Search

Background: One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) is becoming popular, but some patients may need to convert to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) due weight-related difficulties or postoperative complications. The data on conversions is currently limited to 30-day or short-term follow-up studies. As such, the objective of this study was to evaluate the indications and mid-term outcomes for OAGB conversions to RYGB at a tertiary referral center in the United Arab Emirates., Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent conversion from OAGB to RYGB between February 2016 and May 2023. Demographic information, indications for conversion, intraoperative details, and mid-term outcomes were collected and analyzed., Results: Sixty-four patients underwent conversion from previous OAGB to RYGB. The cohort was 73.4% female (n = 47) with a mean age of 40.8 years. Indications for conversion included acid reflux (n = 28, 43.7%), intractable nausea/vomiting (n = 20, 31.2%), protein-calorie malnutrition (n = 7, 10.9%), anastomotic ulcer (n = 6, 9.3%) and weight recidivism (n = 3, 4.7%). The mean operative time was 238 ± 78.3 min. During the procedure, three intraoperative complications occurred: two cases of bleeding and one case of bowel perforation; all successfully addressed during surgery. The median hospital stay was 3 ± 15.8 days. Three patients (4.6%) experienced major postoperative complications comprising 2 anastomotic leaks and 1 small bowel obstruction. The mean follow-up time was 26.2 ± 19.7 months, with 96.2% of patients reporting resolution of symptoms. There were no mortalities., Conclusions: Acid reflux is representing 43.7% of the indications for conversion from OAGB to RYGB. The symptom resolution rate holds significance, standing at a remarkable 96.8%. Despite surgical technique advancements, the complication rate after conversions remains significant at 4.6%, with no mortality reported. OAGB patients should be informed about these risks prior to undergoing conversions from OAGB to RYGB., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Diastasis recti (DR) is characterized by an abnormal separation between the rectus abdominis muscles. Traditional repair includes only plication; however, complications may arise in the presence of concurrent ventral hernias (VH). This study aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of diastasis repair in a United Arab Emirates (UAE) population. Methods and Procedures: This retrospective cohort study was conducted with IRB approval. All patients who underwent a DR repair (DRR) with concomitant ventral hernia repair between October 2022 and February 2024 were included. Results: A total of 20 patients were included in the study. The cohort was 80% female, with a mean overall age of 44.05 years. The mean body mass index was 27.4 kg/m 2 . All patients (100%) presented with DR associated with an abdominal wall defect; 17 patients (85%) with umbilical hernia, 2 patients (10%) with umbilical and incisional hernia, and 1 patient (5%) with umbilical with epigastric hernia. A total of 12 (60%) patients underwent laparoscopic DRR concomitant with VH repair, 5 (25%) patients underwent open DRR with VH repair and abdominoplasty, and 1 patient (5%) underwent DRR with VH repair and liposuction. All cases were successful without complications or conversions. Complications within 30 days included only seromas in 6 patients (30%), one requiring drainage. Conclusion: Our initial experience suggests that DR repair with concomitant VH repair and/or abdominoplasty is feasible and safe in the UAE population. Our experience demonstrated surgical outcomes compared to other regions in the world.

Purpose: Data reported on comparing primary and revisional procedures in the elderly is still limited. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety between primary and revisional bariatric surgery in a cohort of older patients., Materials and Methods: All patients ≥ 60 years old were divided into two cohorts, primary surgery cohort (PSC) and revisional surgery cohort (RSC). Baseline and perioperative outcomes were analyzed., Results: Fifty-eight patients were included (34 PSC and 24 RSC) in the study. Forty-two (25 PSC and 17 RSC) 72.4% were female. The mean age was 64 (± 3.3 years) in the PSC and 65 (± 4.2 years) in the RSC, the median initial BMI was 46.7 and 47.4 kg/m 2 (p < 0.848), respectively. The mean hospital stay was (3 PSC vs. 5 RSC, p < 0.022) days. Readmissions occurred in (1 PSC vs. 3 RSC, p = 0.158) patients within 30 days of discharge. Postoperative major complications included (1 PSC vs. 5 RSC, p < 0.0278) patients. Reoperations were reported in (0 PSC vs. 3 RSC, p < 0.034) patients. Patients who underwent surgery for weight management, the initial mean BMI was (46.7 PSC vs. 47.4 RSC kg/m2, p = 0.848). At 12-months post-procedure, the mean BMI was (34.3 PSC vs. 37.7 RSC kg/m2, p = 0.372) and (23.7 PSC vs. 19.1 RSC, p = 0.231) %TBWL. The mean overall follow-up was (12.4 PSC vs. 27.5 RSC, p < 0.004) months, and one unrelated death (cancer) was reported in the RSC., Conclusion: PSC and RSC are effective in the elderly, however postoperative complications occurred more often in the RSC group., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Ramadan is characterized by a month of fasting between dawn and sunset. Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi is located in the United Arab Emirates, where the majority of our patients observe Ramadan. In many practices, bariatric surgery has been delayed until after Ramadan in order to avoid postoperative complications. However, there are no studies that evaluate this theory., Objectives: Our study aimed to evaluate perioperative outcomes between bariatric surgeries performed before/during Ramadan and at times distant to Ramadan., Methods: All patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery at Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi between September 2015 and July 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The Pre-Ramadan (PR) cohort included patients that underwent surgery during the month of Ramadan and up to 3 months before Ramadan. The Non-Ramadan (NR) cohort included patients from the remainder 8 months., Results: Our study included 542 patients: 185 patients in the PR cohort and 357 patients in the NR cohort. Baseline characteristics were similar. There were no statistically significant differences in perioperative outcomes, including emergency department (ED) visits (23.2% PR vs. 24.4% NR, p = .77), readmission rates (2.2% PR vs. 4.5% NR, p = .17), reoperation (1.1% PR vs. 3.6% NR, p = .09), and complications within 30 days (3.8% PR vs. 7.0% NR, p = .13)., Conclusions: There is no difference among patients who undergo surgery before/during Ramadan and at times distant to Ramadan. Based on this data, there does not appear to be an increased risk of performing bariatric surgery prior to or during Ramadan in a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary program.

Background: Many patients considering bariatric surgery will obtain medical information through the Internet. The type and quality of information patients access may vary significantly by geographic region., Methods: Searches were performed using commercial search engines in both the United States of America (USA) and United Arab Emirates (UAE) using search terms "bariatric surgery" and "weight loss surgery." Quality was assessed using the scoring systems previously published by DISCERN (United Kingdom (UK)), the Journal of the American Medical Association Benchmark (JAMA; USA), and Expanded Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP) (UK)., Results: Website types were more evenly distributed in UAE, though physician websites were also the most common (n = 25, 25%). Within the USA, most websites analyzed were from physicians (n = 32, 32%), followed by academic sources (n = 26, 26%). Academic websites were the highest average quality in the USA (p < .00001). The overall mean DISCERN scores for all websites in the UAE group and US group had no statistically significance differences (p = .950). The overall mean JAMA Benchmark for all websites in the UAE group and USA had no statistically significance differences (p = 0.202). There were no major differences between the USA and UAE in Expanded EQIP scores., Conclusions: The overall quality of information regarding bariatric surgery is poor to fair in both the USA and UAE. Additionally, there are differences in the types of sites retrieved by the most commonly used search engines in each region. The lack of high-quality, evidence-based, information regarding bariatric surgery online is a potential target to improve public education.

Background: Complications after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) unfortunately lead a subset of patients to require revisional surgery, including conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)., Objectives: We aimed to describe the indications for conversion and perioperative outcomes in this subset of patients., Setting: Academic hospital, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates., Methods: All patients undergoing conversion from SG to RYGB from September 2015 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent conversion solely for weight recidivism were excluded from analysis., Results: Forty-seven patients underwent conversion to RYGB due to complications from SG. The cohort was 76.5% female with a mean age of 39 years and median body mass index of 34 kg/m 2 . The median time between SG and RYGB was 36 months. Indications warranting conversion included mechanical complications (n = 24, 51.1%), intractable reflux (n = 21, 44.7%), and fistula (n = 2, 4.2%). Preoperative mechanical abnormalities included hiatal hernia (n = 13, 27.7%), helical twist (n = 10, 21.3%), sleeve stenosis/stricture (n = 5, 10.6%), fistula (n = 2, 4.2%), and leak (n = 1, 2.1%). Each conversion was completed with a laparoscopic approach, with a median length of stay of 3 days. Four patients (8.5%) experienced complications within 30 days, including 2 patients (4.2%) with superficial surgical site infection, 1 patient each (2.1%) with gastrointestinal hemorrhage and anastomotic leak. There were no mortalities at a median follow-up of 17 months., Conclusion: In this series, representing the largest reported single-center experience in the Middle East, conversion of SG to RYGB was safe and effective for the treatment of symptoms and mechanical complications after SG., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)