1. Reproductive parameters following a PRRS outbreak where a whole-herd PRRS MLV vaccination strategy was instituted post-outbreak.
- Author
-
Olanratmanee EO, Nuntawan Na Ayudhya S, Thanawongnuwech R, Kunavongkrit A, and Tummaruk P
- Subjects
- Abortion, Veterinary immunology, Abortion, Veterinary prevention & control, Abortion, Veterinary virology, Animals, Antibodies, Viral blood, Disease Outbreaks prevention & control, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay veterinary, Female, Fetal Death immunology, Fetal Death prevention & control, Fetal Death veterinary, Fetal Death virology, Litter Size, Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome immunology, Pregnancy, Reproduction, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction veterinary, Stillbirth veterinary, Swine, Thailand, Time Factors, Vaccines, Attenuated administration & dosage, Vaccines, Attenuated immunology, Viral Vaccines administration & dosage, Viremia immunology, Viremia prevention & control, Viremia virology, Disease Outbreaks veterinary, Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome prevention & control, Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome virology, Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus physiology, Viral Vaccines immunology, Viremia veterinary
- Abstract
This study assessed the effect of whole-herd porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) modified-live virus (MLV) vaccination on herd-level reproductive performance, PRRS virus (PRRSV) viremia, and antibody in a subset of females in a 1,200-sow commercial herd in Thailand. Following a PRRSV outbreak, the entire herd was vaccinated with PRRS MLV twice at 3-week intervals and at 3-month intervals, thereafter. Reproductive performance data over a 3-year period were available for analysis. Serum samples were collected before and after vaccination and tested by PRRSV ELISA and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Vaccination was statistically associated with a lower abortion rate (1.4 vs. 1.6 %), farrowing rate (83.8 vs. 90.0 %), total born (10.6 vs. 11.4 piglets/litter), liveborn (10.0 vs. 10.3 piglets/litter), stillbirths (4.6 vs. 7.0 %), mummies (0.7 vs. 1.6 %), and a higher return rate (11.3 vs. 5.9 %) when compared with the period before the PRRSV outbreak. Pregnant females vaccinated during early gestation farrowed fewer liveborn and more mummies than the comparison group, whereas females vaccinated during late gestation had a lower farrowing rate. In this herd, PRRS whole-herd vaccination had neutral, positive, and negative effects on reproductive performance. Thus, the decision to implement whole-herd vaccination should be balanced between the benefits derived from reproductive performance improvements, e.g., fewer abortions, stillborn piglets, and mummified fetuses, and the effect of vaccination on pregnant females.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF