Search

Purpose: Ibrutinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is increasingly prescribed in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) have been reported early after ibrutinib initiation. Timing of IFIs is within 6 months and commonly reported fungal infections include Cryptococcus, Aspergillus, and Pneumocystis. Currently, there are no recommendations for routine prophylaxis against IFIs in patients receiving ibrutinib for CLL. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of IFIs in patients receiving ibrutinib for CLL in first-line and relapsed/refractory (R/R) settings. Methods: This was a retrospective, cohort study of patients diagnosed with CLL and initiated on ibrutinib in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) from October 1, 2013 to March 31, 2018. Patients were included if diagnosed with a proven or probable IFI from the start date of ibrutinib to 30 days after the last dose of ibrutinib. Results: Fourteen out of 1069 patients met inclusion criteria for IFI while on ibrutinib for CLL. All patients included were male with a median age of 78 years. Fifty percent of patients were initiated on ibrutinib within 3 months of last chemotherapy. IFIs occurred within 3 months (50%) and 6 months (71%) of ibrutinib initiation. Seventy-one percent of patients were continued on ibrutinib with concurrent IFI diagnosis. Conclusion: The reported IFI incidence of 1.3% is comparable to current estimates of 1.2%. Future studies should examine the relationship of ibrutinib and incidence of IFIs in first-line and R/R settings in addition to identifying clinical risk factors predisposing patients to IFIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although ibrutinib has been widely used to treat haematological malignancies, many studies have reported associated cardiovascular events. These studies were primarily animal experiments and clinical trials. For more rational clinical drug use, a study based on post-marketing data is necessary. Aim: Based on post-marketing data, we investigated the clinical features, time to onset, and outcomes of potential cardiovascular toxicities of ibrutinib. Methods: This disproportionality study utilised data from the 2014–2021 United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. We used two disproportionality methods information component (IC) and reporting odds ratio (ROR)) to detect the potential cardiovascular toxicities of ibrutinib. Positive signals were defined as IC025 > 0 and ROR025 > 1. Results: A total of 10 cardiovascular events showed positive signals: supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, haemorrhagic central nervous system vascular conditions, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, cardiac failure, ischaemic central nervous system vascular conditions, cardiomyopathy, conduction defects, myocardial infarction, myocardial infarction disorders of sinus node function, and torsade de pointes/QT prolongation. Cardiomyopathy and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias were the two most common signals. Disorders of sinus node function were observed for the first time, which may be a new adverse effect of ibrutinib. Conclusions: This pharmacovigilance study systematically explored the adverse cardiovascular events of ibrutinib and provided new safety signals based on past safety information. Attention should be paid to some high-risk signals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: informCLL is the largest US-based prospective, observational registry of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) initiating FDA-approved treatment in the era of targeted therapy., Patients and Methods: Patients were enrolled between October 2015 and June 2019. Data were collected for baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, outcomes, and safety., Results: In total, 1459 eligible patients were enrolled (first line, n = 854; relapsed/refractory, n = 605). The most common index treatments were ibrutinib (first line, 45%; relapsed/refractory, 49%) and chemoimmunotherapy (first line, 43%; relapsed/refractory, 20%). With median follow-up of 31.8 and 30.9 months in first-line and relapsed/refractory cohorts, respectively, median time to next treatment (TTNT) in patients who received any index treatment was not reached (NR) and 48.6 months; estimated proportions without next-line therapy at 48 months were 64% and 50%. Median overall survival (OS) was NR for both cohorts; estimated 48-month OS rates were 81% and 64% in first-line and relapsed/refractory cohorts, respectively. In match-adjusted analyses, TTNT was improved with first-line ibrutinib versus chemoimmunotherapy (median NR vs. 56.5 months; hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56-0.98). Exposure-adjusted rates of AEs leading to discontinuation and serious AEs were lower with ibrutinib versus chemoimmunotherapy. Estimated 36-month OS rates were similar in Black versus White patients who received any index treatment (first line, 87% vs. 83%; relapsed/refractory, 74% vs. 74%) or ibrutinib (first line, 97% vs. 85%; relapsed/refractory, 81% vs. 77%)., Conclusion: In this prospective, large, real-world CLL registry, first-line ibrutinib was associated with longer TTNT than chemoimmunotherapy, with sustained benefit up to 4 years of follow-up., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKIs), including first-generation ibrutinib, second-generation acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib, may be involved in the mechanisms of action related to adverse events (AEs) of the cardiovascular system. We aimed to characterize the cardiovascular AEs of BTKIs reported in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System, and to compare the cardiovascular risks of BTKIs., Methods: Across all indications of three FDA-approved BTKIs, primary suspect drugs were extracted over two periods: from January 2013 to December 2022 (after the approval of the first BTKI), and from January 2020 to December 2022 (all three BTKIs on the market). Disproportionality was measured by reporting odds ratios (RORs) and information components. Additional analyses were performed without incorporating patients with underlying cardiovascular disease (CVD)., Results: A total of 10 353 cases included the uses of ibrutinib, acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib. Ibrutinib was significantly associated with 47 cardiovascular AEs. Acalabrutinib was associated with new signals, including cardiac failure (ROR = 1.82 [1.13-2.93]), pulmonary oedema (ROR = 2.15 [1.19-3.88]), ventricular extrasystoles (ROR = 5.18 [2.15-12.44]), heart rate irregular (ROR = 3.05 [1.53-6.11]), angina pectoris (ROR = 3.18 [1.71-5.91]) and cardiotoxicity (ROR = 25.22 [17.14-37.10]). In addition, cardiovascular events had an earlier onset in acalabrutinib users. Zanubrutinib was only associated with atrial fibrillation. Acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib had lower ROR values than ibrutinib. The AE signals were generally consistent between the population receiving and not receiving CVD medications., Conclusions: Potential cardiovascular risks identified in this study were not clearly noted on the label of marketed acalabrutinib. Caution should be paid to the cardiovascular risks of BTKIs having been or being developed., (© 2024 British Pharmacological Society.)

We analyzed administrative data to determine the 1-year incidence of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in patients beginning small molecule kinase inhibitor (SMKI) therapy. The incidence of IFIs by small molecule kinase inhibitor ranged from 0.0% to 10.6%, with patients taking midostaurin having the highest incidence. An IFI developed in 38 of 1286 patients taking ibrutinib (3.0%). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) are targeted treatments for B-cell tumors but have significant side effects. This study assesses and contrasts the side effects of BTKis alone and its four combination therapies., Research Design and Methods: The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was used to analyze the data on three BTKis monotherapies and combinations of ibrutinib with rituximab, obinutuzumab, venetoclax, and lenalidomide in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database up to December 2022., Results: We analyzed the top 20 PTs for each treatment regimen. In monotherapies, atrial fibrillation (ROR (95% CI): 9.88 (9.47-10.32)) in zanubrutinib and rash (6.97 (5.42-8.98)) in acalabrutinib had higher associations. In combinations, infection (6.86 (6.11-7.70)), atrial fibrillation (27.96 (22.61-34.58)) and myelosuppression (10.09 (8.89-11.46)) were vital signals when ibrutinib was combined with obinutuzumab, and pyrexia (4.22 (2.57-6.93)) had a high signal value when combined with lenalidomide. Hemorrhage had a lower signal value when combined with venetoclax compared to ibrutinib alone (2.50 (2.18-2.87) vs 3.60 (3.52-3.68))., Conclusions: The ibrutinib-obinutuzumab combo has the highest risk of infection, atrial fibrillation, and myelosuppression, and the ibrutinib-lenalidomide combo has the highest risk of pyrexia. However, the ibrutinib-venetoclax combo has a lower risk of hemorrhage than monotherapy.

Summary: The experience of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) in community oncology practices, including reasons for treatment discontinuation, is sparse. This retrospective study sought to elucidate treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with MCL treated with ibrutinib in the community setting. Patients were identified from the US Oncology Network electronic medical records database, iKnowMedTM, between 1 November 2013 and 31 October 2016. Descriptive analysis was performed to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of the population. Kaplan–Meier estimates were performed to determine clinical outcomes. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify predictors of survival. Of the 1914 patients identified with MCL, 159 were treated with ibrutinib. The median age was 71 years and the majority were male (76%) and Caucasian (89%). The overall discontinuation rate was 83·6%; the most common reasons were progression (35%) and toxicities (25·6%). The median overall survival and progression‐free survival was 25·82 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 19·94, NR) and 19·55 months (95% CI 16·52, 24·28) respectively. In multivariate modelling, patient age was predictive of survival (hazard ratio 1·041, P = 0·0186). Ibrutinib was temporarily reduced in 16·4% (n = 26) and held in 30·2% (n = 48), primarily due to toxicity 66·7% (n = 32). Survival data showed similarities between community oncology practices and clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The first-generation BTK inhibitor ibrutinib is a standard-of-care therapy in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) despite potential side effects that often lead to discontinuation., Methods: This study used 2013-2019 claims data to describe the incidence rate of adverse events (AEs) among elderly Medicare beneficiaries newly initiating ibrutinib for CLL., Results: The final sample contained 11,870 Medicare beneficiaries with CLL (mean age 77.2) newly initiating ibrutinib, of whom 65.2% discontinued over mean follow-up of 2.3 years. The overall incidence rate of AEs was 62.5 per 1000 patient-months for all discontinuers and 32.9 per 1000 patient-months for non-discontinuers. Discontinuers had a higher incidence rate of AEs per 1000 patient-months compared with non-discontinuers for all AEs examined, including infection (22.8 vs. 14.5), atrial fibrillation (15.1 vs. 7.0), anemia (21.9 vs. 14.5), and arthralgia/myalgia (19.5 vs. 13.6)., Conclusion: In this first real-world study of a national sample of elderly US patients treated with ibrutinib, we found a clear unmet need for improved management of ibrutinib-related AEs and/or new treatments to improve real-world outcomes in patients with CLL., (© 2024 Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Prior studies evaluating ibrutinib discontinuation are limited to clinical trials and selected medical centers and hence may not reflect real-world practice. This study used Medicare claims (2013-2019) to examine ibrutinib discontinuation and associated factors among elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Over a median follow-up of 2.1 years, two-thirds (65.2%) of the 11,870 new ibrutinib initiators were discontinued, with half (45.1%) of patients discontinuing within 12 months of initiation. Factors such as advanced age, lack of Part D low-income subsidy, evidence of prior CLL/SLL treatment, and cardiovascular comorbidities (e.g. atrial fibrillation) were associated with higher risk of discontinuation. Over a median of 1.2 years from discontinuation, 40% of discontinuers initiated another CLL/SLL treatment after ibrutinib discontinuation; 25% of patients restarted ibrutinib treatment at some point over follow-up. Our findings point to a large unmet need with the widely used BTKi ibrutinib and underscore the importance of ongoing development of efficacious and well-tolerated CLL/SLL therapies.

Background: Ibrutinib, idelalisib, and venetoclax are approved for treating CLL patients in the United States. However, there is no guidance as to their optimal sequence. Patients and methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis of CLL patients treated with kinase inhibitors (KIs) or venetoclax. We examined demographics, discontinuation reasons, overall response rates (ORR), survival, and post-KI salvage strategies. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 683 patients were identified. Baseline characteristics were similar in the ibrutinib and idelalisib groups. ORR to ibrutinib and idelalisib as first KI was 69% and 81%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 17 months (range 1-60), median PFS and OS for the entire cohort were 35 months and not reached. Patients treated with ibrutinib (versus idelalisib) as first KI had a significantly better PFS in all settings; front-line [hazard ratios (HR) 2.8, CI 1.3-6.3, P = 0.01], relapsed-refractory (HR 2.8, CI 1.9-4.1, P < 0.001), del17p (HR 2.0, CI 1.2-3.4, P = 0.008), and complex karyotype (HR 2.5, CI 1.2-5.2, P = 0.02). At the time of initial KI failure, use of an alternate KI or venetoclax had a superior PFS when compared with chemoimmunotherapy. Furthermore, patients who discontinued ibrutinib due to progression or toxicity had marginally improved outcomes if they received venetoclax (ORR 79%) versus idelalisib (ORR 46%) (PFS HR .6, CI.3-1.0, P = 0.06). Conclusions: In the largest real-world experience of novel agents in CLL, ibrutinib appears superior to idelalisib as first KI. Furthermore, in the setting of KI failure, alternate KI or venetoclax therapy appear superior to chemoimmunotherapy combinations. The use of venetoclax upon ibrutinib failure might be superior to idelalisib. These data support the need for trials testing sequencing strategies to optimize treatment algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ibrutinib, a Bruton’s kinase inhibitor, was granted an accelerated approval by the US Food and Drug Administration in November, 2013, for the treatment of relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma and subsequently for the treatment of relapsed refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in February, 2014. In the pivotal phase 2 study of 111 patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma, the overall response rate in patients who received ibrutinib 560 mg daily was 68%. The median progression-free survival was 13.9 months, and the overall survival was 58% at 18 months. In a recently published phase 3 trial (RESONATE) that compared ibrutinib and ofatumumab for the treatment of relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma, ibrutinib at the daily dosage of 420 mg demonstrated a significantly higher overall response rate (43% in ibrutinib vs. 4% in ofatumumab) and a significantly improved overall survival at 12 months (90% ibrutinib vs. 81% ofatumumab). Similar clinical benefits were shown regardless of del (17 p). Ibrutinib was well tolerated, and dose-limiting toxicity was not observed. Ibrutinib has shown durable remission, improved progression-free survival and overall survival, and favorable safety profile in indolent B-cell lymphoid malignancies. Ibrutinib, as a monotherapy, is an effective treatment modality as a salvage therapy for treatment of mantle cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia / small lymphocytic lymphoma, particularly in older patients (age ≥70 years) who are not a candidate for intensive chemotherapy and/or those with del (17 p). In patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and del (17 p), the current practice guideline recommends ibrutinib as an upfront treatment option. Current on-going trials will further define its role as upfront therapy and/or as a combination therapy in indolent B-cell lymphoid malignancies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a potentially life-threatening complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clinical data surrounding cGVHD therapies in younger children are limited and critically needed. Primary endpoints were to determine the recommended pediatric equivalent dose (RPED) and assess pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR; comprising complete response and partial response) according to the 2014 National Institutes of Health criteria at 24 weeks, overall survival, and duration of response (DOR). Here we present the primary results from the open-label, multicenter, international phase 1/2 iMAGINE study (PCYC-1146-IM), which evaluated the PK, safety, and efficacy of ibrutinib in patients age ≥1 to <22 years with treatment-naive (TN) or relapsed/refractory (R/R) moderate/severe cGVHD. Patients age <12 years received once-daily ibrutinib starting at 120 mg/m 2 and escalating to 240 mg/m 2 (full adult dose equivalent) after 14 days if free from ibrutinib-related grade ≥3 toxicity; patients age ≥12 years received once-daily ibrutinib 420 mg. Fifty-nine patients (12 TN and 47 with R/R cGVHD; median age, 13 years; range, 1 to 19 years) were enrolled. Plasma concentration-time profiles for ibrutinib 240 mg/m 2 (the RPED) were comparable to those observed in adults with cGVHD at a dose of 420 mg/day. Safety was consistent with the known profile of ibrutinib in cGVHD. ORR by 24 weeks was 64% (38 of 59), including 83% (10 of 12) for the TN subgroup and 60% (28 of 47) for R/R. Among 46 responders (median follow-up, 20 months; range, 2 to 32 months), 12-month DOR for each subgroup was 60% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25% to 83%) in TN patients and 58% (95% CI, 35% to 75%) in R/R patients. Responses were durable, with numerically higher rates than those previously observed with ibrutinib in adults, demonstrating that ibrutinib provides clinically meaningful activity with acceptable safety in children with moderate/severe cGVHD., (Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. For many years, there have been few effective treatment options for patients with GVHD. First-line systemic treatment remains corticosteroids, but up to 50% of patients will develop steroid-refractory GVHD and the prognosis for these patients is poor. Elucidation of the pathophysiological mechanisms of acute and chronic GVHD has laid a foundation for novel therapeutic approaches. Since 2017, there have now been 4 approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for GVHD. Ruxolitinib, an oral selective JAK1/2 inhibitor, received FDA approval for the treatment of steroid-refractory acute GVHD in 2019 and remains the only agent approved for acute GVHD. There are currently 3 FDA approvals for the treatment of chronic GVHD: (1) ibrutinib, a BTK inhibitor traditionally used for B-cell malignancies, was the first agent approved for chronic GVHD after failure of one or more lines of systemic therapy, (2) belumosudil, an oral selective inhibitor of ROCK2, for patients with chronic GVHD who received at least 2 prior lines of treatment, and (3) ruxolitinib for chronic GVHD after failure of one or two lines of systemic therapy. In this review, we highlight the clinical data which support these FDA approvals in acute and chronic GVHD with a focus on mechanism of actions, clinical efficacy, and toxicities associated with these agents., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a serious complication after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. There are no well-established treatment options for cGVHD after primary steroid-based treatment. Ibrutinib showed clinical benefit with an acceptable safety profile in steroid-dependent/refractory cGVHD patients in a Phase 1b/2 study (PCYC-1129-CA, NCT02195869), with which it was approved in the United States for adult cGVHD patients after failure of ≥1 systemic treatments. This open-label, single-arm, multicenter study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ibrutinib in Japanese patients ≥12 years of age with steroid-dependent/refractory cGVHD (NCT03474679). Patients were assessed on the basis of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Development Project Criteria for Clinical Trials in cGVHD (2014). All patients received ibrutinib at a dose of 420 mg orally once daily, with a dose reduction to 280 mg/d on the concomitant use of voriconazole. Nineteen patients, including 1 adolescent, were enrolled and treated with ibrutinib in the study. At the time of clinical data cutoff (when the last patient completed the efficacy assessment at week 37), 10 of 19 patients (52.6%) remained on treatment whereas 9 of 19 patients (47.4%) had discontinued ibrutinib. The median duration of ibrutinib treatment was 9.63 (range 0.6 to 16.7+) months. The best overall response rate was 73.7%, and the rate of sustained response for ≥20 weeks was 71.4% for the responders (52.6% of all patients). Responses were seen across all the involved organs for cGVHD. Median daily corticosteroid dose requirement decreased by 0.06 mg/kg/d from baseline to week 36, whereas an improvement in the Lee cGVHD Symptom Scale score was observed in 42.1% of patients. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were pneumonia and stomatitis (36.8% each), upper respiratory tract infection (31.6%), cellulitis and platelet count decreased (26.3% each), and nausea (21.1%). Furthermore, 11 of 19 patients (57.9%) were reported with ≥1 treatment-emergent serious adverse events; the most common being pneumonia (26.3%) and cellulitis (15.8%). In total, 4 of 19 patients (21.1%) died during the study, of which 3 of 19 patients (15.8%) had TEAEs leading to death whereas 1 patient died of peritonitis, which occurred >30 days after the last dose of ibrutinib. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to ibrutinib discontinuation were reported in 3 of 19 patients (15.8%). Ibrutinib was rapidly absorbed with a median time to reach maximum plasma concentration (t max ) of ~4.0 hours. Steady-state exposures were ~3.0- and ~1.4-fold higher for the patients receiving fluconazole (n = 8) and voriconazole (n = 4) with ibrutinib, respectively, as compared with patients not receiving CYP3A inhibitors (n = 7). Mean Bruton's tyrosine kinase occupancy was 88.1% at 4 hours after dose on day 1, and occupancy levels were maintained throughout the assessment period, regardless of the ibrutinib daily dose. Ibrutinib showed a clinically meaningful response and an acceptable safety profile in Japanese patients with steroid-dependent/refractory cGVHD; the safety profile was consistent with the known safety profile of ibrutinib in adults and with that seen in cGVHD patients receiving concomitant steroid treatment. Overall, the results were generally consistent with findings observed in the PCYC-1129-CA study., (Copyright © 2021 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This retrospective observational study aimed to compare healthcare resource utilization and costs of Medicare beneficiaries with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) who received ibrutinib versus chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) in first line (1 L)., Methods: Fee-for-service (FFS) and Medicare Advantage (MA) claims data were used to identify adults with a CLL/SLL diagnosis initiating 1 L ibrutinib single agent or CIT between 4 March 2016 and 30 September 2017 (index date). HRU and costs (Medicare spending) were evaluated during 1 L Oncology Care Model (1 L OCM) episodes (the first six months post-index) and over the observed 1 L duration. Patients' baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Mean monthly cost differences (MMCDs) obtained from ordinary least square regressions were used to compare costs between ibrutinib and CIT cohorts., Results: In the Medicare FFS dataset (ibrutinib: n  = 2014; CIT: n  = 2050), ibrutinib patients incurred significantly higher monthly pharmacy costs (1 L OCM: MMCD = $4878, p  < .0001; 1 L duration: MMCD= $4892, p  < .0001) that were fully offset by lower monthly medical costs (1 L OCM: MMCD= -$8289, p  < .0001; 1 L duration: MMCD=-$5888, p  < .0001), yielding a monthly total healthcare cost reduction (1 L OCM: MMCD=-$3411, p  < .0001; 1 L duration: MMCD=-$996, p  < .0001) relative to CIT patients. In the MA dataset (ibrutinib: n  = 293; CIT: n  = 303), ibrutinib was also associated with a monthly total healthcare cost reduction (1 L OCM: MMCD=-$10,459; 1 L duration: MMCD=-$5492)., Conclusions: In Medicare patients with CLL/SLL, 1 L ibrutinib single agent was associated with total monthly cost savings relative to 1 L CIT, driven by lower monthly medical costs that fully offset higher monthly pharmacy costs.

Limited information is available on the efficacy of front-line bendamustine and rituximab (BR) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with reduced renal function or coexisting conditions. We therefore analyzed a cohort of real-world patients and performed a matched adjusted indirect comparison with a cohort of patients treated with ibrutinib. One hundred and fifty-seven patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) <70 mL/min and/or CIRS score >6 were treated with BR. The median age was 72 years; 69% of patients had ≥2 comorbidities and the median CrCl was 59.8 mL/min. 17.6% of patients carried TP53 disruption. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 45 months; TP53 disruption was associated with a shorter PFS (P = 0.05). The overall survival (OS) at 12, 24, and 36 months was 96.2%, 90.1%, and 79.5%, respectively. TP53 disruption was associated with an increased risk of death (P = 0.01). Data on 162 patients ≥65 years treated with ibrutinib were analyzed and compared with 165 patients ≥65 years treated with BR. Factors predicting for a longer PFS at multivariable analysis in the total patient population treated with BR and ibrutinib were age (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.10, P < 0.01) and treatment with ibrutinib (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33-0.93, P = 0.03). In a post hoc analysis of patients in advanced stage, a significant PFS advantage was observed in patient who had received ibrutinib (P = 0.03), who showed a trend for OS advantage (P = 0.08). We arrived at the following conclusions: (a) BR is a relatively effective first-line regimen in a real-world population of unfit patients without TP53 disruption, (b) ibrutinib provided longer disease control than BR in patients with advanced disease stage., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The US Food and Drug Administration granted acalabrutinib approval as the second Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor to treat patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma as monotherapy or in combination with obinutuzumab. This approval was based on 2 phase 3 trials: ELEVATE-TN and ASCEND. There are several concerns with the design of these trials, including suboptimal treatment of patients in the control arm, expansion of the trial population, and lack of data regarding efficacy or tolerability compared with ibrutinib, a first-in-class drug. The Food and Drug Administration approval of acalabrutinib for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma represents concerning drug approval patterns in the United States and a weakness in evidence generation., (© 2020 American Cancer Society.)

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients are at increased risk for major hemorrhage (MH). We examined incidence of and risk factors for MH in CLL patients before introduction of newer CLL therapies such as ibrutinib, which includes bleeding risk. This study included 24 198 CLL patients treated in the VA system before FDA approval of ibrutinib as CLL therapy. Data came from VA databases from 1999 to 2013. MH incidence was 1.9/100 person-years (95% CI: 1.8-1.9), with cumulative incidences of 2.3%, 5.2%, and 7.3% by year 1, 3, and 5, respectively. Median time from CLL diagnosis to MH was 2.8 years (range: 0-15.7 years). In multivariate analyses, concurrent anticoagulant and antiplatelet use (HR: 4.2; 95% CI: 3.2-5.6), anticoagulant use only (HR: 2.6; 95% CI: 2.3-3.1), and antiplatelet use only (HR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.3-1.7) increased MH risk vs not receiving those medications; being nonwhite, male, having MH history, renal impairment, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and alcohol abuse were associated with increased MH risk. These pre-ibrutinib data are important for providing context for interpreting MH risk in ibrutinib-treated patients. As ibrutinib clinical use is increasing, updated analyses of MH risk among ibrutinib-treated VA patients with CLL may provide additional useful insight., (© 2019 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Novel targeted therapies - including ibrutinib, venetoclax, and idelalisib - have revolutionized the treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Therefore, studying combinations of novel agents (NAs) with a distinct mechanism of action and nonoverlapping toxicities is challenging. Area covered: The 2017 American Society Hematology Annual Meeting has represented a showcase for several trials combining NAs. These studies are currently evaluating the efficacy NA plus anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, NA plus NA (with or without anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody), and NA plus chemo-immunotherapy. Expert commentary: The development of well-tolerated, highly effective combination strategies with curative potential for patients with CLL is becoming a realistic goal in CLL. From a practical standpoint, it is hard to determine which regimen will be most beneficial. Until studies of association will provide more mature results, the sequencing of NA remains a reasonable approach.