Search

Background: Endothelial dysfunction plays a major role in cardiovascular diseases, including acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, its quantification has not been available as a clinical tool., Methods: In a prospective international multicentre study, we analyzed the diagnostic and prognostic utility of endothelial dysfunction as quantified by C-terminal proendothelin-1 (CT-proET-1) in 658 consecutive patients presenting with suspected AMI. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists. Patients were followed long-term for mortality., Results: The adjudicated final diagnosis was AMI in 145 patients (22%). The diagnostic performance of CT-proET-1 for AMI was moderate; its area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve amounted to 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.72; P < 0.001). There was no significant increase in the AUC when CT-proET-1 was added to either cardiac troponin T (cTnT) or high-sensitivity cTnT (hs-cTnT). Seventy four percent of patients who died during the first 24 months (n = 50) were in the fourth quartile of the CT-proET-1 presentation value (>82 pmol/L). The prognostic accuracy of CT-proET-1 regarding mortality was tantamount to that of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and outperformed cTnT and hs-cTnT both in patients with AMI and in patients without acute coronary syndrome. CT-proET-1 at presentation yielded high prognostic accuracy that was similar to that of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) and Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk scores. The TIMI risk score could be significantly improved by adding CT-proET-1 (integrated discriminatory improvement [IDI] of 0.074 P = 0.004)., Conclusions: Use of CT-proET-1 improves risk stratification of unselected patients with suspected AMI. CT-proET-1 did not provide additional diagnostic value., (Copyright © 2014 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Concerns have been raised about possible gender disparities in cardiac investigations and/or outcome. This study sought to examine and compare the diagnostic and prognostic performance of selected cardiac biomarkers in women versus men., Methods: In a prospective, multicenter cohort of patients with acute chest pain cardiac troponin T (cTnT) (fourth-generation Roche assay), high-sensitivity cTnT (hs-cTnT), and copeptin were measured at presentation., Results: Of 1,247 patients, 420 were women and 827 were men. Although the rate of acute myocardial infarction was similar in women (14.5%) and men (16.6%, P = .351), women more frequently had cardiac but noncoronary causes of chest pain (17.4% vs 10.8%, P = .001) and less frequently had unstable angina (8.8% vs 16.6%, P = .002) than men. Diagnostic accuracy as quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for acute myocardial infarction in women was 0.90 (95% CI 0.84-0.95) for cTnT, which was lower than the AUC for hs-cTnT alone (0.94, 95% CI [0.91-0.98]), the combination of cTnT with copeptin (0.96, 95% CI [0.94-0.98]) or the combination of hs-cTnT with copeptin (0.96, 95% CI [0.93-0.98]) (P = .008, P = .006, and P = .002, respectively). Prognostic accuracy as quantified by the AUCs for 1-year mortality was 0.69 (0.56-0.83), 0.86 (0.79-0.93), 0.87 (0.81-0.94), and 0.87 (0.80-0.94), respectively. No relevant gender differences in AUCs were observed., Conclusion: The diagnostic and prognostic performance of cTnT, hs-cTnT, and copeptin is as good in women as in men. High-sensitivity cTnT and the combination of cTnT and copeptin outperform cTnT alone, both in women and men., (Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)