Search

Nitrogen Dioxide (NO(2)) is a common urban air pollutant that results from the combustion of fossil fuels. It causes serious human health effects, is a precursor to the formation of ground level ozone, another serious air pollutant, and is one of the six criteria air pollutants established by the United States (U.S.) Clean Air Act (CAA). Ogawa Passive Sampling Devices (PSDs) for NO(2) were collocated and operated at six NO(2) Federal Reference Method (FRM) monitor locations in the El Paso, Texas area for the 2004 calendar year. Passive samples were taken at 2-week, 3-week, and 4-week intervals and compared against the continuously operating FRM monitors. Results showed that the collective NO(2) annual arithmetic mean for all passive monitors was identical to the NO(2) mean for all FRM monitors. Of the individual locations, three passive annual NO(2) means were identical to their corresponding FRM means, and three passive annual NO(2) means differed from their corresponding FRM means by only one part per billion (ppb). Linear correlation analysis between all readings of the individual NO(2) PSDs and FRM values showed an average absolute difference of 1.2 ppb with an r (2) of 0.95. Paired comparison between high and low concentration annual NO(2) sites, seasonal considerations, and interlab quality control comparisons all showed excellent results. The ease of deployment, reliability, and the cost-savings that can be realized with NO(2) PSDs could make them an attractive alternative to FRM monitors for screening purposes, and even possibly an equivalent method for annual NO(2) monitoring. More tests of the Ogawa NO(2) PSD are recommended for different ecosystem and climate regimes.

Passive Sampling Devices (PSDs) have been successfully used by government and academic agencies to monitor common ambient air pollutants such as ozone and nitrogen dioxide (NO(2)). Most PSD studies have involved long-term (e.g. bi-weekly or monthly) sampling. But the Passive Ozone Network of Dallas (POND) studies of 1998 and 1999 showed that high quality 24-hour and 12-hour data using the Ogawa PSD could be collected for ambient ozone concentrations. This paper presents an evaluation of short-term passive sampling results for nitrogen oxides (NO(x)) in El Paso and Houston, Texas, using the Ogawa PSD. The Ogawa NO(x) PSDs were compared to both Federal Reference Method (FRM) monitors and a photolytic converter, with the photolytic converter designed to report closer concentrations to "true" NO(x) by more effectively limiting the interferences of other nitrogen species. Overall, good agreement was noted for all three monitor types in both cities, supporting the potential use of lower cost Ogawa PSDs for large multi-site episodic NO(x)/NO(2)/NO saturation screening studies. This evaluation was conducted during two separate six week periods of the cooler winter months so additional testing of the Ogawa PSDs during different seasons is recommended.