Search

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores assess symptom burden in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) but data regarding their role in prognostication and risk stratification are limited. We assessed these relationships using the emPHasis-10 HRQoL measure.1745 patients with idiopathic PAH (IPAH), drug-induced PAH (DPAH), heritable PAH (HPAH) (collectively "(I/D/H)PAH"), or connective tissue disease-associated PAH (CTD-PAH), who had completed emPHasis-10 questionnaires at one of six UK referral centres between 2014 and 2017, were identified. Correlations with exercise capacity and World Health Organization (WHO) functional class were assessed, and exploratory risk stratification thresholds were tested.Moderate correlations were seen between emPHasis-10 scores and 6-min walk distance (r=-0.546), incremental shuttle walk distance (r=-0.504) and WHO functional class (r=0.497) (all p<0.0001). Distribution of emPHasis-10 score differed significantly between each WHO functional class (all p<0.0001). On multivariate analysis, emPHasis-10 score, but not WHO functional class, was an independent predictor of mortality. In a risk stratification approach, scores of 0-16, 17-33 and 34-50 identified incident patients with 1-year mortality of 5%, 10% and 23%, respectively. Survival of patients in WHO functional class III could be further stratified using an emPHasis-10 score ≥34 (p<0.01). At follow-up, patients with improved emPHasis-10 scores had improved exercise capacity (p<0.0001) and patients who transitioned between risk groups demonstrated similar survival to patients originally in those risk groups.The emPHasis-10 score is an independent prognostic marker in patients with (I/D/H)PAH or CTD-PAH. It has utility in risk stratification in addition to currently used parameters. Improvement in emPHasis-10 score is associated with improved exercise capacity., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: R.A. Lewis reports non-financial support for meeting attendance from Actelion Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: I. Armstrong has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Bergbaum has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.J. Brewis has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Cannon has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Charalampopoulos reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Actelion Pharmaceuticals, personal fees and non-financial support from Novartis, and grants from Bayer and GSK, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A.C. Church has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.G. Coghlan has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R.J. Davies has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: K. Dimopoulos has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Elliot reports personal fees for advisory board work and lectures from Actelion Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline and Bayer, as well as grants from Pfizer, Actelion Pharmaceuticals and Bayer, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: J.S.R. Gibbs reports personal fees from Acceleron, Arena, Bayer, Complexa, Pfizer and GSK, as well as grants and personal fees from Actelion and United Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: W. Gin-Sing has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Haji has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A.G. Hameed has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L.S. Howard has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.K. Johnson reports grants and personal fees for meeting attendance, lectures and advisory board work from Actelion and MSD, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A. Kempny has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D.G. Kiely reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Actelion, Bayer and GSK, as well as personal fees and non-financial support from MSD, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: F. Lo Giudice has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. McCabe has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A.J. Peacock has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: O. Peleyeju has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Pepke-Zaba has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Polwarth has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Price reports educational grants from Actelion J&J, during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: I. Sabroe reports grants and personal fees for advisory board work from AstraZeneca, as well as grants from GSK, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: B.E. Schreiber has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: K. Sheares reports educational support from Actelion, Bayer and GSK, as well as personal fees for lectures and consultancy from Actelion, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: D. Taboada reports fees for lectures and education and travel grants from Actelion, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, MDS and Pfizer, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A.A.R. Thompson reports grants from the British Heart Foundation (Intermediate Clinical Fellowship FS/18/13/3328), during the conduct of the study, as well as non-financial support for travel to meetings from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: M.R. Toshner has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: I. Wanjiku has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S.J. Wort has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Yorke has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Condliffe reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Actelion Pharmaceuticals and Bayer, as well as grants from GSK, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©ERS 2021.)

While traffic and air pollution exposure is associated with increased mortality in numerous diseases, its association with disease severity and outcomes in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remains unknown.Exposure to particulate matter with a 50% cut-off aerodynamic diameter ≤2.5 μm (PM 2.5 ), nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) and indirect measures of traffic-related air pollution (distance to main road and length of roads within buffer zones surrounding residential addresses) were estimated for 301 patients with idiopathic/heritable PAH recruited in the UK National Cohort Study of Idiopathic and Heritable PAH. Associations with transplant-free survival and pulmonary haemodynamic severity at baseline were assessed, adjusting for confounding variables defined a priori Higher estimated exposure to PM 2.5 was associated with higher risk of death or lung transplant (unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.68 (95% CI 1.11-6.47) per 3 μg·m -3 ; p=0.028). This association remained similar when adjusted for potential confounding variables (HR 4.38 (95% CI 1.44-13.36) per 3 μg·m -3 ; p=0.009). No associations were found between NO 2 exposure or other traffic pollution indicators and transplant-free survival. Conversely, indirect measures of exposure to traffic-related air pollution within the 500-1000 m buffer zones correlated with the European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society risk categories as well as pulmonary haemodynamics at baseline. This association was strongest for pulmonary vascular resistance.In idiopathic/heritable PAH, indirect measures of exposure to traffic-related air pollution were associated with disease severity at baseline, whereas higher PM 2.5 exposure may independently predict shorter transplant-free survival., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: E. Sofianopoulou has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Kaptoge reports grants from UK Medical Research Council and British Heart Foundation, during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: S. Gräf has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Hadinnapola has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C.M. Treacy has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Church has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Coghlan has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.S.R. Gibbs reports grants and personal fees from Actelion, Bayer, GSK and MSD, personal fees from Arena, Bellerophon, Complexa and Pfizer, grants from Amco and United Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: M. Haimel has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L.S. Howard has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Johnson reports grants and personal fees for attendance at meeting and lectures from Actelion, Bayer, GSK and MSD, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: D.G. Kiely reports grants, personal fees and nonfinancial support from Actelion, Bayer and GSK, personal fees and nonfinancial support from MSD, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A. Lawrie reports grants and personal fees from Actelion and GSK, grants from British Heart Foundation and UK Medical Research Council, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: J. Lordan has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R.V. MacKenzie Ross has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.M. Martin has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Moledina has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Newnham reports education support (travel, registration and accommodation) to attend conferences from MSD and GSK, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A.J. Peacock reports grants and personal fees from Actelion and Bayer, personal fees from GSK, grants from Gilead, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: L.C. Price has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C.J. Rhodes has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Suntharalingam has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E.M. Swietlik has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.R. Toshner has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Wharton reports personal fees for advisory board work from Actelion, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: M.R. Wilkins has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S.J. Wort reports grants and personal fees from Actelion and Bayer, personal fees from GSK and MSD, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: J. Pepke-Zaba (or her institution) received research, education grants from Actelion, Merck and Bayer; and has served on advisory boards for Actelion, Merck, Bayer and GSK. Conflict of interest: R. Condliffe reports personal fees for advisory board work from Actelion, Bayer and MSD, during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: P.A. Corris reports grants and personal fees from Actelion and Bayer, personal fees from MSD, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: E. Di Angelantonio reports grants from European Commission Framework 7, European Research Council, British Heart Foundation, UK Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research, during the conduct of the study; grants from NHS Blood and Transplant, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: S. Provencher has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: N.W. Morrell reports personal fees from GSK and Johnson & Johnson/Actelion, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©ERS 2019.)

Background: Secondary erythrocytosis is common in patients with cyanosis secondary to congenital heart disease (CHD) and/or pulmonary hypertension (PH). This compensatory mechanism aims at increasing oxygen delivery to the tissues, but it requires adequate iron stores. Optimal methods of iron supplementation in this setting remain controversial, with fears of excessive erythropoiesis and hyperviscosity symptoms. We describe our experience using intravenous ferrous carboxymaltose., Methods and Results: 142 consecutive cyanotic patients were treated over 5.7 years (201 administrations). Mean age was 51.3 ± 17.6 years and 55 (38.7%) were male. Eisenmenger syndrome (ES) was present in 41 (28.8%), other pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) related to CHD (PAH-CHD) in 27 (19.0%), cyanotic CHD without PAH in 16 (11.3%) and PH without CHD in 58(40.8%). Baseline haemoglobin (Hb) concentration was 14.6 ± 3.0 g/dL and haematocrit 0.45 ± 0.09. A 500 mg dose of intravenous (IV) iron carboxymaltose was given in 163 (81.1%) of administrations and a 1000 mg dose in 37 (18.4%). A significant improvement in average Hb, haematocrit, ferritin and transferrin saturation was observed after a median follow-up of 100.0 [70.0-161.0] days (p ≤ 0.0001 for all). There were no cases of excessive erythropoiesis resulting in new hyperviscosity symptoms and/or requiring venesection. A minor transient rash was observed in 2 patients and one patient experienced an air embolus causing a transient ischemic attack., Conclusions: Intravenous ferrous carboxymaltose appears to be safe in iron deficient patients with cyanosis due to CHD and/or PH, as long as care is taken to avoid air emboli. Further randomised studies are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of intravenous iron in this setting., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with Eisenmenger syndrome (ES) have better survival, despite similar pulmonary vascular pathology, compared with other patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is useful for risk stratification in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension, whereas it has not been evaluated in ES. We studied CMR together with other noninvasive measurements in ES to evaluate its potential role as a noninvasive risk stratification test., Methods and Results: Between 2003 and 2005, 48 patients with ES, all with a post-tricuspid shunt, were enrolled in a prospective, longitudinal, single-center study. All patients underwent a standardized baseline assessment with CMR, blood test, echocardiography, and 6-minute walk test and were followed up for mortality until the end of December 2013. Twelve patients (25%) died during follow-up, mostly from heart failure (50%). Impaired ventricular function (right or left ventricular ejection fraction) was associated with increased risk of mortality (lowest quartile: right ventricular ejection fraction, <40%; hazard ratio, 4.4 [95% confidence interval, 1.4-13.5]; P=0.01 and left ventricular ejection fraction, <50%; hazard ratio, 6.6 [95% confidence interval, 2.1-20.8]; P=0.001). Biventricular impairment (lowest quartile left ventricular ejection fraction, <50% and right ventricular ejection fraction, <40%) conveyed an even higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio, 8.0 [95% confidence interval, 2.5-25.1]; P=0.0004). No other CMR or noninvasive measurement besides resting oxygen saturation (hazard ratio, 0.90 [0.83-0.97]/%; P=0.007) was associated with mortality., Conclusions: Impaired right, left, or biventricular systolic function derived from baseline CMR and resting oxygen saturation are associated with mortality in adult patients with ES. CMR is a useful noninvasive tool, which may be incorporated in the risk stratification assessment of ES during lifelong follow-up., (© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.)