Search

Purpose: Homeostasis Model Assessment-estimated Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) is an important indicator of insulin resistance. In this population-based investigation, we sought to report the mean value of HOMA-IR in different subgroups of a large population-based database of Iranian healthy subjects. Methods: This study recruited adult healthy individuals between the ages of 18 to 70 years old to Massoud Medical Laboratory, Tehran, Iran. Fasting insulin was measured by using the Electro Chemiluminescence method using Roche Cobas 6000 e601/602 instrument. Results: The mean ± SD value of the HOMA-IR index in the studied population was 2.11 ± 0.99 (2.5-97.5% percentiles: 0.66–4.50). In addition, the mean ± SD of HOMA-IR index in male and female groups were 2.35 1.0 (2.5-97.5 percentile: 0.57–4.37) and 2.05 ± 1.0 (2.5-97.5 percentiles: 0.53–4.35), respectively. Interestingly, it was observed a significant increment for the HOMA-IR index in the male group compared with the female group in all age subgroups (P < 0.01). Conclusions: Our findings showed the mean value of 2.11 ± 0.99 HOMA-IR in the Iranian healthy population. Considering the large sample size in our study, more clinical investigations in terms of ethnicity should be done to provide a precise standardized HOMA-IR index in the Iranian population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Insulin resistance is the most common metabolic change associated with obesity. The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between insulin resistance and body composition especially adipose tissue in a randomized Tehrani population. This study used data of 2,160 individuals registered in a cross-sectional study on were randomly selected from among subjects who were referred to nutrition counseling clinic in Tehran, from April 2016 to September 2017. Insulin resistance was calculated by homeostasis model assessment formula. The odds ratio (95% CI) was calculated using logistic regression models. The mean age of the men was 39 (±10) and women were 41 (±11) (the age ranged from 20 to 50 years). The risk of increased HOMA-IR was 1.03 (95% CI: 1.01–1.04) for an increase in one percent of Body fat, and 1.03 (95% CI: 1.00–1.05) for an increase in one percent of Trunk fat. Moreover, the odds ratio of FBS for an increase in one unit of Body fat percent and Trunk fat percent increased by 1.05 (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI: 1.03, 1.06]) and 1.05 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.08). Also, the risk of increased Fasting Insulin was 1.05 (95% CI: 1.03–1.07) for an increase in one unit of Body fat percent, and 1.05 (95% CI: 1.02–1.08) for an increase in one unit of Trunk fat percent. The findings of the present study showed that there was a significant relationship between HOMA-IR, Fasting blood sugar, Fasting Insulin, and 2 h Insulin with percent of Body fat, percent of Trunk fat. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To determine cut-off points of homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), β-cell function (HOMA-B), insulin sensitivity (HOMA-S), and fasting insulin for identifying the subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Iranian adults using data from a prospective population-based study. Methods: From participants of Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study, 4942 Iranian subjects, aged 20-86 years, were followed for incident T2DM. Fasting serum insulin was determined by the electrochemiluminescence immunoasaay. The associations between HOMA-IR, HOMA-B, HOMA-S, and fasting insulin and incident T2DM were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models. The receiver operator characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the cut-off points of HOMA-IR, HOMA-B, HOMA-S, and fasting insulin. Results: After 9.2 year follow-up, 346 (7.0 %) incident cases of T2DM were identified; the risk-factor-adjusted hazard ratios for HOMA1-IR, HOMA2-IR, HOMA1-B, HOMA2-B, HOMA1-S, HOMA2-S, and insulin were 1.15, 1.70, 0.732, 0.997, 0.974, 0.986, and 1.01 in women and 1.37, 1.67, 0.588, 0.993, 0.986, 0.991, and 1.06 in men, respectively (all p < 0.05 except for HOMA2-B in women). Optimal cut-off points for HOMA1-IR, HOMA2-IR, HOMA1-B, HOMA2-B, HOMA1-S, HOMA2-S, and insulin were 1.85, 1.41, 86.2, 72.5, 54.1, 63.7, and 11.13 µU/ml in women and 2.17, 1.18, 67.1, 74.6, 46.1, 74.1, and 9.16 µU/ml in men, respectively. Conclusions: HOMA-IR, HOMA-B (except for HOMA2-B in women), HOMA-S, and fasting insulin were independent predictors of T2DM. Optimal cut-off points of HOMA-IR, HOMA-B, HOMA-S, and fasting serum insulin were determined from a population-based study for identifying incident T2DM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: We assessed the threshold of homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) values to determine insulin resistance (IR) in a sample of Iranians and examined the associations of IR with metabolic syndrome (MetS). Study comprised 1327 non-diabetic and non-hypertensive subjects (438 men, 838 women; aged 20–77 years) incurred in four different locations (Tehran, Iran), 2005–2008.Lower limit of the top quintile of HOMA values in subjects without any metabolic abnormality was considered as the threshold of IR. This threshold was 1.8 (1.7 men; 1.8 women). Overall, 41.1% (36.3% men; 41.5% women) of subjects had IR. HOMA cut-off to determine MetS was 1.95 for ATPIII definition, and 1.85 for IDF. IR associated MetS (ATPIII: odds ratio (OR)=2.9, 95% CI=2.2–3.9, p <0.05; IDF: OR=2.94, 95% CI: 2.3–3.8, p <0.05). Sensitivity of MetS to detect IR was 22.4% for IDF and 36.2% for ATPIII criteria. In multivariate models, HOMA was predicted by waist circumference, and inversely by age and serum HDL-cholesterol. In this study, the cut point of HOMA to detect IR was lower than other populations. IR is an unyielding correlate of MetS; but definitions of MetS are insensitive measures of IR in our population. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]