1. Exploring drivers of the usage of anticoagulant rodenticides on UK farms.
- Author
-
Tomlinson, Alexandra J., Rayner, Annie, Bright, Ashleigh, Cowan, David P., Littin, Kate E., and Layton, Ruth
- Subjects
- *
RODENTICIDES , *RAT baits & repellents , *KILL traps , *FARMS , *PEST control - Abstract
Anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs) are considered inhumane, show increasingly limited efficacy due to acquired resistance, and carry environmental consequences associated with non-target species uptake. In a questionnaire study of 499 UK farms that all deployed chemical rodenticide we found a high mean reliance (79%), on second generation ARs with just over half of the respondents using no other rodent control methods. Additional methods where deployed, alone or in combination, included predation (41%), kill-trap deployment (16%) and shooting (1%). Nearly 40% of all respondents deployed rodenticides year-round. There was no evidence to suggest that “tidy-farm” measures, such as clearing food spills and minimising on-farm rodent harbourage sites aimed at minimising rodent-associated problems, were associated with a lower likelihood of year-round deployment; in fact trends in our analyses suggested the opposite. We therefore encourage operators to fully evaluate the true necessity of rodenticide deployment before AR use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF