Search

Objectives: To determine the effect of formal medication therapy management (MTM) services on pharmacist workload, as well as to describe the population receiving MTM, describe the services provided, and determine the reimbursement rate for billed MTM services., Data Sources: MTM Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code claims, electronic medical records, and pharmacist MTM logs., Data Synthesis: A retrospective review of all MTM charges from January 1, 2010, to March 31, 2010, was performed. Data collected included location of the MTM visit, age, gender, insurance, primary malignancy, comorbidities, home medications, time to complete and document the MTM visit, and rate of reimbursement., Results: In the 3-month period, 239 MTM visits were completed. It took pharmacists a median of 20 minutes (range 15-127) of face-to-face time and 18 minutes (5-90) for documentation per visit. To date, no claims for MTM have been rejected, and reimbursement rates range from 47% to 79% depending on the insurance provider., Conclusions: MTM in the ambulatory clinic is feasible despite the increase in pharmacist workload from documenting and billing. The increased visibility of clinical pharmacy services justifies the extra time required for formal MTM.

Purpose: To describe and assess the current utilization of complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) in women with a diagnosis of either gynecologic or breast cancer and evaluate their reasons for use., Patients and Methods: This study included 250 female patients from the Multidisciplinary Breast Center and 250 patients from the Gynecologic Oncology Center of The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX). Patients were selected by having an odd-numbered medical record number, and they were contacted before their clinic visit. The goals of the study were explained, and verbal consent was obtained. Patients who agreed to participate were asked to bring a written list and the medication bottles of all over-the-counter prescriptions and CAMs with them to clinic. In clinic, the investigator obtained a written informed consent and administered the survey. All patients and surveys were assessable., Results: The most frequently used herbal products and megavitamins/minerals were identified from the patient medication histories. Overall, we found the proportion of patients using CAM to be 48% (95% CI, 44% to 53%; 241 of 500 patients). CAM use was related to patients' educational status: 62% had postgraduate degrees, 50% had college degrees, 56% had some college, and 33% had a high school education or less. Also, among patients using CAMs, only 53.5% had spoken to a healthcare provider regarding CAM therapy., Conclusion: The use of CAM is common among women with cancer. Studies need to be conducted to establish if there are any potential drug interactions and/or therapeutic benefit of CAM products. Moreover, there is a need to educate patients and healthcare providers on appropriate and safe use of CAM products.