Search

Purpose: The aim of this study was to map the treatment burden for patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD)., Method: Patients with ongoing treatment with anti-VEGF for wAMD at a Swedish eye unit underwent a survey about the time spent receiving treatment, caregiver assistance, way of transportation, self-rated vision and negative experiences associated with the treatment such as discomfort, anxiety or transportation problems. Information about current visual acuity, number of treatments and current treatment intervals were obtained from medical records., Results: The study included 93 patients with an average age of 79.9 years, 68% were women. The average interval between treatments was 7.3 weeks, and 26% had active treatment in both eyes. On average, patients had to spend 2.7 h (2.4-2.9: 95% CI) per treatment and a caregiver assisted the patient in 58% of cases. Caregivers spent on average 2.6 h (2.5-2.8: 95% CI) per visit, and 19% needed to take time off work. The majority (91%) of patients did not experience any transportation problems associated with treatment. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed a significantly lower odds ratio for discomfort with higher self-rated vision and a significantly higher odds ratio for discomfort with longer treatment intervals., Discussion: Anti-VEGF treatment is an effective treatment for wAMD. However, the relatively short treatment intervals place a considerable burden on patients and their relatives regarding time. Although the patients in this study had to spend a lot of time to receive treatment, the majority did not experience any problems associated with treatment., (© 2023 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation.)

Background: The purpose of the study was to compare the real-world aflibercept treatment and visual outcomes, and to examine the adherence to pandemic guidelines in two groups of patients with treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) before and during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden up to the 1-year follow-up., Methods: This is a retrospective observational study including 2915 treatment naïve eyes with nAMD. Using data from the Swedish Macula Register (SMR), 1597 eyes initiating treatment between 1 July 2018 and 31 January 2019 (pre-pandemic group) were compared with 1318 eyes starting treatment between 1 February and 31 August 2020 (pandemic group). The eyes were then followed for 1 year ± 2 months, hence the first group was unaffected by the pandemic while the second group was affected. The focus was on baseline characteristics, visual acuity (VA) change from baseline, number of injections, treatment regimen, number of appointments and the frequency and length of appointment delays. The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test was used to compare baseline VA to follow-up VA within the respective groups. The Mann-Whitney U-test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare outcomes between the groups., Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. The percentage of eyes with an available follow-up VA after 1 year was 58% in the pre-pandemic group vs. 44% in the pandemic group. VA in the pre-pandemic group had increased significantly after 1 year, from 62.2 ± 14.1 letters to 64.8 ± 16.1 letters (n = 921); p < 0.0001. In the pandemic group, VA increased from 61.1 ± 15.8 to 64.9 ± 16.9 (n = 575); p < 0.0001. There was no significant difference in mean VA change between the groups; p = 0.1734. The pre-pandemic group had significantly more delays than the pandemic group, 45% vs. 36%; p < 0.0001., Conclusions: The pre-pandemic and pandemic groups had similar VA gains at 1-year follow-up, but with a reduced number of available VA in the pandemic group. Clinics were able to implement and prioritize injection visits excluding VA measurements, helping to reduce delays and maintain VA gains during the COVID-19 pandemic., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To analyse the development of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in the fellow eye in patients initially presenting with unilateral nAMD, using data from the Swedish Macula Register., Methods: This observational study included data on treatment-naïve patients who initially underwent unilateral treatment for nAMD, and then required bilateral treatment, between 2010 and 2018, according to the Swedish Macula Register (SMR). The data were also stratified according into three time periods (2010-2013; 2014-2016; 2017-2018). Treatment duration, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the first and second eye, number of injections in the first eye before falling ill in the second, and the time between the last injection in the first eye and the start of treatment of the fellow eye were analysed., Results: 5216 out of 28 670 (18%) patients treated for nAMD subsequently required bilateral treatment. The mean age was 77.7 ± 7.3 years, and 69% were female. The mean duration of treatment of the first eye before nAMD was diagnosed in the fellow eye was 1.58 years, and the mean number of injections in the first eye was 8.9 ± 8.6. Best-corrected visual acuity, according to the ETDRS chart, was higher in the second eye at the time when treatment started in that eye compared to treatment start in the first eye: 62.8 (14.7) versus 57.6 (15.5); p < 0.001, and was higher in the 66% whose first eye was still undergoing treatment: 63.6 ± 14.5 versus 61.0 ± 14.8; p = 0.001., Conclusions: The mean duration of treatment of the first eye before treatment started in the fellow eye was 19 months, and treatment of the second eye had started within 2 years in 61% of the patients. Best-corrected visual acuity was higher in the second eye than in the first eye at the start of treatment of that eye and was higher in the second eye at the start of treatment of that eye when the first eye was still being treated., (© 2022 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation.)

Purpose: To analyse and compare the number and interval of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), as well as the visual development in patients followed up for one to three years in clinical practice and during different index periods., Methods: This observational study included treatment-naïve eyes with nAMD from the Swedish Macula Register that started treatment between 2007 and 2017, stratified by different index periods (2007-2010, 2011-2013, 2014-2015 and 2016-2017) and by follow-up cohorts for each index period of one, two or three years (cohorts 1-3). Their intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment was assessed by number of injections, injection intervals, visual acuity (VA) and near VA change., Results: From the earliest index period 2007-2010 to the latest 2016-2017, the number of injections increased for the comparable follow-up time; 6.2 ± 1.4 versus 8.3 ± 2.0 injections after 1 year of treatment, 4.8 ± 1.6 versus 6.7 ± 2.4 during year 2. The last injection interval was 73 ± 34 days after 1, 71 ± 33 after 2 and 67 ± 32 after 3 years of follow-up for the index period 2014-2015. For the same period, the percentage of eyes with at least two consecutive 12-16 weeks of injection interval over 1-, 2- and 3-year follow-up increased from 5.2%, 15.0%, to 17.5% respectively. Baseline VA for eyes indexed 2016-2017 increased and presented with 62.1 ± 13.4 letters compared with 57.7 ± 13.5 letters in 2007-2010; p < 0.0001., Conclusions: From the earliest to the latest index periods, the number of injections increased for the comparable follow-up time. Accordingly, baseline VA and near VA and their outcomes improved continuously., (© 2021 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation.)

Purpose: To examine the clinical effects of switching intravitreal drug treatment from the approved vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, ranibizumab and aflibercept, to off label use of bevacizumab in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration., Methods: This retrospective study scrutinized medical records of patients with wet age-related macular degeneration who switched therapy to bevacizumab due to a policy decision. Best corrected visual acuity, central retinal thickness, and number of injections before and 1 year after the switch was compared. The non-inferiority margin of best corrected visual acuity was five Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters., Results: A switch from ranibizumab was evaluable in 93 eyes and from aflibercept in 19 eyes. Neither of the groups had a significant non-inferior visual acuity 16 month after the switch. Mean best corrected visual acuity in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters was 63.8 (95% confidence interval: 61.3-66.4) before and 62.2 (95% confidence interval: 59.3-65.1) after in the ranibizumab group and 68.2 (95% confidence interval: 63.3-73.1) before and 67.7 (95% confidence interval: 62.8-72.6) after in the aflibercept group. Mean central retinal thickness in micrometers decreased from 254 (95% confidence interval: 247-261) to 250 (95% confidence interval: 225-275) in the ranibizumab group and from 265 (95% confidence interval: 255-276) to 262 (95% confidence interval: 251-273) in the aflibercept group. The treatment was changed again after the switch in 18% of the patients in the ranibizumab group and 19% in the aflibercept group and these subjects were excluded from the analyses., Conclusion: In patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration, a switch from ranibizumab or aflibercept to bevacizumab seems possible without a significant decrease in visual acuity in most patients.

Purpose: To assess mean change in visual acuity (VA) overall and stratified by baseline VA after 1 and 2 years' treatment with aflibercept in a real-life setting., Methods: This was an observational cohort study using nationwide data from the Swedish Macula Register. Treatment-naïve patient eyes with wet age-related macular degeneration and prescribed aflibercept from January 2013 to December 2014 were followed for 1 year (2478 eyes) or 2 years (831 eyes) to assess VA. Eyes were grouped by baseline VA., Results: Mean number of injections in patients treated according to label (72%) versus patients treated not according to label was 8.0 ± 1.5 versus 4.4 ± 0.8 (p < 0.0001) at 1 year, and 12.5 ± 3.2 versus 7.3 ± 1.9 (p < 0.0001) at 2 years. Among all eyes, mean VA increased from 61.3 ± 13.4 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters at baseline to 64.5 ± 15.6 at 1 year and 65.1 ± 15.1 letters at 2 years. At 2 years, eyes with good baseline vision (≥70 letters) lost a mean of 2.4 ± 11.3 to 72.3 letters, eyes with intermediate baseline VA (36-69 letters) gained 5.7 ± 14.1 to 62.7 letters, and eyes with poor baseline VA (≤35 letters) gained 13.2 ± 18.3 to 41.0 letters. Also at 2 years, 75% of treated eyes were stable or had improved VA. Among eyes with intermediate baseline VA, near vision was significantly better among those treated according to label versus not according to label at 3 (p = 0.019), 6 (p = 0.0002) and 12 months (p ≤ 0.0001)., Conclusion: While gain in vision was especially pronounced in eyes with poor baseline VA, good baseline VA was important for best prognosis., (© 2018 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: To investigate risk factors for treatment discontinuation for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD)., Methods: Data from the Swedish Macula Register and the Skåne Healthcare Register are reported on the treatment received by 932 nAMD patients diagnosed 2013-2015. Treatment discontinuation is defined as having a termination visit or lacking a control or treatment visit during the period of 10-14 months after the diagnostic visit. The risk of treatment discontinuation during the first year is estimated using a Poisson model and a classification tree., Results: 503 eyes (50.9%) discontinued the treatment within the first year. Patients with visual acuity below 60 ETDRS letters (20/60 Snellen) at baseline, serious comorbidities, or treated at the university hospital have a 42% (95% CI 25-61%, P < 0.001), 27% (95% CI 13-43%, P = 0.001) and 30% (95% CI 15-46%, P < 0.001) increased risk to discontinue treatment compared with similar patients. Patients on ranibizumab therapy have a 45% (95% CI 28-63%, P < 0.001) increased risk for treatment discontinuation during year 1 compared with patients on aflibercept therapy. The classification tree also shows that patients on ranibizumab therapy and those with low VA at baseline are at a higher risk of terminating treatment., Conclusions: Almost half of the patients starting anti-VEGF therapy discontinue treatment during the first year. Patients with risk factors may require additional support to continue with the treatment. Aflibercept therapy could be an alternative to patients at risk of treatment discontinuation.