Search

The transition from adolescence to adulthood is difficult for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and their families because they must learn to navigate the complex adult disability service delivery system. For Latinx (vs. White) families of youth with ASD, this period is especially difficult because of the systemic barriers (e.g., language and cultural differences) they face when accessing services. To support Latinx families, effective and culturally responsive supports (e.g. culturally tailored programs) are critical. To this end, the purpose of this study is to describe the cultural adaptation of a transition planning program (i.e., ASSIST) for Latinx families of youth with ASD. First, we culturally adapted the curriculum using the Ecological Validity Framework (Bernal et al., 1995) and the Cultural Sensitivity (CS) model (Resnicow et al., 1999). Then, we presented the culturally adapted curriculum to eight Mexican–American caregivers of youth with ASD. Specifically, we conducted three individual interviews with each participant (N = 24 interviews altogether) to examine their perceptions of the six sessions of the culturally adapted curriculum. Based on their feedback, changes were made to the curriculum. Overall, participants reported positive perceptions of the culturally adapted curriculum, but suggested the following recommendations: include information related to mixed‐status families, add information about guardianship, and use the translation technique of borrowing for specific terms. Based on the findings, implications for research and practice are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Internationally, parents of children with intellectual and developmental disabilities have historically engaged in advocacy leading to compulsory education for their children. However, few parents have reported civic engagement. Although empowerment is related to parent advocacy, it is unclear whether empowerment relates to civic engagement. Thus, our study examined parent and child correlates of empowerment and civic engagement, and the relation between empowerment and civic engagement among 235 parents of children with intellectual and developmental disabilities across five states in the United States. Gender and special education knowledge were significant correlates of empowerment and civic engagement. There was a significant positive correlation between empowerment and civic engagement. Implications regarding future research and ways to promote parent empowerment and civic engagement are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: As adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) have longer lives, parents may remain caregivers into old age. In addition, it is unknown who will fulfil caregiving roles after parents are no longer able to be caregivers. In the current study, we explored the nature (e.g. number of hours of caregiving) and correlates of parental caregiving for their adult offspring with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their future caregiving plans. Method: In the United States, data were collected from 334 parents of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities via a national survey. Results: Altogether, 55% of the sample spent more than 15 hr conducting caregiving per week. Individual characteristics (e.g. maladaptive behaviour and functional abilities) and parent characteristics (e.g. physical proximity of the adult with intellectual and developmental disabilities and caregiving ability) positively correlated with caregiving hours. Notably, 38.58% of participants were unsure who would fulfil caregiving roles. Conclusion: Implications for research about caregiving and practice are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although parent involvement is a cornerstone of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), few individual parents of children with disabilities participate in civic engagement to voice their suggestions for the next IDEA reauthorization. To address this gap, a civic engagement training was conducted with 95 parents of children with disabilities across four states. At the end of the training, participants completed videotaped testimonials voicing their suggestions for the next IDEA reauthorization. Participant suggestions clustered around three themes: expanding IDEA to address specific concerns; adding text to provide specificity and clarity in IDEA; and implementing the current version of IDEA. Implications for research and policy are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]