1. Airborne olive pollen counts are not representative of exposure to the major olive allergen Ole e 1.
- Author
-
Galan C, Antunes C, Brandao R, Torres C, Garcia-Mozo H, Caeiro E, Ferro R, Prank M, Sofiev M, Albertini R, Berger U, Cecchi L, Celenk S, Grewling Ł, Jackowiak B, Jäger S, Kennedy R, Rantio-Lehtimäki A, Reese G, Sauliene I, Smith M, Thibaudon M, Weber B, Weichenmeier I, Pusch G, and Buters JT
- Subjects
- Environmental Exposure statistics & numerical data, Environmental Monitoring, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Models, Statistical, Portugal, Seasons, Spain, Weather, Allergens analysis, Antigens, Plant analysis, Environmental Exposure analysis, Plant Proteins analysis, Pollen
- Abstract
Pollen is routinely monitored, but it is unknown whether pollen counts represent allergen exposure. We therefore simultaneously determined olive pollen and Ole e 1 in ambient air in Córdoba, Spain, and Évora, Portugal, using Hirst-type traps for pollen and high-volume cascade impactors for allergen. Pollen from different days released 12-fold different amounts of Ole e 1 per pollen (both locations P < 0.001). Average allergen release from pollen (pollen potency) was much higher in Córdoba (3.9 pg Ole e 1/pollen) than in Évora (0.8 pg Ole e 1/pollen, P = 0.004). Indeed, yearly olive pollen counts in Córdoba were 2.4 times higher than in Évora, but Ole e 1 concentrations were 7.6 times higher. When modeling the origin of the pollen, >40% of Ole e 1 exposure in Évora was explained by high-potency pollen originating from the south of Spain. Thus, olive pollen can vary substantially in allergen release, even though they are morphologically identical., (© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF