Search

Background Whether hyperkalaemia in CKD is chronic or transient, and whether this has different outcome implications, is not known. Methods This was an observational study of adults with CKD G3–5 from Stockholm, Sweden 2006–11. We examined individual trajectories of potassium from all measurements obtained through routine outpatient care. For each month of follow-up, we created a rolling assessment of the proportion of time in which potassium was abnormal during the previous 12 months. We defined patterns of hyperkalaemia as transient (≤50% of time during the previous year with potassium >5.0 mmol/L) and chronic (>50% of time with potassium >5.0 mmol/L), and examined whether previous hyperkalaemia pattern offers additional predictive value beyond that provided by the most recent (current) potassium value. Results We included 36 511 participants (56% women) with CKD G3–5 and median estimated glomerular filtration rate 46 mL/min/1.73 m2. Transient and chronic hyperkalaemia, respectively, were observed in 15% and 4% of patients with CKD G3a, and in 50% and 17% of patients with CKD G5. In fully adjusted models, transient (hazard ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.29–1.46) or chronic (1.16, 1.04–1.32) hyperkalaemia patterns, but not current hyperkalaemia, were associated with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), compared with normokalaemia. Transient hyperkalaemia (1.43, 1.35–1.52) and current potassium values, but not chronic hyperkalaemia, were associated with the risk of death. Conclusions Between 4% and 17% of patients with CKD G3–5 develop chronic hyperkalaemia. In general, hyperkalaemia predicted MACE and death; however, the lack of effect of current potassium on MACE when adjusted for the previous pattern, and the stronger effects on death than on MACE, lead us to question whether hyperkalaemia is causal in these relationships. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Whether to continue or stop mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) after an episode of hyperkalaemia is a challenge in clinical practice. While stopping MRA may prevent recurrent hyperkalaemias, it deprives patients of their cardioprotection. We here assessed the association between stopping vs. continuing MRA therapy after hyperkalaemia and the subsequent risks of adverse health events. Methods and results: Observational study from the Stockholm CREAtinine Measurements (SCREAM) project 2006–2018. We identified patients initiating MRA and surviving a first‐detected episode of hyperkalaemia (plasma potassium >5.0 mmol/L). Using target trial emulation methods, we assessed the association between stopping vs. continuing MRA within 6 months after hyperkalaemia and subsequent outcomes. The primary outcome was the composite of hospital admission with heart failure, stroke, myocardial infarction, or death. The secondary outcome was occurrence of another hyperkalaemia event. Among 39 518 patients initiating MRA, we identified 7366 who developed hyperkalaemia. Median age was 76 years, 45% were women and 69% had a history of heart failure. Following hyperkalaemia, 2222 (30%) discontinued treatment. Compared with continuing MRA, stopping therapy was associated with a lower 2‐year risk of recurrent hyperkalaemia [hazard ratio (HR) 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72–0.79], but a higher risk of the primary outcome (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.06–1.14). Similar results were observed in patients with heart failure, after censoring when treatment decision was changed, and across pre‐specified subgroups. Conclusions: Stopping MRA after an episode of hyperkalaemia was associated with reduced risk for recurrent hyperkalaemia, but higher risk of death or cardiovascular events. Recurrent hyperkalaemia was common in either strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Small-scale studies suggest that hyperkalaemia is a less threatening condition in chronic kidney disease (CKD), arguing adaptation/tolerance to potassium (K+) retention. This study formally evaluates this hypothesis by estimating the distribution of plasma K+ and its association with mortality across CKD stages. Methods This observational study included all patients undergoing plasma K+ testing in Stockholm during 2006–11. We randomly selected one K+ measurement per patient and constructed a cross-sectional cohort with mortality follow-up. Covariates included demographics, comorbidities, medications and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). We estimated K+ distribution and defined K+ ranges associated with 90-, 180- and 365-day mortality. Results Included were 831 760 participants, of which 70 403 (8.5%) had CKD G3 (eGFR <60–30 mL/min) and 8594 (1.1%) had CKD G4–G5 (eGFR <30 mL/min). About 66 317 deaths occurred within a year. Adjusted plasma K+ increased across worse CKD stages: from median 3.98 (95% confidence interval 3.49–4.59) for eGFR >90 to 4.43 (3.22–5.65) mmol/L for eGFR ≤15 mL/min/1.73 m2. The association between K+ and mortality was U-shaped, but it flattened at lower eGFR strata and shifted upwards. For instance, the range where the 90-day mortality risk increased by no more than 100% was 3.45–4.94 mmol/L in eGFR >60 mL/min, but was 3.36–5.18  in G3 and 3.26–5.53 mmol/L in G4–G5. In conclusion, CKD stage modifies K+ distribution and the ranges that predict mortality in the community. Conclusion Although this study supports the view that hyperkalaemia is better tolerated with worse CKD, it challenges the current use of a single optimal K+ range for all patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]