Search

Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of teledermoscopy as a diagnostic and triage method for suspected skin cancer lesions between Primary Care and Dermatology. To analyse the reduction in the number of referrals and estimate the savings achieved., Material and Methods: Concordance study on a non-randomised case series. Descriptive observational study of teleconsultations sent from two Health Centres (urban and rural) to the reference Dermatology service in Cordoba (Spain) between January 2017 and April 2019. The diagnoses proposed by Primary Care before and after the use of dermatoscopy, and the diagnosis of the Dermatologist, along with other epidemiological variables were collected. Descriptive analysis and concordance study were performed., Results: A total of 395 teleconsultations were made. The coefficient of agreement between the diagnoses of both specialists without using dermoscopy was 0.486. Using this technique the concordance was 0.641. A reduction in the number of referrals to Dermatology was 58%. A savings of 2,475€ in transfers by ambulance and 550 working hours were made. The most common diagnoses were basal cell carcinoma (20%; n=79) and seborrheic keratosis (15.2%; n=60)., Conclusions: The addition of dermoscopy increases diagnosis concordance. Teledermatology is a useful system for patient triage and for decreasing the demand for hospital care, with an inherent resources saving., (Copyright © 2020 Sociedad Española de Médicos de Atención Primaria (SEMERGEN). Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Objective: 1) To analyze the implementation of multidisciplinary care models in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients, 2) To define minimum and excellent standards of care., Methods: A survey was sent to clinicians who already performed multidisciplinary care or were in the process of undertaking it, asking: 1) Type of multidisciplinary care model implemented; 2) Degree, priority and feasibility of the implementation of quality standards in the structure, process and result for care. In 6 regional meetings the results of the survey were presented and discussed, and the ultimate priority of quality standards for care was defined. At a nominal meeting group, 11 experts (rheumatologists and dermatologists) analyzed the results of the survey and the regional meetings. With this information, they defined which standards of care are currently considered as minimum and which are excellent., Results: The simultaneous and parallel models of multidisciplinary care are those most widely implemented, but the implementation of quality standards is highly variable. In terms of structure it ranges from 22% to 74%, in those related to process from 17% to 54% and in the results from 2% to 28%. Of the 25 original quality standards for care, 9 were considered only minimum, 4 were excellent and 12 defined criteria for minimum level and others for excellence., Conclusions: The definition of minimum and excellent quality standards for care will help achieve the goal of multidisciplinary care for patients with PAs, which is the best healthcare possible., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Reumatología y Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología. All rights reserved.)