Search

• The study the significant mixture effect between LPA, MPA, and VPA on the risk of dementia. • Taking into account genetic risk, physical activity patterns that are more adherent to MPA and VPA are associated with a reduced risk of dementia. • The findings reveal that the effectiveness of specific types of physical activity in reducing the risk of dementia varies based on the subtype of dementia. MPA is found to be more effective for Alzheimer's disease, while VPA is more powerful for vascular dementia. There is limited information on the mixture effect and weights of light physical activity (LPA), moderate physical activity (MPA), and vigorous physical activity (VPA) on dementia risk. A prospective cohort study was conducted based on the UK Biobank dataset. We included participants aged at least 45 years old without dementia at baseline between 2006-2010. The weighted quantile sum regression was used to explore the mixture effect and weights of three types of physical activity on dementia risk. This study includes 354,123 participants, with a mean baseline age of 58.0-year-old and 52.4 % of female participants. During a median follow-up time of 12.5 years, 5,136 cases of dementia were observed. The mixture effect of LPA, MPA, and VPA on dementia was statistically significant (β: -0.0924, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI): (-0.1402, -0.0446), P < 0.001), with VPA (weight: 0.7922) contributing most to a lower dementia risk, followed by MPA (0.1939). For Alzheimer's disease, MPA contributed the most (0.8555); for vascular dementia, VPA contributed the most (0.6271). For Alzheimer's disease, MPA was identified as the most influential factor, while VPA stood out as the most impactful for vascular dementia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To evaluate the associations of baseline and long-term trajectories of lifestyle with incident ischaemic heart diseases (IHDs)., Methods and Results: 29 164 participants in the UK Biobank who had at least one follow-up assessment and were free of IHD at the last follow-up assessment were included. We constructed a weighted unhealthy lifestyle score though summing five lifestyle factors [smoking, physical activity, diet, body mass index, and sleep duration]. Lifestyle assessed at baseline (2006-09), the first follow-up assessment (2012-13), and the second follow-up assessment (since 2014) were used to derive the trajectories of each individual. The joint categories were created through cross-classifying the three baseline lifestyle categories (ideal, intermediate, and poor) by the three lifestyle trajectory categories (improve, maintain, and decline). During a median follow-up period of 4.2 years, 868 IHD events were recorded. The hazard ratio (HR) of incident IHD associated with per unit increase in unhealthy lifestyle trajectory was 1.08 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99-1.17]. Subgroup analyses indicated such association was stronger among individuals with hypertension (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.03-1.24), diabetes (HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 0.96-1.58), or hyperlipidaemia (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.97-1.22). Compared with participants consistently adhering to an ideal lifestyle (ideal-maintain), the HRs of incident IHD were 1.30 (1.07-1.58) for intermediate-maintain, 1.52 (1.23-1.88) for poor-maintain, 1.25 (0.93-1.68) for intermedia-improve, 1.48 (1.17-1.88) for poor-improve, 1.46 (1.08-1.99) for intermedia-decline, and 1.77 (1.21-2.59) for poor-decline., Conclusions: A declined lifestyle trajectory increased the risk of incident IHD, irrespective of baseline lifestyle levels. Individuals with hypertension, diabetes, or hyperlipidaemia were more predisposed to the influence of lifestyle change., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None declared., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)