1. Enhancing the detection of postpartum depression from electronic health records using machine learning algorithms.
- Author
-
Amit, G., Girshovitz, I., Akiva, P., Bar, V., Zhang, Y., Hermann, A., Joly, R., Turchioe, M., and Pathak, J.
- Subjects
POSTPARTUM depression ,ELECTRONIC health records ,MACHINE learning ,EDINBURGH Postnatal Depression Scale ,INTERPERSONAL psychotherapy ,MENTAL depression - Abstract
Introduction: Postpartum depression (PPD) is a common condition, affecting 10-15% of mothers. PPD screening using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) has variable reported accuracy. Information from Electronic health records (EHR) may complement EPDS to provide higher detection rate. Objectives: To develop and evaluate a machine learning model for identifying PPD using EHR data. Methods: We analyzed primary care EHR records of 259,096 live births in the UK from 2000 to 2017. PPD was defined as having either a depression diagnosis, antidepressant prescriptions or psychotherapy referrals within 12 months after childbirth. The validation set included 5,823 women with recorded EPDS scores. The remaining population was split to training(70%) and testing(30%) sets. We built a prediction model using EHR information prior and during pregnancy, partially based on variables described in our complementary study (EPA2020 abstract by Zhang et.al.). We evaluated the performance of the EHR-model, compared to EPDS-alone and a combination of EHR+EPDS scores. Results: Table 1 details the main characteristics of the cohort. The strongest contributing variables were antidepressants, diagnosis or symptoms of depression/anxiety, and age. The combined model outperformed EPDS alone (area under the curve(AUC) 0.87 vs. 0.80) and EHR alone (AUC=0.77) (Table 2, Fig.1). Conclusions: EHR-based predictive algorithms can potentially complement and enhance the accuracy of existing PPD screening tools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020