Search

Summary: Following a 2–3‐month period of publicity, anaesthetists were invited to participate in an online survey that was administered by a third party company on behalf of the Association of Anaesthetists and ran between 3 September and 31 October 2018. Anaesthetists working in the UK or Ireland were asked about the presence or absence of welfare/support structures or resources in their workplace in the case of mental illness, addiction and/or suicide. Anaesthetists working anywhere in the world were also asked for their experiences of a colleague's suicide, defined as a colleague's taking his or her own life – whether intentional or not – while practising as an anaesthetist in the UK or Ireland, in the same department and at the same time as the respondent. Respondents were also asked about experiences of other suicides not meeting this definition. A total of 3638 responses were received. Most respondents were unaware of the existence of policies/guidance on mental illness, addiction or suicide, or of welfare leads, within their Trust or department. A total of 1916 cases of suicide meeting the survey's definition were reported by 1397 respondents, although the actual number of discrete cases is unknown because of likely multiple reporting of the same cases. A third of respondents who reported a suicide had experience of more than one case. Most reports were of suicide in the last 10 years, and most reported cases involved anaesthetic drugs. Deficiencies were noted in the support available and in the way the deaths were handled, although examples of good support were also described. A further 1715 respondents reported suicides that did not meet the primary definition. Overall, 92% of respondents reporting suicide experienced it through work, and 41% outside of work (total > 100% as some reported both). Although unable to provide estimates of suicide rates, or numerical associations between the features of the deaths, this survey highlights the considerable emotional and mental burden of suicide on anaesthetists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Keywords: central neuraxial block; complications; history; regional anaesthesia EN central neuraxial block complications history regional anaesthesia 414 416 3 02/08/21 20210301 NES 210301 Epidurals are standard practice nowadays but have not always been so; all innovations require enthusiasts and pioneers. Evolving use of epidural and caudal blocks Dawkins's list of cases in which he used epidural blocks included upper and lower abdominal, perineal, breast, diagnostic and therapeutic, and miscellaneous. [Extracted from the article]

We analysed data from the electronic rota system CLWRota, covering 2,689,962 anaesthetic sessions between 01/01/2014 and 31/12/2015, in 91 UK Trusts, in order to investigate trainees' supervision. There were 8209 trainee attachments analysed, during which 618,695 sessions were undertaken by trainees. The number of supervised sessions per week that trainees worked varied considerably (median (IQR [range]) 2.6 (1.6-3.6 [0-10]) for all grades combined), with senior trainees more likely than junior trainees to be supervised for fewer than the three sessions per week mandated by the Royal College of Anaesthetists. The number of supervised sessions was unrelated to Trusts' size, suggesting that trainees in smaller hospitals receive the same level of supervision as in larger teaching hospitals. Analysis of a dataset of this size should be a good reflection of the delivery of anaesthesia training in the UK. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Haemorrhage remains an important cause of maternal mortality worldwide. Cell salvage carries a theoretical risk of amniotic fluid embolus syndrome and is too expensive for use in many parts of the world. To explore cheaper options, we investigated whether a leucocyte depletion filter alone removes components of pure amniotic fluid. Amniotic fluid was collected from 10 women during elective caesarean section and passed through a LeukoGuard® RS filter. Pre- and post-filtration samples were compared in the laboratory. Lamellar bodies and fetal squames were almost completely removed (filtration efficacy 96.6% and 99.9%, respectively; p < 0.0001 and <0.0004), and hair was completely removed (p = 0.002). Filtration had no effect on concentrations of α-fetoprotein, tissue factor or endothelin-1, or on the presence of meconium or vernix. Additional work is required to evaluate whether cell salvage using filtration alone may be useful in maternal haemorrhage in the developing world. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The author reflects on the issues of retraction and corrections published in the journal "Anaesthesia." He stresses on the subject of ethics in research and its correlation to publication ethics which follow guidelines provided by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in Great Britain so that publication errors could be avoided. The author suggests the use of the iThenticate software CrossCheck scan to determine the authentication and authorship of editorials before publishing.

We analysed 366 claims related to regional anaesthesia and analgesia from the 841 anaesthesia-related claims handled by the National Health Service Litigation Authority between 1995 and 2007. The majority of claims (281/366, 77%) were closed at the time of analysis. The total cost of closed claims was £12 724 017 (34% of the cost of the anaesthesia dataset) with a median (IQR [range]) of £4772 (£0–28 907 [£0–2 070 092]). Approximately half of the claims (186/366; 51%) were related to obstetric anaesthesia and analgesia and of the non-obstetric claims, the majority (148/180; 82%) were related to neuraxial block. The total cost for obstetric closed claims was £5 433 920 (median (IQR [range]) £5678 (£0–27 690 [£0–1 597 565]) while that for non-obstetric closed claims was £7 290 097 (£3337 (£0–31 405 [£0–2 070 062]). Non-obstetric claims were more likely to relate to severe outcomes than obstetric ones. The maximum values of claims were higher for claims related to neuraxial blocks and eye blocks than for peripheral nerve blocks. Despite many limitations, including lack of clinical detail for each case, the dataset provides a useful overview of the extent, patterns and cost associated with the claims. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We contacted the duty obstetric anaesthetist in 219 of the 220 consultant-led maternity units in the UK (99.5%) and asked about departmental and individual practice regarding temperature management during Caesarean section. Warming during elective Caesarean section was routine in 35 units (16%). Intravenous fluid warmers were available in 213 units (97%), forced air warmers were available in 211 (96%) and warming mattresses were available in 42 (19%). Only 18 (8%) departments had specific guidelines for temperature management during Caesarean section. Personal intra-operative practice was variable, although all of those contacted would initiate some form of active temperature management after a mean (SD) volume of blood loss of 1282 (404) ml, length of surgery of 78 (24) min, or core body temperature (if measured) of median (IQR [range]), 36 (35.5–36 [34–37.2]) °C. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The handover of patient information between shifts enables continuity of care and increases patient safety. We surveyed UK practice during handovers in obstetric anaesthesia. A questionnaire was sent to 239 lead consultant obstetric anaesthetists to record routine practice in their unit and individual opinion about handover procedures. Responses were received from 168 anaesthetists, a 70% response rate. Handover policies were available in 10% of units. Most (76%) responding units had an allocated time for handover. In most units (76%), the duration of handover was reported as being < 15 min but the actual duration and depth of any discussion involved were not specified. Handovers were rarely documented in writing (7%). Consultant anaesthetists were most likely to be present at the morning handover and few handovers were multidisciplinary. Four percent of units reported critical incidents following inadequate handovers in the past 12 months. We identify features in handover procedures that could be improved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Unfractionated heparin is widely used for prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after Caesarean section. We performed a survey of thromboprophylactic methods after elective Caesarean section in 50 maternity units in the United Kingdom. We found that a variety of regimens were used. Thirteen (26%) used subcutaneous unfractionated heparin at standard (non-pregnant) doses. We then studied anti-Xa activity in women following elective Caesarean section under regional anaesthesia. Initially, eight women were given 5000 U unfractionated heparin subcutaneously after surgery and anti-Xa activity was measured 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 h after administration. There was no detectable anti-Xa activity in any of the samples so the dose was increased to 7500 U in a further five women and a single anti-Xa assay performed at 3 h when peak activity should occur. Again, no activity was detected so the dose was increased to 10 000 U heparin in a final group of 10 women and anti-Xa activity measured at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 h. Although there was some activity after 10 000 U heparin, the level was below that accepted for prophylaxis. If anti-Xa activity is an appropriate monitor of prophylactic unfractionated heparin, doses up to 10 000 U are inadequate. Since there is evidence that enoxaparin is effective at producing adequate prophylactic anti-Xa activity following Caesarean section, we suggest abandoning the use of unfractionated heparin in favour of enoxaparin for this purpose. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The author comments on the policy of face mask ventilation (FMV) before the administration of neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBs) to trainee anaesthetists in Great Britain. The argues that theoretical advantage of FMV has not yet fulfilled in the practice and could wake up the patient. The author believes that anaesthetists might underdose the patients or they might be fearful in administering adequate doses at induction.

Both the recent 'Warner' review of the UK research ethics committee (REC) system and the subsequent consultation document produced by the Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) emphasize the need to distinguish 'research' from what might be termed 'non-research'. This is to be determined through a process of filtering or 'triage', the intention being that RECs will avoid considering proposals with 'no material ethical issues'. In this paper we argue that trying to distinguish 'true' research from other projects is counterproductive, misleading and potentially unethical. Our case is built around three assertions: (1) the distinction between research and non-research is imprecise; (2) both medical research and non-research can generate similar ethical issues; and (3) projects should be judged according to what they involve, not how they are labelled. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The author reflects on the collective effort in monitoring and reducing the maternal deaths, as well as improving the safety of childbirth in Great Britain. He says that one of the major achievements of anaesthetists is the reduction of maternal deaths due to anaesthesia. Furthermore, he notes that the ongoing review and reporting of maternal deaths in Great Britain should be continued to support the efforts in improving maternal safety.

Criticizes obstetric units for not following the British Association of Anesthetists' guidelines for Entonox apparatus. Complacency of obstetric units in ensuring that infection through Entonox apparatus is prevented; Need for further investigation of the efficacy of filters in preventing infection through Entonox apparatus.

In this article, the editor discusses aspects on bringing back of the printing and distribution of the journal "Anaesthesia" to Great Britain.

Anaesthetists are thought to be at increased risk of suicide amongst the medical profession. The aims of the following guidelines are: increase awareness of suicide and associated vulnerabilities, risk factors and precipitants; to emphasise safe ways to respond to individuals in distress, both for them and for colleagues working alongside them; and to support individuals, departments and organisations in coping with a suicide., (© 2019 The Authors. Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists.)

We investigated the strength of commonly used spinal needles in relation to the amount of deformation, and registered forces during standardised testing. We investigated differences between manufacturers for the same length and gauge of Luer and non-Luer needles, and examined the effect of the internal stylet in terms of needle strength. A specialised rig was designed to perform the testing in both the horizontal and axial plane, reflecting common industrial tests and clinical use. Needles from four commonly used manufacturers were used (Vygon, Becton Dickinson, B Braun, and Pajunk). Needles of 25 G and 27 G were tested in 90-mm and 120-mm lengths. We found significant differences in terms of the size of final deformation and 'toughness'/resistance to deformation between needles of different brands. There were also significant differences between horizontal tests conducted as an industry standard and our own axial test. This may have bearing on clinical use in terms of the incidence of bending and breakage. The presence of the internal stylet resulted in significantly greater toughness in many needles, but had little effect on the degree of deformation. Comparison of Luer and non-Luer needles of the same brand and size showed few significant differences in strength. This result is reassuring, given the imminent change from Luer to non-Luer needles that is to occur in the UK., (© 2017 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Neuraxial anaesthesia is widely used in obstetrics and neurological complications are rare. However, when they occur, subsequent investigation and management are time-critical and correlate with the extent of neurological recovery. The Third National Audit Project recommended the implementation of guidelines in obstetric epidural management, including advice on monitoring for early signs of problems and acting upon concerns. However, no national guideline exists for postoperative management in the obstetric population. We conducted a national survey of monitoring after obstetric neuraxial blockade and the management of an abnormally prolonged block. We received responses from 112/189 (59.3%) obstetric anaesthetic leads invited to participate. We determined that post-neuraxial blockade monitoring in the UK is highly variable: only 63/112 (56.3%) respondents' units had a monitoring policy in place, although most of these did not undertake formal neurological monitoring, and a range of different monitoring methods and schedules were employed. In 12/63 (19%) local policies, the first review of neurology was performed at the standard postoperative visit the following day, and 66/112 (58.9%) units had no protocol in place to address emergency management of abnormally prolonged neuraxial blockade. Where a policy was in place, the initial recommended action and the type of imaging used were variable., (© 2017 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.)

To determine the publication rate of abstracts as peer-reviewed manuscripts during the five years subsequent to their presentation, the rates of publication of abstracts that were presented at meetings of four anaesthesia societies (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), International Anesthesia Research Society (IARS), Anaesthesia Research Society (ARS) and Canadian Anaesthetists' Society (CAS), in 1985 were determined. Abstracts (total = 215) from each of the four meetings were selected (ASA n = 114/573 total, IARS n = 39/119, ARS n = 33/99 and CAS n = 29/58) and their appearances in the literature as peer-reviewed manuscripts were determined using MEDLINE for the years 1985 to 1990 under the surname of the presenting author. The contents of the abstracts were compared with those of the resultant manuscripts. The proportions of abstracts from each of the four societies that were published as manuscripts were compared. We found that the mean proportion of abstracts from all four societies that were published as manuscripts within three years of presentation was 44% and within five years 50%. The proportions of abstracts that were published as manuscripts from the four societies were similar. Of the abstracts that were published as manuscripts, 13% from the ASA, 16% from the IARS, 16% from the ARS and 0% from the CAS were published four or five years after abstract presentation. Although the overall proportion of abstracts that was published within five years of presentation did not differ from the rate of publication within three years, we recommend that a uniform policy with respect to the time interval for citation of abstracts be adopted for all anaesthesia journals.