1. Clinical use of cangrelor: nationwide experience from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR).
- Author
-
Grimfjärd P, Lagerqvist B, Erlinge D, Varenhorst C, and James S
- Subjects
- Adenosine Monophosphate adverse effects, Adenosine Monophosphate therapeutic use, Aged, Coronary Thrombosis diagnosis, Coronary Thrombosis mortality, Coronary Thrombosis prevention & control, Drug Utilization trends, Female, Hemorrhage chemically induced, Humans, Male, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention adverse effects, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention mortality, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors adverse effects, Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists adverse effects, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction diagnosis, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction mortality, Sweden epidemiology, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Adenosine Monophosphate analogs & derivatives, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention trends, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors therapeutic use, Practice Patterns, Physicians' trends, Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists therapeutic use, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction therapy
- Abstract
Aims: This nationwide study aimed to analyse the first 2 years of routine clinical use of cangrelor in all Swedish patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Methods and Results: This observational Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR) study identified 915 cangrelor-treated patients. As 899 were ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)-patients undergoing primary PCI, we decided to exclude all non-STEMI patients (n = 16) from the following analysis. We then identified all primary PCI patients, January 2016 to January 2018 (n = 10 816). Excluding hospitals without cangrelor use, tailoring time frames from first cangrelor use per hospital, patients treated with cangrelor (n = 899) were compared with those without cangrelor treatment (n = 4614). A separate analysis was performed for cardiac arrest STEMI patients (n = 273). Cangrelor-use in primary PCI varied greatly between hospitals (4-36%, mean 16%). At variance with randomized trials, cangrelor was used nearly exclusively in STEMI, often with cardiac arrest (19%). Cangrelor was combined with ticagrelor in two-thirds of patients, among which >50% was prehospital. Cangrelor was used more frequently in high-risk patients: left main PCI, thrombus aspiration, and cardiac arrest. Despite cangrelor being used in more high-risk patients, crude definite stent thrombosis rates at 30 days were low and similar in cangrelor (0.7%) and non-cangrelor treated patients (0.8%)., Conclusion: Cangrelor was used nearly exclusively in primary PCI STEMI patients, predominantly with ticagrelor. Despite being used in very high-risk patients, often with cardiac arrest, cangrelor treatment was associated with low stent thrombosis rates., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF