Search

Introduction: Aneuploids, copy number variations (CNVs), and single nucleotide variants in specific genes are the main genetic causes of developmental delay (DD) and intellectual disability disorder (IDD). These genetic changes can be detected using chromosome analysis, chromosomal microarray (CMA), and next-generation DNA sequencing techniques. Therefore; In this study, we aimed to investigate the importance of CMA in determining the genomic etiology of unexplained DD and IDD in 123 patients. Method: For 123 patients, chromosome analysis, DNA fragment analysis and microarray were performed. Conventional G-band karyotype analysis from peripheral blood was performed as part of the initial screening tests. FMR1 gene CGG repeat number and methylation analysis were carried out to exclude fragile X syndrome. Results: CMA analysis was performed in 123 unexplained IDD/DD patients with normal karyotypes and fragile X screening, which were evaluated by conventional cytogenetics. Forty-four CNVs were detected in 39 (39/123=31.7%) patients. Twelve CNV variant of unknown significance (VUS) (9.75%) patients and 7 CNV benign (5.69%) patients were reported. In 6 patients, one or more pathogenic CNVs were determined. Therefore, the diagnostic efficiency of CMA was found to be 31.7% (39/123). Conclusion: Today, genetic analysis is still not part of the routine in the evaluation of IDD patients who present to psychiatry clinics. A genetic diagnosis from CMA can eliminate genetic question marks and thus alter the clinical management of patients. Approximately one-third of the positive CMA findings are clinically intervenable. However, the emergence of CNVs as important risk factors for multiple disorders increases the need for individuals with comorbid neurodevelopmental conditions to be the priority where the CMA test is recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The development of whole-genome screening methodologies for the detection of copy number variations (CNVs), such as array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCHG), provides a much higher resolution than karyotyping leading to the identification of novel microdeletion and microduplication syndromes often associated with an autism spectrum disease (ASD) phenotype. The aim of the study was to determine CNVs of patients with ASD by using array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Methods: Fifty-three patients diagnosed with ASD between 20.01.2014 and 14.01.2015 were included in the study. Chromosome analysis of the patients was performed from peripheral blood cultures and analysed as normal. All patients were evaluated with P064C1 and P096A2 MLPA probes in terms of 16 mental retardation related syndromes. For aCGH method, SurePrint G3 Human microarrays 8x60K were used with genomic DNA isolated from peripheral blood. Results: According to results of 53 patients who were included in and performed with arrayCGH, 8 (15%) patients had CNVs classified as pathogenic or variant of unknown significance (VOUS) in the study. We detected a pathogenic NRXN1 gene partial CNV deletion (2p16.3) in two patients. Also we identified a 900 kb duplication of 4p15.31 including SLIT2 gene, and a 245 kb duplication of 15q11.2 including PWRN1 gene in one patient. Our other findings are considered to be a variant of unknown significance (VOUS). Conclusion: The results of the study support the literature knowledge, where the copy number variations that cannot be detected with conventional cytogenetics methods in terms of size may happen in patients with ASD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]