Search

Objective:To assess the impact of patient characteristics, patient-professional engagement, communication and context on the probability that healthcare professionals will discuss goals or priorities with older patients. Design:Secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from the 2014 Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Survey of Older Adults. Setting:11 western countries. Subjects:Community-dwelling adults, aged 55 or older. Main outcome measure:Assessment of goals and priorities. Results:The final sample size consisted of 17,222 respondents, 54% of whom reported an assessment of their goals and priorities (AGP) by healthcare professionals. In logistic regression model 1, which was used to analyse the entire population, the determinants found to have moderate to large effects on the likelihood of AGP were information exchange on stress, diet or exercise, or both. Country (living in Sweden) and continuity of care (no regular professional or organisation) had moderate to large negative effects on the likelihood of AGP. In model 2, which focussed on respondents who experienced continuity of care, country and information exchange on stress and lifestyle were the main determinants of AGP, with comparable odds ratios to model 1. Furthermore, a professional asking questions also increased the likelihood of AGP. Conclusions:Continuity of care and information exchange is associated with a higher probability of AGP, while people living in Sweden are less likely to experience these assessments. Further study is required to determine whether increasing information exchange and professionals asking more questions may improve goal setting with older patients.Key points  A patient goal-oriented approach can be beneficial for older patients with chronic conditions or multimorbidity; however, discussing goals with these patients is not a common practice.The likelihood of discussing goals varies by country, occurring most commonly in the USA, and least often in Sweden.Country-level differences in continuity of care and questions asked by a regularly visited professional affect the goal discussion probability.Patient characteristics, including age, have less impact than expected on the likelihood of sharing goals. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Previous studies have shown large heterogeneity in the progression of dementia, both within and between patients. This heterogeneity offers an opportunity to limit the global and individual burden of dementia through the identification of factors associated with slow disease progression in dementia. We explored the heterogeneity in dementia progression to detect disease, patient, and social context factors related to slow progression. Two longitudinal population-based cohort studies with follow-up across 12 years. 512 people with incident dementia from Stockholm (Sweden) contributed to the Kungsholmen Project and the Swedish National Study of Aging and Care in Kungsholmen. We measured cognition using the Mini-Mental State Examination and daily functioning using the Katz Activities of Daily Living Scale. Latent classes of trajectories were identified using a bivariate growth mixture model. We then used bias-corrected logistic regression to identify predictors of slower progression. Two distinct groups of progression were identified; 76% (n = 394) of the people with dementia exhibited relatively slow progression on both cognition and daily functioning, whereas 24% (n = 118) demonstrated more rapid worsening on both outcomes. Predictors of slower disease progression were Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia type [odds ratio (OR) 2.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-3.71], lower age (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83-0.94), fewer comorbidities (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.90), and a stronger social network (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.01-2.93). Lower age, AD dementia type, fewer comorbidities, and a good social network appear to be associated with slow cognitive and functional decline. These factors may help to improve the counseling of patients and caregivers and to optimize the planning of care in dementia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To develop survival prediction tables to inform physicians and patients about survival probabilities after the diagnosis of dementia and to determine whether survival after dementia diagnosis can be predicted with good accuracy., Methods: We conducted a nationwide registry-linkage study including 829 health centers, i.e., all memory clinics and ≈75% of primary care facilities, across Sweden. Data including cognitive function from 50,076 people with incident dementia diagnoses ≥65 years of age and registered with the Swedish Dementia Register in 2007 to 2015 were used, with a maximum follow-up of 9.7 years for survival until 2016. Sociodemographic factors, comorbidity burden, medication use, and dates of death were obtained from nationwide registries. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to create tables depicting 3-year survival probabilities for different risk factor profiles., Results: By August 2016, 20,828 (41.6%) patients in our cohort had died. Median survival time from diagnosis of dementia was 5.1 (interquartile range 2.9-8.0) years for women and 4.3 (interquartile range 2.3-7.0) years for men. Predictors of mortality were higher age, male sex, increased comorbidity burden and lower cognitive function at diagnosis, a diagnosis of non-Alzheimer dementia, living alone, and using more medications. The developed prediction tables yielded c indexes of 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-0.71) to 0.72 (95% CI 0.71-0.73) and showed good calibration., Conclusions: Three-year survival after dementia diagnosis can be predicted with good accuracy. The survival prediction tables developed in this study may aid clinicians and patients in shared decision-making and advance care planning., (Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)