Search

Infertility, defined as the inability to conceive within 1 year of unprotected intercourse, affects an estimated 80 million individuals worldwide, or 10-15% of couples of reproductive age. Assisted reproductive technology includes all infertility treatments to achieve conception; in vitro fertilization is the process by which an oocyte is fertilized by semen outside the body; non-in vitro fertilization assisted reproductive technology treatments include ovulation induction, artificial insemination, and intrauterine insemination. Use of assisted reproductive technology has risen steadily in the United States during the past 2 decades due to several reasons, including childbearing at older maternal ages and increasing insurance coverage. The number of in vitro fertilization cycles in the United States has nearly doubled from 2000 through 2013 and currently 1.7% of all live births in the United States are the result of this technology. Since the birth of the first child from in vitro fertilization >35 years ago, >5 million babies have been born from in vitro fertilization, half within the past 6 years. It is estimated that 1% of singletons, 19% of twins, and 25% of triplet or higher multiples are due to in vitro fertilization, and 4%, 21%, and 52%, respectively, are due to non-in vitro fertilization assisted reproductive technology. Higher plurality at birth results in a >10-fold increase in the risks for prematurity and low birthweight in twins vs singletons (adjusted odds ratio, 11.84; 95% confidence interval, 10.56-13.27 and adjusted odds ratio, 10.68; 95% confidence interval, 9.45-12.08, respectively). The use of donor oocytes is associated with increased risks for pregnancy-induced hypertension (adjusted odds ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.78) and prematurity (adjusted odds ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.83). The use of thawed embryos is associated with higher risks for pregnancy-induced hypertension (adjusted odds ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.57) and large-for-gestation birthweight (adjusted odds ratio, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-2.08). Among singletons, in vitro fertilization is associated with increased risk of severe maternal morbidity compared with fertile deliveries (vaginal: adjusted odds ratio, 2.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-2.88; cesarean: adjusted odds ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-1.98, respectively) and subfertile deliveries (vaginal: adjusted odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-3.00; cesarean: adjusted odds ratio, 1.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-2.35, respectively). Among twins, cesarean in vitro fertilization deliveries have significantly greater severe maternal morbidity compared to cesarean fertile deliveries (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.93). Subfertility, with or without in vitro fertilization or non-in vitro fertilization infertility treatments to achieve a pregnancy, is associated with increased risks of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. The major risk from in vitro fertilization treatments of multiple births (and the associated excess of perinatal morbidity) has been reduced over time, with fewer and better-quality embryos being transferred. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To investigate the impact of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and assisted hatching (AH) on assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes in initial cycles with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) as the primary diagnosis. Design Retrospective cohort study of cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) Clinic Outcome Reporting System database. Setting Not applicable. Patient(s) A total of 422,949 fresh, nondonor, initial ART cycles of which 8,597 were diagnosed with only elevated FSH and 38,926 were diagnosed with only DOR according to the SART DOR categorization. Intervention(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) Live birth and clinical pregnancy rates. Result(s) ICSI and AH were associated with diminished odds of live birth in SART DOR–only cycles (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81–0.96 for ICSI; AOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.71–0.84 for AH). No association between odds of live birth and either ICSI or AH in elevated FSH–only cycles was observed. The combination of ICSI and AH was associated with significantly lower odds of live birth in SART DOR–only cycles but not in elevated FSH–only cycles. Conclusion(s) In initial ART cycles for which the only indication relates to a diagnosis of DOR, AH and ICSI are not associated with improved live birth rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess trends and outcomes of assisted hatching among assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles., Design: Retrospective cohort analysis using National ART Surveillance System (NASS) data., Setting: U.S. fertility centers reporting to NASS., Patient(s): Fresh autologous noncanceled ART cycles conducted from 2000-2010., Intervention(s): None., Main Outcome Measure(s): Implantation, clinical pregnancy, live-birth, miscarriage, multiple gestation., Result(s): Assisted hatching use statistically significantly increased in absolute number (from 25,724 to 35,518 cycles), percentages of day-3 (from 50.7% to 56.3%) and day-5 transfers (from 15.9% to 22.8%), and percentage of transfers among women ≥38 years (from 17.8% to 21.8%) or women with ≥2 prior ART cycles and no live birth(s) (from 4.3% to 7.4%). Both day-3 and day-5 cycles involving assisted hatching were associated with lower odds of implantation (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] 0.7 and 0.6, respectively), clinical pregnancy (aOR 0.8 and 0.7, respectively), live birth (aOR 0.8 and 0.7, respectively), and increased odds of miscarriage (aOR 1.4 and 1.4, respectively), as compared with cycles without assisted hatching. Assisted hatching was associated with lower odds of multiple gestation in day-5 cycles (aOR 0.8). In cycles for women with a "poor prognosis," the association of assisted hatching with pregnancy outcomes was not statistically significant., Conclusion(s): Assisted hatching use had an increasing trend but was not associated with improved pregnancy outcomes, even in poor-prognosis patients. Prospective studies are needed to identify the patients who may benefit from assisted hatching., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)