registries (PRs) do not exist. Results of the study, which involved 17 hospitals in Spain, shows that 1439 eligible patients were not initially recorded in PRs. It stresses the need for researchers to make sure that the risk of selection and information bias is minimal when designing and executing PRs.

Copyright of Revista Española de Cardiología (18855857) is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Española de Cardiología (18855857) is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) is a heterogeneous entity with uncertain prognosis., Objectives: This study sought to develop and validate a prediction model of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and to identify LVNC cases without events during long-term follow-up., Methods: This is a retrospective longitudinal multicenter cohort study of consecutive patients fulfilling LVNC criteria by echocardiography or cardiovascular magnetic resonance. MACE were defined as heart failure (HF), ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), systemic embolisms, or all-cause mortality., Results: A total of 585 patients were included (45 ± 20 years of age, 57% male). LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was 48% ± 17%, and 18% presented late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). After a median follow-up of 5.1 years, MACE occurred in 223 (38%) patients: HF in 110 (19%), VAs in 87 (15%), systemic embolisms in 18 (3%), and 34 (6%) died. LVEF was the main variable independently associated with MACE (P < 0.05). LGE was associated with HF and VAs in patients with LVEF >35% (P < 0.05). A prediction model of MACE was developed using Cox regression, composed by age, sex, electrocardiography, cardiovascular risk factors, LVEF, and family aggregation. C-index was 0.72 (95% confidence interval: 0.67-0.75) in the derivation cohort and 0.72 (95% confidence interval: 0.71-0.73) in an external validation cohort. Patients with no electrocardiogram abnormalities, LVEF ≥50%, no LGE, and negative family screening presented no MACE at follow-up., Conclusions: LVNC is associated with an increased risk of heart failure and ventricular arrhythmias. LVEF is the variable most strongly associated with MACE; however, LGE confers additional risk in patients without severe systolic dysfunction. A risk prediction model is developed and validated to guide management., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The project was partially funded by a grant from the Catalan Society of Cardiology (Barcelona, Spain). Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca (Murcia, Spain) was supported by a grant from the Foundation Marató TV3 (218/C/2015) (Barcelona, Spain). Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe (Valencia, Spain) was partially supported by Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (“Unión Europea, Una forma de hacer Europa”) (Madrid, Spain) and the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (La Fe Biobank PT17/0015/0043) (Madrid, Spain). Dr Guala was supported by funding from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (IJC2018-037349-I) (Madrid, Spain). Dr La Mura was supported by a research grant from the Cardiopath PhD program (Naples, Italy). Prof de la Pompa was supported by grants PID2019-104776RB-I00 and CB16/11/00399 (CIBER CV) from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities. Dr Bayes-Genis was supported by grants from CIBER Cardiovascular (CB16/11/00403 and 16/11/00420) (Madrid, Spain) and AdvanceCat 2014-2020 (Barcelona, Spain); and has received advisory board and lecture fees from Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Vifor, Roche Diagnostics, and Critical Diagnostics. Dr Pontone has received speaker honorarium and/or institutional research grants from GE Healthcare, Bracco, Boehringer Ingelheim, and HeartFlow. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Syncope in patients with mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) can be due to potentially serious arrhythmic causes. However, there is no clear consensus on the best way to manage these patients., Objectives: The objectives of this study were to determine the causes of syncope and assess the diagnostic yield and safety of a stepwise workup protocol in this population., Methods: This was a prospective observational study. A stepwise workup protocol was applied to patients with LVEF 35%-50% and unexplained syncope after the initial assessment (step 1)., Results: One hundred four patients were included {median age 75.6 years; (interquartile range [IQR] 67.6-81.2 years); median LVEF 45% (IQR 40%-48%); median follow-up 2.0 years (IQR 0.7-3.3 years). In 71 patients (68.3%), a diagnosis was reached: 55 (77.5%) in step 2 (hospital admission and electrophysiology study) and 16 (36.5%) in step 3 (implantable cardiac monitor). Arrhythmic causes were the most common etiology (45.2% auriculoventricular block and 9.6% ventricular tachycardia). Sixty patients (57.7%) required the implantation of a cardiac device and 11 had a defibrillation function. Patients diagnosed in step 3 had a higher global risk of recurrence of syncope (hazard ratio 6.5; 95% confidence interval 2.3-18.0). The mortality rate was 8.1 per 100 person-years, and the sudden or unknown death rate was 0.9 per 100 person-years., Conclusion: In patients with mid-range left ventricular dysfunction and syncope of unknown cause, a systematic diagnostic strategy based on electrophysiology study and/or implantable cardiac monitor implantation allows a diagnosis to be reached in a high proportion of cases and guides the treatment. Arrhythmia is the most common cause of syncope in this population, particularly auriculoventricular block., (Copyright © 2020 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Severe aortic stenosis (AoS) is considered a primary cause of syncope. However, other mechanisms may be present in these patients and accurate diagnosis can have important clinical implications. The aim of this study is to assess the different etiologies of syncope in patients with severe AoS and the impact on prognosis of attaining a certain or highly probable diagnosis for the syncope., Methods: Out of a cohort of 331 patients with AoS and syncope, 61 had severe AoS and were included in the study. Main cause of syncope and adverse cardiac events were assessed., Results: In 40 patients (65.6%), we reached a certain or highly probable diagnosis of the main cause of the syncope. AoS was considered the primary cause of the syncope in only 7 patients (17.5% of the patients with known etiology). Atrioventricular block (14 patients, 35.0%) and vasovagal syncope (6 patients, 15.0%) were the most frequently diagnosed causes. The presence of a known cause for syncope during the admission was not associated with a lower incidence of recurrence during follow-up (hazard ratio [HR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-2.40). Syncope of unknown etiology was independently associated with greater mortality during 1-year follow-up (HR 5.4, 95% CI 1.3-21.6) and 3-year follow-up (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.2-10.3)., Conclusions: In a high proportion of patients with severe AoS admitted for syncope, the valvulopathy was not the main cause of the syncope. Syncope in two-thirds of this population was caused by either bradyarrhythmia or reflex causes. Syncope of unknown cause was associated with increased short- and medium-term mortality, independently from treatment of the valve disease. An exhaustive work-up should be conducted to determine the main cause for syncope., (Copyright © 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) and the GLP-1 analog exenatide activate different cardioprotective pathways and may have additive effects on infarct size (IS). Here, we aimed to assess the efficacy of RIC as compared with sham procedure, and of exenatide, as compared with placebo, and the interaction between both, to reduce IS in humans. We designed a two-by-two factorial, randomized controlled, blinded, multicenter, clinical trial. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) within 6 h of symptoms were randomized to RIC or sham procedure and exenatide or matching placebo. The primary outcome was IS measured by late gadolinium enhancement in cardiac magnetic resonance performed 3-7 days after PPCI. The secondary outcomes were myocardial salvage index, transmurality index, left ventricular ejection fraction and relative microvascular obstruction volume. A total of 378 patients were randomly allocated, and after applying exclusion criteria, 222 patients were available for analysis. There were no significant interactions between the two randomization factors on the primary or secondary outcomes. IS was similar between groups for the RIC (24 ± 11.8% in the RIC group vs 23.7 ± 10.9% in the sham group, P = 0.827) and the exenatide hypotheses (25.1 ± 11.5% in the exenatide group vs 22.5 ± 10.9% in the placebo group, P = 0.092). There were no effects with either RIC or exenatide on the secondary outcomes. Unexpected adverse events or side effects of RIC and exenatide were not observed. In conclusion, neither RIC nor exenatide, or its combination, were able to reduce IS in STEMI patients when administered as an adjunct to PPCI.

Although revascularisation in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) is associated with better outcomes, its impact in older adult patients is unclear. This is a retrospective analyses of three national NSTEACS registries conducted during the past decade in Spain. Patients aged 75 years and older were included: DESCARTES (DES; year 2002; n =534), MASCARA (MAS; 2005; n =1736) and DIOCLES (DIO; 2012; n =593). The adjusted association between revascularisation and total (inhospital and 6-month) mortality was estimated by two-stage meta-analysis (pooled effect across the three registries with inverse-variability weights) and one-stage meta-analysis (multilevel model with random effects across studies). The impact of revascularisation was assessed comparing the observed and the expected mortality based on a logistic regression model in the pooled database. Although revascularisation was associated with a lower risk of mortality in meta-analyses (two-stage: odds ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.29-0.67; one-stage: odds ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.81) and the revascularisation rate increased steadily from 2002 (DES 14.2%) to 2012 (DIO 43.7%), its impact was not patent across registries, probably because this increase was concentrated in low and medium-risk GRACE strata (tertile 1, 2 and 3: MAS 59%, 20% and 6%; DIO 64%, 39% and 19%, respectively). In conclusion, a consistent increase of revascularisation in NSTEACS in older adults was not followed by a decrease in mortality at 6 months, probably because the impact of this strategy is limited to the higher risk population, the stratum with the lowest revascularisation rate in real life.

The Cardiology of the Future is a project of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC) whose objectives are as follows: to define the action policies of the SEC; to analyze the trends and changes in the environment that will influence the practice of cardiology in Spain; to define the profile of the cardiologists needed in the future; to propose policies to achieve the objectives resulting from the identified needs; and to identify the role of the SEC in the development and implementation of these policies. This article describes the methodology and the most relevant findings of the final report of this project and the strategic lines to be developed by the SEC in the immediate future, resulting from the analysis performed., (Copyright © 2019 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate cost-effectiveness of transfemoral TAVR vs surgical replacement (SAVR) and its determinants in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and comparable risk., Methods: Patients were prospectively recruited in 6 Spanish hospitals and followed up over one year. We estimated adjusted incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) (Euros per quality-adjusted life-year [QALY] gained) using a net-benefit approach and assessed the determinants of incremental net-benefit of TAVR vs SAVR., Results: We analyzed data on 207 patients: 58, 87 and 62 in the Edwards SAPIEN (ES) TAVR, Medtronic-CoreValve (MC) TAVR and SAVR groups respectively. Average cost per patient of ES-TAVR was €8800 higher than SAVR and the gain in QALY was 0.036. The ICER was €148,525/QALY. The cost of MC-TAVR was €9729 higher than SAVR and the QALY difference was -0.011 (dominated). Results substantially changed in the following conditions: 1) in patients with high preoperative serum creatinine the ICERs were €18,302/QALY and €179,618/QALY for ES and MC-TAVR respectively; 2) a 30% reduction in the cost of TAVR devices decreased the ICER for ES-TAVR to €32,955/QALY; and 3) imputing hospitalization costs from other European countries leads to TAVR being dominant., Conclusions: In countries with relatively low health care costs TAVR is not likely to be cost-effective compared to SAVR in patients with intermediate risk for surgery, mainly because of the high cost of the valve compared to the cost of hospitalization. TAVR could be cost-effective in specific subgroups and in countries with higher hospitalization costs., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aims: To determine the prevalence of aortic valve sclerosis (ASC) and stenosis (AS) in the elderly in a Mediterranean area and to identify associated clinical factors., Methods and Results: Population cross-sectional study in a random sample of 1068 people ≥65 years in a Mediterranean area. ASC was categorized as absent, mild-to-moderate, or moderate-to-severe depending on the severity of thickening and calcification. The relation between the severity of ASC and potential risk factors was assessed by multinomial logistic regression analysis. Some degree of thickening and/or calcification was present in 45.4%, of the sample, 73.5% in >85 years. AS prevalence was 3% for the total cohort and 7.4% in >85 years. Adjusting for gender it was found that age, smoking habit, hypertension, waist circumference, and ankle-brachial index <0.9 were associated with degrees of ASC. Except for waist circumference, there was a gradient between the magnitude of association and the severity of ASC. The OR for age was 1.56 (95% CI 1.39-1.76) for mild-to-moderate ASC and 2.03 (95% CI 1.72-2.4) for moderate-to-severe ASC, and for smoking habit 1.59 (95% CI 1.08-2.34) for mild-to-moderate ASC and 2.13 (95% CI 1.19-3.78) for moderate-to-severe ASC. Diabetes and renal impairment were associated with advanced but not with early stages of ASC., Conclusions: The prevalence of ASC and AS in people ≥65 years is similar to that reported in other regions. The gradient in the association of cardiovascular risk factors with the severity of ASC suggests that they may be causally implied in the pathogenesis of the disease.

Background: Although the GRACE risk scores (RS) are the preferred scoring system for risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes (ACS), little is known whether these RS still maintain their performance in the current era. We aimed to investigate this issue in a contemporary population with ACS., Methods: The study population composed of patients enrolled in the MASCARA national registry. The GRACE RS were calculated for each patient. Discrimination and calibration were evaluated with the C statistic and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, in the whole population and according to the type of ACS, risk strata, and whether the patient had a history of diabetes and/or chronic renal failure. We determined if left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) provides incremental prognostic information above that established by the RS and whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during admission affects the performance of the score for predicting 6-month mortality., Results: The 5,985 patients constituted the validation cohort for the in-hospital mortality RS and 5,635 the validation cohort for the 6-month mortality RS. Overall, both GRACE RS demonstrated excellent discrimination (C > 0.80) and calibration (all P values in Hosmer-Lemeshow >.1). Although similar results were seen in all subgroups, the 6-month mortality RS performed significantly less well in patients undergoing PCI compared to those patients who did not (C = 0.73 vs 0.76, P < .004). Adding LVEF to the RS did not convey significant prognostic information., Conclusions: The GRACE RS for predicting in-hospital and 6-month mortality still maintain their excellent performance in a contemporary cohort of patients with ACS. Further studies are needed to investigate the performance of the 6-month mortality GRACE score in patients undergoing in-hospital PCI. Left ventricular ejection fraction did not convey significant information over that provided by the RS., (Copyright © 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) model provides a risk score that predicts the likelihood of major bleeding in patients hospitalized for non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. The aim of the present work was to evaluate the performance of this model in a contemporary cohort of patients hospitalized for non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction in Spain., Methods and Results: The study subjects were 782 consecutive patients admitted to our center between February 2004 and June 2009 with non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. For each patient, we calculated the CRUSADE risk score and evaluated its discrimination and calibration by the C statistic and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, respectively. The performance of the CRUSADE risk score was evaluated for the patient population as a whole and for groups of patients treated with or without >or=2 antithrombotic medications and who underwent cardiac catheterization or not. The median CRUSADE score was 30 points (range, 18 to 45). A total of 657 patients (84%) were treated with >or=2 antithrombotic, of whom 609 (92.7%) underwent cardiac catheterization. The overall incidence of major bleeding was 9.5%. This incidence increased with the risk category: very low, 1.5%; low, 4.3%; moderate, 7.8%; high, 11.8%; and very high, 28.9% (P<0.001). For the patients as a whole, for the groups treated with or without >or=2 antithrombotics, and for the subgroup treated with >or=2 antithrombotics who did or did not undergo cardiac catheterization, the CRUSADE score showed adequate calibration and excellent discriminatory capacity (Hosmer-Lemeshow P>0.3 and C values of 0.82, 0.80, 0.70, and 0.80, respectively). However, it showed little capacity to discriminate bleeding risk in patients treated with >or=2 antithrombotics who did not undergo cardiac catheterization (C=0.56)., Conclusions: The CRUSADE risk score was generally validated and found to be useful in a Spanish cohort of patients treated with or without >or=2 antithrombotics and in those treated with or without >or=2 antithrombotics who underwent cardiac catheterization. More studies are needed to clarify the validity of the CRUSADE score in the subgroup treated with >or=2 antithrombotics who do not undergo cardiac catheterization.

Introduction and Objectives: To investigate the clinical characteristics and treatment of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), and to determine the effects of an early invasive strategy (EIS) in non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTEACS) and of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-elevation ACS (STEACS)., Methods: Data were collected prospectively for 9 months during 2004-2005 from 50 hospitals, which were randomly selected according to the level of care provided. In addition, follow-up data on mortality and readmission for ACS were collected for 6 months. The adjusted effects of different reperfusion strategies were analyzed., Results: After checking data quality, the analysis included data from 32 hospitals, which covered 7923 coronary events (4431 [56%] STEACS, 3034 [38%] NSTEACS and 458 [6%] unclassified ACS) in 7251 patients. Compared with previous studies, the use of primary PCI in STEACS had increased markedly (from 10.7% to 36.8% of patients undergoing reperfusion), as had the use of EIS in NSTEACS (from 11.1% to 19.6%). Overall in-hospital mortality was 5.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.1%-6.2%); for STEACS it was 7.6% (95% CI, 6.7%-8.7%), for NSTEACS 3.9% (95% CI, 3.3%-4.6%), and for unclassified ACS 8.8% (95% CI, 6.2%-12.2%). In the population as a whole, there was no association between prognosis (i.e., 6-month mortality) and EIS in NSTEACS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.94; 95% CI, 0.66-1.3) or between prognosis and primary PCI in STEACS (HR=1; 95% CI, 0.7-1.5). Findings for mortality and rehospitalization for ACS at 6 months were similar., Conclusions: Data for 2004-2005 demonstrated a marked increase in the use of invasive procedures. However, the procedures employed were poorly matched to the patients' baseline risk.

Introduction and Objectives: Previous studies suggest that the effectiveness of coronary surgery is influenced by the type of management at the healthcare centre where the intervention is performed. The present study assessed the risk-adjusted hospital mortality of coronary surgery in the Catalan healthcare system in hospitals under either private or public management., Methods: We carried out a prospective study of all consecutive patients receiving a first coronary artery bypass graft, with public financial support, in a period of 2 years at 5 hospitals under either public or private management. Preoperative risk was assessed using the EuroSCORE and Catalan Agency for Health Technology Assessment (CAHTA) predictive models., Results: Overall, 1605 patients underwent interventions, 21% of which were at private hospitals. The percentage of patients undergoing non-elective surgery was higher at private hospitals (64% vs 50%), as was the percentage needing intravenous nitrates (17% vs 11%) and the percentage in functional class IV (20% vs 11%). The odds ratio for in-hospital mortality in private compared with public hospitals was 0.56 (95% CI, 0.29-1.06) when adjusted for EuroSCORE, 0.56 (95% CI, 0.29-1.07) when adjusted for CAHTA score, and 0.43 (95% CI, 0.21-0.87) when adjusted for patient characteristics. The mortality observed, 4.8% (95% CI 3.8-5.6), was not significantly higher than that predicted., Conclusions: a) Hospital mortality was equivalent to or lower than that expected after adjustment for the 2 risk scores; b) after adjustment for baseline patient characteristics, the results favored privately managed centers; and c) comparison with previous results suggests that coronary surgery effectiveness has improved in recent years.