Search

Background/aim: PSORTAKSIS is a psoriasis registry, which is used for follow-up of patients in Kayseri City Education and Research Hospital, Dermatology Clinic since 2016 in Turkey. PSORTAKSIS includes demographic data, follow-up clinical findings, laboratory output, and treatment information of patients. Here, drug survivals of biologic therapeutics (BT) according to three-year data of PSORTAKSIS will be presented. Materials and methods: Drug survival of BT in PSORTAKSIS was analyzed from 2016 to March 2019. Results: 158 patients (111 of them BT-naive) with psoriasis under BT were enrolled in the current study. Drug survival analysis of patients with ongoing BT (158 treatment periods) revealed mean survival time as 15.49 months for ustekinumab, 15.37 months for adalimumab, 14.00 months for etanercept, 5 months for infliximab, and 4.59 months for secukinumab. The differences between drug survivals of BT were statistically significant (log-rank test, χ2 = 79.915, p < 0.0001). Age of onset was found to be the only independent risk factor of drug survival according to regression analysis (p = 0.029). Conclusion: As a conclusion, drug survival of UST was significantly higher than that of TNF-alpha inhibitors and SEC in the treatment of psoriasis. This study revealed that among predictors, age at disease onset may influence drug survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Psoriasis is a chronic, immune‐mediated disease deriving from a polygenic predisposition. Treatment paradigm of the moderate to severe psoriasis has changed in the last two decades as biologics have been developed. Real‐world data concerning biologics in the treatment vary from country to country. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and drug survival of biologic agents in patients treated in our clinic in Turkey. Data for 211 biologic protocols were examined for 125 patients treated with a biologic at least once for a minimum duration of 16 weeks at our department. The drug survival rate for 3 years was highest among ustekinumab (UST) users. The primary failure rate in the present study was higher among tumor necrosis factor‐alpha inhibitors compared to UST (P <.0001). The higher primary failure rate was found in etanercept users and the highest secondary failure rate was observed in infliximab, while the lowest primary and secondary failure rates were determined in UST users. UST use and articular involvement emerged as significant positive predictors of drug survival in naïve patients. Our study is the first study presenting real‐life data and biologic survival in the treatment of psoriasis in Turkey, and UST exhibited significantly higher drug survival scores, particularly in naive patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/aim: Adipose tissue produces several inflammatory mediators. Thus, obesity affects the disease course and the responses to the antirheumatic agents in inflammatory diseases. The aim of the study was to determine whether the body mass index (BMI) is involved in the response to rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Materials and Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 206 RA patients who received rituximab from the Turkish Biologic (TURKBIO) registry between 2011 and the end of May 2017. Demographic and clinical data including age, sex, disease type, disease duration, and previous or current treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biological drug durations are stored in the database. Patients with a BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 were classified as obese, and patients with a BMI <30 kg/m 2 were classified as nonobese. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to estimate the drug survival. The subgroups were compared using the log-rank test., Results: The mean BMI of 206 patients included in the study was 27.05 (17.2-43.4) kg/m 2 . There were 59 (28.6%) patients in the obese group and 147 (71.4%) patients in the nonobese group. The mean age, female percentage, and baseline disease activity score 28 (DAS28) were higher in the obese group than in the nonobese group. However, the ΔDAS28 at both 6 and 12 months were not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.785 and p = 0.512, respectively). Patient pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), patient fatigue VAS, and patient global VAS scores were also significantly higher at baseline in the obese group (p = 0.003, p = 0.006, and p = 0.006, respectively). However, no significant difference was found in terms of changes in patient pain VAS, patient fatigue VAS, patient global VAS and physician global VAS scores at 6 and 12 months compared to those at baseline. Rituximab treatment was ongoing for 71.2% of the obese and 63.3% of the nonobese patients (p = 0.279). The median drug survival duration was 77 months in the obese group and 62 months in the nonobese group (p = 0.053). The estimated drug survival rates for rituximab were not statistically significantly different in the obese and nonobese groups. Rituximab-related side effects were also similar between the groups., Conclusion: In obese and nonobese patients with RA, rituximab treatment exhibits similar side effects and similar long-term efficacy. These results suggest that obesity does not alter drug survival for rituximab and response rates, in RA and rituximab may be a favorable treatment agent in patients with RA and obesity., (© TÜBİTAK.)