Search

Santolina is a clear example of a genus lying in an alpha‐taxonomic status, with species accepted only based on qualitative morphological descriptions. In particular, taxonomic issues still need to be resolved for Santolina populations from southern France and north‐eastern Spain, and so, we carried out an integrative taxonomic study involving morphometrics, cypsela morphometrics, niche overlap, and phylogenetic analysis based on six plastid markers (trnH‐psbA, trnL‐trnF, trnQ‐rps16, rps15‐ycf1, psbM‐trnD, and trnS‐trnG). Our results revealed that the current taxonomic circumscription is not adequate. In particular, the Santolina populations at the foothills of eastern Pyrenees, previously included in the variability of Santolina benthamiana, have to be considered as a distinct species, namely, Santolina intricata. In addition, despite their high phylogenetic relatedness, S. benthamiana s.str. and Santolina ericoides can still be considered as distinct species due to clear morphological and ecological differentiation. Finally, we demonstrated that three different subspecies can be recognized in Santolina decumbens, a species endemic to Provence. For one of these subspecies, due to its extremely restricted distribution range, conservation issues are pointed out. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A nomenclatural revision of the Santolina chamaecyparissus species complex is presented. A detailed survey of original material for all names applied to members of the complex was performed, and 28 names are newly typified. The current usage of the names S. villosa and S. ericoides, relating to some Spanish and French populations, is discussed. The name S. villosa is applied to a taxon endemic to Spain, whereas S. ericoides is applied to those Spanish and French populations often traditionally referred to S. villosa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]