Search

Venetoclax, a highly selective BCL‐2 inhibitor, combined with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) azacitidine or decitabine, is approved for the treatment of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (ND AML) in patients who are ineligible to receive intensive chemotherapy. Previous clinical studies initiated venetoclax plus HMA in an inpatient setting owing to concerns of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). This study (NCT03941964) evaluated the efficacy and safety of venetoclax plus HMA in a United States community–based outpatient setting in patients with ND AML (N = 60) who were treatment naïve for AML, ineligible to receive intensive chemotherapy, had no evidence of spontaneous TLS at screening, and were deemed as appropriate candidates for outpatient initiation of venetoclax plus HMA by the investigator. Patients received venetoclax in combination with azacitidine (75 mg/m2) or decitabine (20 mg/m2) for up to 6 cycles during the study. With a median time on study of 18.3 weeks, the best response rate of composite complete remission was 66.7%, and the overall post‐baseline red blood cell (RBC) and platelet transfusion independence rate was 55.0%, consistent with results of studies in which treatment was initiated in an inpatient setting. Key adverse events included nausea, anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and white blood cell count decrease of any grade (≥50% of patients). The observed safety profile was generally consistent with that of venetoclax plus HMA observed in inpatient AML studies. With close monitoring, 2 cases of TLS were identified, appropriately managed, and the patients were able to continue study treatment. Clinical Trials Registration: This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The registration identification number is NCT03941964. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ivosidenib + azacitidine (IVO/AZA) is approved in the United States for newly diagnosed, older or intensive chemotherapy-ineligible patients with IDH1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia. We created a partitioned survival analysis model to evaluate the health economic implications of this approval. Model outputs were used to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of IVO/AZA versus AZA. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. In the base case scenario, IVO/AZA and AZA resulted in life-time costs of $403,062 and $161,887, respectively. With an incremental gain of 0.95 QALYs, the ICER of IVO/AZA was $252,782/QALY. In sensitivity analyses, only a reduction in the price of IVO by 59.3% lowered the ICER to below $150,000/QALY and 99.95% of model calculations yielded ICERs of >$150,000/QALY. In a model in which all patients received IVO monotherapy after progression on AZA monotherapy, the ICER was $155,453/QALY and various model inputs that would make IVO/AZA cost-effective were identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Treatment decisions in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are challenging, particularly for those who are not candidates for intensive chemotherapy (IC), and the trade-offs patients, their families and physicians consider when choosing a treatment option are not well understood. This qualitative research explored the value of extending survival and the treatment decision-making process from a multi-stakeholder perspective. Methods: Overall, 28 patients with AML (≥ 65 years old, unsuitable for IC), 25 of their relatives and 10 independent physicians from the US, UK and Canada took part in one-on-one, 60-minute qualitative interviews. Results: Across all stakeholders, improved health-related quality of life (HRQoL), extended survival and relief of AML symptoms were recognized as most important in AML treatment decision-making. However, extending survival in 'good health' was more important than extending survival alone, particularly because of the extra time it gives patients and their relatives together, and allows patients to achieve important goals. Patients' limited understanding of available treatment options, paired with incorrect perceptions of treatment side effects, impacted their involvement in the treatment decision-making process. Patients and physicians perceived physicians to have the most influence in the decision-making process despite their priorities not always aligning. Conclusion: These findings illustrate the importance of having structured discussions which explicitly assess patients' goals and their understanding and expectations of treatments and also the need for patient friendly resources about the lived experience of AML and available treatment options. These measures will help to ensure that patients are fully involved in the shared decision-making process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Understanding the global epidemiology of AML is critical for assessing therapeutic demand and informing healthcare resource allocation. This study estimated current and future AML incidence in 27 countries, described AML survival trends in the United States, and calculated average years of life lost (AYLL). Incidence rates were age-standardized using rates from IARC's Cancer Incidence in Five Continents and SEER databases and ranged from 0.70 to 3.23 cases per 100,000 persons. Crude incidence rates were projected from 2024 to 2040; growth varied from +1% to +46%. Median overall survival was derived from SEER databases and increased from 4 to 11 months over the last 40 years. Median AYLL of 18.6 years was estimated for 27 countries. This study projected significant growth in new AML diagnoses over the next two decades. Despite improvements in survival over the last four decades, median survival among AML patients remains poor highlighting the need for novel treatments.

Standardized morphological evaluation in pathology is usually qualitative. Classifying and qualitatively analyzing the nucleated cells in the bone marrow aspirate images based on morphology is crucial for the diagnosis of acute myoid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), etc. However, it is time-consuming and difficult to accurately identify nucleated cells and calculate the percentage of the cells because of the complexity of bone marrow aspirate images. This paper proposed a deep learning analysis model of bone marrow aspirate images, termed Cell Detection and Confirmation Network (CDC-NET), for the aided diagnosis of AML by improving the accuracy of cell detection and recognition. Specifically, we take the nucleated cells in the bone marrow aspirate images as the detection objects to establish the model. Since some cells from different categories have similar morphology, classification error is inevitable. We design a confirmation network in which multiple trained classifiers work as pathologists to confirm the cell category by a voting method. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, experiments on clinical microscopic datasets are conducted. The Recall and Precision of CDC-NET are 78.54% and 91.74% respectively, and the missed rate of our method is lower than those of the other popular methods. The experimental results demonstrated that the proposed model has the potential for the pathological analysis of aspirate smears and the aided diagnosis of AML., (© 2023. International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering.)

Background: The majority of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are aged >65 years at the time of diagnosis and are not actively treated. The objective of the current study was to determine the prevalence, temporal trends, and factors associated with no active treatment (NAT) among older patients with AML in the United States.Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data from 14,089 patients with AML residing in the United States who were diagnosed with AML at age ≥66 years during 2001 through 2013. NAT was defined as not receiving any chemotherapy, including hypomethylating agents. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to analyze sociodemographic, clinical, and provider characteristics associated with NAT.Results: The percentage of patients with NAT decreased over time from 59.7% among patients diagnosed in 2001 to 42.8% among those diagnosed in 2013. The median overall survival for the entire cohort was 82 days from the time of diagnosis. Patients treated with NAT had worse survival compared with those receiving active treatment. Variables found to be associated with higher odds of NAT included older age, certain sociodemographic characteristics (household income within the lowest quartile, residence outside the Northeast region of the United States, and being unmarried), and clinical factors (≥3 comorbidities, the presence of mental disorders, recent hospitalization, and disability).Conclusions: Greater than one-half of older patients with AML residing in the United States do not receive any active leukemia-directed therapy despite the availability of lower intensity therapies such as hypomethylating agents. Lack of active therapy receipt is associated with inferior survival. Identifying predictors of NAT might improve the quality of care and survival in this patient population, especially as novel therapeutic options with lower toxicity are becoming available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: There is limited understanding concerning the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Due to an overlap of symptoms, it can be difficult to separate disease versus treatment-related effects. Study objectives were to understand the impact of factors that might influence patients' HRQoL, assess the degree of concordance in symptom reporting by patients and physicians, and assess the impact of any discordance on HRQoL in AML patients. Methods: Physicians in the USA captured demographics, current AML treatment and symptoms for 82 AML patients who completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu), 5-Dimension EuroQol Questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) and Cancer Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ). Effect size (ES) and clinically meaningful differences between AML subgroups were assessed, as was the impact of disagreement between patients and physicians regarding symptom recognition. Results: Clinically meaningful lower overall FACT-Leu scores were observed for: relapsed/refractory versus non-relapsed/refractory AML patients (92.5 vs. 103.7; P = 0.09; ES = 0.439), hypomethylating agent (HMA) monotherapy versus other therapies in patients with low treatment intensity (89.9 vs. 112.9; P = 0.0021; ES = 0.971) and presence/absence of FLT3-ITD mutation (85.5 vs. 100; P = 0.148; ES = 0.816). Differences in health state were also clinically meaningful between patients with/without FLT3-ITD; EQ-5D-Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (47.6 vs. 63.7; P = 0.0428; ES = 0.816). Patients were more likely than physicians to report bruising (κ = 0.1292), fatigue (κ = 0.0836), bleeding (κ = 0.0177), weight loss (κ = 0.0821) and appetite loss (κ = − 0.0246). FACT-Leu was associated with patient-physician discordance on bleeding (difference − 14.12; P = 0.046), weight loss (− 21.22; P = 0.001) and appetite loss (− 12.58; P = 0.027). Conclusions: HRQoL is generally low for AML patients, especially for particular subgroups. Discordance in symptom reporting between patients and physicians was common and associated with further negative impacts on HRQoL. There may be many reasons for this but better communication between physicians and patients may lead to shared objectives and improvement in patients' HRQoL. Funding: Astellas Pharma, Inc. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Through the years gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) has moved from a panacea in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to a pariah and back again. Early promise of targeted therapy with accelerated approval in the United States in 2000 gave way to fear over increased toxicity in the absence of efficacy, which subsequently resulted in the drug manufacturer voluntarily withdrawing GO from the market in 2010. We outline the history of GO in terms of initial drug development and early clinical trials that ultimately led the way to GO frontline use in AML based on a series of Phase III studies. Among these studies, we discuss the similarities and differences in terms of dosing, frequency, response rates, and toxicities that ultimately led to the re-approval of GO in 2017 based on efficacy, particularly in patients with core-binding factor (CBF) leukemia. Herein, we also review the clinical efficacy of GO in the frontline treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia, which is based on either initial patient high-risk disease or potential co-morbidities that preclude the use of arsenic trioxide (ATO). Finally, we assess the current evidence for biomarkers aside from initial cytogenetics that may predict a favorable response to GO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Transformation of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may be associated with increased healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs. To describe this economic impact, HCRU and costs were compared between US patients who experienced transformation to AML and those who did not., Methods: Using the Optum administrative claims data, this retrospective matched cohort study identified patients (≥ 18 years old) with higher-risk MDS who initiated first-line therapy between January 1, 2008, and June 30, 2019. Patients whose disease transformed to AML were matched 1:1 to patients whose disease did not transform, based on the duration of follow-up. The follow-up period was divided into two periods: pre- (before transformation to AML) and post-AML (after transformation to AML). For patients who did not transform to AML, pre- and post-AML periods were determined using the transformation date of their matched pair. HCRU and total adjusted costs (2019 US dollars, $) were compared between patients who transformed to AML and those who did not., Results: A total of 118 matched patient pairs were included in the study. The hospitalization rate was significantly higher in patients who transformed than in those who did not during the entire follow-up (58.8% vs. 44.1%; P = 0.0295) and post-AML (47.5% vs. 28.0%; P = 0.0028) periods. Across all periods, supportive care use was significantly higher among patients who transformed to AML vs. patients who did not transform. Adjusted mean monthly costs for patients with higher-risk MDS who transformed to AML were higher than those who did not transform ($25,964 vs. $19,150; P < 0.0001). The observed total cost difference was more notable in the post-AML period ($36,424 vs. $14,860; P < 0.0001)., Conclusions: Patients with higher-risk MDS whose disease transformed to AML incurred significantly higher healthcare costs compared to those whose disease did not transform, highlighting the important need for treatments that prevent or delay transformation., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

As part of the Voluntary Children's Chemical Evaluation Program (VCCEP) program, a risk assessment was performed to evaluate the risks to children from environmental benzene exposures. This paper summarizes this risk assessment. Risk was characterized using two distinct methods: USEPA's default type of risk assessment, which used the Reference Dose (RfD) and Cancer Slope Factor (CSF) to characterize non-cancer and cancer risks, as well as a Margin of Safety (MOS) approach that utilized a point of departure (POD). The exposures for most scenarios evaluated in this VCCEP risk assessment are lower than both the cancer and non-cancer PODs by several orders of magnitude, indicating a large MOS and corresponding low potential for toxicity at these exposures. The highest benzene exposures likely experienced by children, associated with the lowest MOS, are from cigarette smoke. In addition, the potential for age-related differences in the sensitivity towards benzene-induced toxicity was investigated. In general, this risk assessment does not indicate that children are likely to be at a elevated risk of AML or hematopoietic toxicity associated with environmental exposures to benzene. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The identification of aberrant cellular pathways and dysfunctional molecules important in neoplastic transformation has begun to provide us with a number of targets for drug development. It is likely that many of these agents will be incorporated into our existing treatment strategies that include cytotoxic agents. Sorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor has been approved in the United States for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma as well as hepatocellular cancer. Its potential role in hematological malignancies, particularly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is under evaluation. Here we describe the biological pathways in AML that are the potential targets of sorafenib action and discuss the early clinical data with the agent in solid tumors and AML. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND. Sixteen children diagnosed with acute leukemia between 1997 and 2002 lived in Churchill County, Nevada, at the time of or before their illness. Considering the county population and statewide cancer rate, fewer than two cases would be expected. OBJECTIVES. In March 2001, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention led federal, state, and local agencies in a cross-sectional, case-comparison study to determine if ongoing environmental exposures posed a health risk to residents and to compare levels of contaminants in environmental and biologic samples collected from participating families. METHODS. Surveys with more than 500 variables were administered to 205 people in 69 families. Blood, urine, and cheek cell samples were collected and analyzed for 139 chemicals, eight viral markers, and several genetic polymorphisms. Air, water, soil, and dust samples were collected from almost 80 homes to measure more than 200 chemicals. RESULTS. The scope of this cancer cluster investigation exceeded any previous study of pediatric leukemia. Nonetheless, no exposure consistent with leukemia risk was identified. Overall, tungsten and arsenic levels in urine and water samples were significantly higher than national comparison values; however, levels were similar among case and comparison groups. CONCLUSIONS. Although the cases in this cancer cluster may in fact have a common etiology, their small number and the length of time between diagnosis and our exposure assessment lessen the ability to find an association between leukemia and environmental exposures. Given the limitations of individual cancer cluster investigations, it may prove more efficient to pool laboratory and questionnaire data from similar leukemia clusters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Cytokine release syndrome is a potentially life-threatening complication of therapy with T-cell engaging bispecific antibodies. Here we evaluated the risk, characteristics and biomarkers of treatment-emergent cytokine release syndrome in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome who received weekly intravenous infusions of the CD3xCD123 bispecific antibody APVO436. Cytokine release syndrome was encountered in 10 of 46 patients (21.7%) treated with APVO436 with a cumulative Grade 3/4 cytokine release syndrome incidence of 8.7%. Cytokine profiling in patients who developed cytokine release syndrome after APVO436 infusion indicated that the predominant cytokine in this inflammatory cytokine response was IL-6. The findings from this research provide new insights regarding the biology and effective management of cytokine release syndrome in leukemia patients treated with T-cell redirecting bispecific antibodies. We evaluate the risk, characteristics and biomarkers of treatment-emergent cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who received APVO436 during the dose-escalation phase of a Phase 1B study (ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03647800). Of four patients who developed Grade ≥ 3 CRS, two received steroid prophylaxis. The dose level, gender, race, obesity, or baseline hematologic parameters in peripheral blood did not predict the risk of CRS. Patients with a higher leukemia burden as determined by a higher total WBC, higher percentage of blasts in bone marrow, or higher percentage of blasts in peripheral blood (by hematopathology or immunophenotyping) did not have a higher incidence of CRS. There was an age difference between patients who did versus patients who did not develop CRS (72.9 ± 1.6 years (Median 73.5 years) vs. 63.3 ± 2.3 years (Median: 65.0 years), which was borderline significant (p = 0.04). Premedication with steroids did not eliminate the risk of CRS. Cytokine profiling in patients who developed CRS after APVO436 infusion indicates that the predominant cytokine in this inflammatory cytokine response was IL-6. APVO436-associated CRS was generally manageable with tocilizumab with or without dexamethasone. Notably, the development of CRS after APVO436 therapy did not appear to be associated with a response. The prolonged stabilization of disease, partial remissions and complete remissions were achieved in both patients who experienced CRS, as well as patients who did not experience CRS after APVO436 infusions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The clinical development of antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) has gained momentum in recent years and these agents are gradually moving into frontline regimens for pediatric acute leukemias. ADCs consist of a monoclonal antibody attached to a cytotoxic payload by a cleavable linker. This structure allows for highly cytotoxic agents to be directly delivered to leukemia cells leading to cell death and avoids excessive off-tumor toxicity. Near universal expression on B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) blasts and the ability of rapid internalization has rendered CD22 an ideal target for ADC in B-ALL. Inotuzumab ozogamicin, the anti-CD22 antibody linked to calicheamicin led to complete remission rates of 60–80% in patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the CD33 targeting gemtuzumab ozogamicin has demonstrated modest improvements in survival and is the only ADC currently licensed in the United States for pediatric patients with de novo AML. Several other ADCs have been developed and tested clinically for leukemia but have achieved limited success to date. The search for additional leukemia-specific targets and optimization of ADC structure and specificity are ongoing efforts to improve their therapeutic window. This review provides a comprehensive overview of ADCs in acute leukemias, with a focus on pediatric ALL and AML. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease, and recent advances in sequencing technology have revealed that the accumulation of various genetic abnormalities is deeply involved in the pathogenesis of AML and its clonal evolutions during disease progression. Prognostic classifications and therapeutic strategies based on the cytogenetic and genetic abnormalities have been proposed, and several new therapeutic agents targeting the molecular abnormalities have been energetically investigated to eliminate AML cells. In the last few years, several new agents, including FLT3, IDH, BCL-2, and Hedgehog inhibitors, have been approved for the treatment of newly diagnosed AML, and their clinical applications have begun in the United States. Although there has been a delay of several years, the clinical development of these new agents is also underway in Japan, and it is expected that a new era of AML treatment will begin in the near future. It is necessary to establish novel risk-adopted treatment strategies incorporating these agents in monotherapies and/or effectively designed combination therapies.

Introduction : Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a deadly disease associated with poor outcomes. For over four decades, therapeutic options for AML were limited to high dose cytotoxic chemotherapy. Scientific breakthroughs have not only enhanced our understanding of the molecular underpinnings of this disease but also resulted in the development of several targeted therapies with superior efficacy and lesser toxicities than conventional chemotherapy. The FDA approval of small molecule inhibitors for specific AML subsets highlights the importance of genetic and molecular profiling to optimally personalize AML therapy in the modern era. Areas covered : In this article, we review the medical literature from PubMed on recent FDA approved drugs for AML by their mechanism of action: small molecule inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugate, cytotoxic, and epigenetic agents. We describe how to incorporate these agents into the current treatment paradigm for specific AML patients. Expert opinion : Knowing the molecular characteristics of patients with AML is of utmost importance to plan the best management. There are promising drugs targeting leukemogenesis by various mechanisms. It is important to consider clinical trial options for patients if and when available. We have provided a brief overview of the most promising agents on the horizon for AML therapy.

In recent years, several drugs-including midostaurin, gilteritinib, and gemtuzumab ozogamicin, to name a few-have been approved or reapproved in the United States to treat patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Yet survival rates for younger patients had improved with chemotherapy alone even before the approvals of these new agents. This begs the question whether the new therapies will actually have a positive impact on survival. The 5-year survival rate for older patients has also risen, again without the addition of these new agents. The challenge will be to incorporate new therapies and use them where they will have the greatest impact-major work for clinicians and researchers alike., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

The FLT3 inhibitor midostaurin, the antibody-drug conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin, CPX-351 (liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine), and the IDH2 inhibitor enasidenib are among the novel agents approved for use in the clinic this past year. This year, 2018, already has seen the regulatory approval of the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax in the form of breakthrough designation and the IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib received full FDA approval. Much remains to be learned about how best to use these drugs to improve patient outcomes and how best to employ and interpret next-generation sequencing to determine measurable residual disease (MRD) levels that can more accurately predict risk of relapse., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

In September 2017, the US FDA announced re-approval of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), a CD33-targeting immunoconjugate, for treatment of newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This is a very significant step toward defining new treatment regimens in AML, as the treatment has essentially stayed unchanged with the '7 + 3 induction regimen' (7 days cytarabine and 3 days of anthracycline) since 1973. GO is the first antibody-drug conjugate to receive FDA approval for treating cancer. This review article discusses the challenges faced and lessons learned during the journey of GO for AML treatment. Selected trials that have made significant contribution in our understanding of the most efficacious and safe use of GO for treating AML patients as well as factors influencing GO response are highlighted in this article.

Aim: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with high disease burden. This analysis estimated HRU and costs among newly diagnosed AML patients in a US commercially insured population., Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective observational study using the IMS Health PharMetrics Plus and Hospital Charge Detail Master databases. Patients included adults who were newly diagnosed with AML between January 2007 and June 2016 ("study period"). Patients with <12 months of continuous enrollment prior to the index date were excluded, as were those whose first diagnosis was AML in remission/relapse, those diagnosed with acute promyelocytic leukemia, those on Medicare supplemental insurance, or those with a diagnosis of AML in remission/relapse without evidence of treatment during the study period. Patients were stratified by receipt of AML treatment (chemotherapy/hematopoietic cell transplantation [HCT]), and their follow-up was partitioned into initial, remission, and relapsed health states. Mean HRU and costs were tallied by treatment and, for treated patients, by health state and time since entry into health state (≤6 vs >6 months)., Results: A total of 9,455 patients met study criteria, including 6,415 (68%) treated and 3,040 (32%) untreated patients, with mean follow-up of 18.3 and 16.4 months, respectively. Mean age was 55 years in treated patients and 60 years in untreated patients. Mean total costs per patient were $386,077 in treated patients and $79,382 in untreated patients. For treated patients, 60% of total costs ($231,867 per patient) were incurred during the initial health state, representing time without remission/relapse. Mean monthly total healthcare costs were $21,055 and $4,854 among treated and untreated patients, respectively., Limitations and Conclusions: HRU and costs of managing AML patients are substantial. In treated patients, the majority of costs were incurred during the initial treatment period, without claims indicating remission/relapse.

Prognosis for patients with AML remains dismal. Despite multiple clinical trials across several decades, little improvement for the therapy of non-APL AML was noted. However, over the last couple of years, several new therapies have demonstrated efficacy in the therapy of patients with AML. Several of those have been approved by the FDA for AML therapy. These include CPX-351, midostaurin, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, enasidenib and ivosidenib. Our goal in this review is to summarize currently available data on these new therapies and discuss the rapidly evolving treatment landscape of AML., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The MDS-IWG and NCCN currently endorse both FAB and WHO classifications of MDS and AML, thus allowing patients with 20-30 % bone marrow blasts (AML20-30, formerly MDS-RAEB-t) to be categorised and treated as either MDS or AML. In addition, an artificial distinction between AML20-30 and AML30+ was made by regulatory agencies by initially restricting approval of azacitidine to AML20-30. Thus, uncertainty prevails regarding the diagnosis, prognosis and optimal treatment timing and strategy for patients with AML20-30. Here, we aim to provide clarification for patients treated with azacitidine front-line., Methods: The Austrian Azacitidine Registry is a multicentre database (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01595295). For this analysis, we selected 339 patients treated with azacitidine front-line. According to the WHO classification 53, 96 and 190 patients had MDS-RAEB-I, MDS-RAEB-II and AML (AML20-30: n = 79; AML30+: n = 111), respectively. According to the FAB classification, 131, 101 and 111 patients had MDS-RAEB, MDS-RAEB-t and AML, respectively., Results: The median ages of patients with MDS and AML were 72 (range 37-87) and 77 (range 23-93) years, respectively. Overall, 80 % of classifiable patients (≤30 % bone marrow blasts) had intermediate-2 or high-risk IPSS scores. Most other baseline, treatment and response characteristics were similar between patients diagnosed with MDS or AML. WHO-classified patients with AML20-30 had significantly worse OS than patients with MDS-RAEB-II (13.1 vs 18.9 months; p = 0.010), but similar OS to patients with AML30+ (10.9 vs 13.1 months; p = 0.238). AML patients that showed MDS-related features did not have worse outcomes compared with patients who did not (13.2 vs 8.9 months; p = 0.104). FAB-classified patients with MDS-RAEB-t had similar survival to patients with AML30+ (12.8 vs 10.9 months; p = 0.376), but significantly worse OS than patients with MDS-RAEB (10.9 vs 24.4 months; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Our data demonstrate the validity of the WHO classification of MDS and AML, and its superiority over the former FAB classification, for patients treated with azacitidine front-line. Neither bone marrow blast count nor presence of MDS-related features had an adverse prognostic impact on survival. Patients with AML20-30 should therefore be regarded as having 'true AML' and in our opinion treatment should be initiated without delay.

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common type of acute leukemia in adults. Long-term survivors from AML may be at higher risk of second primary malignancies., Patients and Methods: We selected adult patients with AML aged≥18 years from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End RESULTS (SEER 13) database. We used the multiple primary standardized incidence ratio session of SEER*stat software to calculate the risk of second primary malignancies in patients with AML., Results: Among 5,091 patients, 148 patients developed a total of 160 second primary malignancies, with an observed/expected (O/E) ratio of 1.17, (95% confidence interval=0.99-1.36), and an excess risk of 15.47 per 10,000 population. The risk of all-site cancer, cancer of gastrointestinal system, and oral and pharyngeal cancer in different age groups was found to be significantly higher among patients with AML compared to that of general US population., Conclusion: Adult patients with AML have a significantly higher risk of second primary malignancies compared to the general population., (Copyright© 2014 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved.)

Background: Anthracycline agents are used for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) but may cause late-onset cardiomyopathy. Current frontline therapy for AML in North America, as reflected in the approach of the Children's Oncology Group (COG) and other pediatric consortia, is adapted from the anthracyline-intensive Medical Research Council (MRC) regimen. The purpose of this study was to describe early post-treatment cardiac function as a potential indicator of acute and long-term risk associated with this approach., Procedure: A multi-center retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of AML survivors diagnosed from 2004 to 2009 and treated with MRC-based regimens. Change in left ventricular shortening fraction (LVSF) on echocardiogram was determined from baseline to latest post-treatment/pre-relapse value; associations with potential predictors were examined., Results: This cohort of pediatric survivors (n = 52) was assessed at a median interval of 13 months from end of treatment. Mean cumulative anthracycline dose was 339 ± 14 mg/m(2) . Mean baseline and post-treatment LVSF were 39.3 ± 0.8% and 35.4 ± 0.9%, respectively; mean percent change for individuals was -8.4 ± 2.8% (P < 0.001). Cardiac-directed medications were initiated in four patients (7.7%). Decline in LVSF was significantly associated with cumulative anthracycline dose, increasing BMI and Hispanic ethnicity., Conclusion: Early, significant decline in LVSF was observed following treatment with these MRC-based regimens. Elevated BMI and Hispanic ethnicity were identified as new independent risk factors. Children and adolescents so treated are at substantial risk for late-onset cardiomyopathy, require monitoring with annual echocardiogram per current COG survivorship guidelines, and are good candidates for appropriate cardioprotection strategies., (Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)