Search

Background: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a viral infection that can result in life-threatening conditions, such as hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis. Tenofovir, which is used for the treatment of CHB, is a nucleotide analog that inhibits HBV-DNApolymerase and has two formulations: disoproxil and alafenamide. In contrast to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) penetrates the whole hepatocyte without being eliminated due to its longer plasma half-life and greater plasma stability. As a result, side effects such as proximal renal tubulopathy and loss of bone density are less common in the treatment of TAF and have similar efficacy to TDF. Objectives: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of TAF using real-life data. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was carried out in secondary or tertiary healthcare centers in southern Turkey. A total of 480 patients aged 18 years and older were administered TAF for an appropriate indication by the infectious diseases and gastroenterology clinics of the healthcare centers participating in this study. The data collected at t = 0, t = 3, and t = 6 months of treatment were analyzed. The chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, Friedman, Wilcoxon, Cochran's Q, and McNemar's tests were used. Results: The mean age of the patients was 47.40 ± 14.5, and 327 of them (68.1%) were male. A total of 78.l% of the 480 patients who underwent the TAF treatment had previous antiviral therapy experience (TDF, n = 340; 70.8 %), and 2l.9% were treatment-naive. The most common reasons for the initiation of TAF treatment were the use of drugs affecting bone mineral density (BMD) (42.9%) and osteoporosis (22.3%). Patients who had taken TDF experienced a significant improvement in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), hip and spine T-scores, and phosphorus levels from t = 0 months to t = 6 months after switching to TAF (P < 0.05). For this group, no statistically significant difference was observed concerning LDL and cholesterol levels from t = 0 months to t = 6 months. Side effects were reported by 5.7% of patients in the third month and 7.l% in the sixth month, with the most common side effect being hair loss (l%). Conclusions: TAF was found to be an effective and safe alternative to TDF with lower incidences of its long-term effects, such as nephrotoxicity and decreased bone density. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Gazi Medical Journal is the property of Galenos Yayinevi Tic. LTD. STI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Owing to impaired immune function, surgical procedures, and multiple hospitalizations, patients with end-stage liver disease are at risk for numerous infectious complications while waiting for transplantation. Infection in transplant recipients remains the main cause of mortality and morbidity, despite advances in surgical techniques and the development of new repressive agents. The purpose of this study is to examine the infections that develop during the pretransplantion period in live donor liver transplant recipients and their effect on post-transplant clinical outcomes. The retrospective analysis of adult live donor liver transplant recipients in the last 4 years was conducted at Ankara University Hospital, a 1900-bed tertiary-care university hospital, in Ankara, Turkey. Demographic characteristics, preoperative infections, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether they had developed an infection before transplantation. The diagnoses were based on clinical, laboratory, and microbiological findings. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata version 9.0 (StataCorp, College Station, Tex., United States), and P < .05 were considered statistically significant. In univariate analyses, having diabetes mellitus or a pretransplant infection, the number of pretransplant infection attacks, the need for a reoperation, and developing a post-transplant infection were the statistically significant factors associated with 1-year mortality (P < .001, χ 2 test). In multivariate analyses, diabetes mellitus (Odds ratio [OR] = 7.44, 95% confidence interval [CI], .03-45.79; P = .013), reoperation (OR = .33, 95% CI, .25-2.20; P < .001), having a pretransplantation infection (OR = 12.47, 95% CI, .011-87.67; P = .013), and the number of pretransplantation infection attacks (OR = .028, 95% CI, .013-.47; P < .001) were found to be statistically significant risk factors for 1-year mortality. Our study showed the effect of pretransplantation infections on post-transplant morbidity but not on rejection or mortality. According to the situation of patients, manageable pretransplantation infection is not an absolute contraindication for liver transplantation. Awareness of the increased risk for post-transplant infections and fast-acting antimicrobial coverage are the most important facts for patient survival., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriacea (CPE) cause serious and life-threatening infections. They are resistant to carbapenems and many other classes of commonly used antimicrobial agents; therefore, managing infections caused by them poses a substantial challenge in clinical practice. They can also cause morbidity and mortality in patients with liver transplant. A retrospective analysis of CPE culture-positive patients with a history of liver transplant can help to examine the epidemiology and microbiology of these bacteria, as well as gain information on the possible infection sources, susceptibility patterns, and expected mortality in infected populations. In addition, study of these bacteria could help formulate a consensus on the appropriate use of empirical and directed antibiotic therapy, which can effectively reduce infections in these patients. We reviewed the medical records of 142 subjects who underwent liver transplantation at Ankara University Hospital, a 1900-bed tertiary care university hospital, in Ankara, Turkey, between January 2014 and August 2018. Patients showing signs of infection with culture positivity for CPE-producing organisms were included from the study. Statistical analysis was performed and a value of P < .05 is considered statistically significant. In most cases, the source of infection was the abdomen. Klebsiella species was also predominant in these cases. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores and length of hospital stay were higher and statistically significant when compared to patients who were CPE negative. Mortality was highest in the CPE-positive group. Infection is the most important cause of mortality and morbidity after liver transplantation and increases the cost of treatment. Regarding the culture sensitivity patterns and resistance mode, empirical therapy with carbapenems does not produce a solid result. The high mortality observed with these infections reflects very limited therapeutic options., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)