Search

Importance: Supplementing potassium in an effort to maintain high-normal serum concentrations is a widespread strategy used to prevent atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery (AFACS), but is not evidence-based, carries risks, and is costly., Objective: To determine whether a lower serum potassium concentration trigger for supplementation is noninferior to a high-normal trigger., Design, Setting, and Participants: This open-label, noninferiority, randomized clinical trial was conducted at 23 cardiac surgical centers in the United Kingdom and Germany. Between October 20, 2020, and November 16, 2023, patients with no history of atrial dysrhythmias scheduled for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery were enrolled. The last study patient was discharged from the hospital on December 11, 2023., Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to a strategy of tight or relaxed potassium control (only supplementing if serum potassium concentration fell below 4.5 mEq/L or 3.6 mEq/L, respectively). Patients wore an ambulatory heart rhythm monitor, which was analyzed by a core laboratory masked to treatment assignment., Main Outcomes and Measures: The prespecified primary end point was clinically detected and electrocardiographically confirmed new-onset AFACS in the first 120 hours after CABG surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurred first. All primary outcome events were validated by an event validation committee, which was masked to treatment assignment. Noninferiority of relaxed potassium control was defined as a risk difference for new-onset AFACS with associated upper bound of a 1-sided 97.5% CI of less than 10%. Secondary outcomes included other heart rhythm-related events, clinical outcomes, and cost related to the intervention., Results: A total of 1690 patients (mean age, 65 years; 256 [15%] females) were randomized. The primary end point occurred in 26.2% of patients (n = 219) in the tight group and 27.8% of patients (n = 231) in the relaxed group, which is a risk difference of 1.7% (95% CI, -2.6% to 5.9%). There was no difference between the groups in the incidence of at least 1 AFACS episode detected by any means or by ambulatory heart rhythm monitor alone, non-AFACS dysrhythmias, in-patient mortality, or length of stay. Per-patient cost for purchasing and administering potassium was significantly lower in the relaxed group (mean difference, $111.89 [95% CI, $103.60-$120.19]; P <.001)., Conclusions and Relevance: For AFACS prophylaxis, supplementation only when serum potassium concentration fell below 3.6 mEq/L was noninferior to the current widespread practice of supplementing potassium to maintain a serum potassium concentration greater than or equal to 4.5 mEq/L. The lower threshold of supplementation was not associated with any increase in dysrhythmias or adverse clinical outcomes., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04053816.

Background: The legal framework for fluid management in the palliative care setting varies between continents and even between countries., Objectives: What legal implications must be taken into account in Germany in dealing with "terminal" dehydration?, Materials and Methods: Relevant publications in English and German have been identified. Notably, German recommendations and guidelines were reviewed, whereas national mindsets were contrasted with those of other countries like the United Kingdom and Canada., Results: Our legal considerations are in line with the recommendations of the German Federal Medical Association. Key components are "patient autonomy", "best possible symptom control" and a "steady therapeutic risk-benefit assessment". Dehydration should then continue to be regarded as a "symptom" that must be "controlled" as long as it can be improved by therapeutic means and as long as the patient is not opposed to this approach. However, if dehydration remains therapeutically refractory, it is justified either not to initiate clinically assisted hydration (CAH) or to stop the ongoing therapy. The "shared decision-making model" practiced in Canada is diametrically opposed to this approach, where paternalistic decision-making is possible, provided that patients or relatives appear to be ill-informed and unprepared to decide "correct" according to expert opinion., Conclusions: A "non-refractory" state of dehydration at the end of life must not be left untreated under German law and must not be used as an option to hasten the death process if the development of dehydration does not correspond to the patient's will or if this will cannot be determined.