Search

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine changes in screening and performance of invasive diagnostic procedures for Down syndrome between 2001 and 2007. Study Design: The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine members completed a survey in 2007 regarding screening tests and diagnostic procedures for Down syndrome. With the use of descriptive statistics, the χ2 test, and the Student t test, responses from 2007 were compared with responses from a similar 2001 survey. Results: Performance of first-trimester screening more than doubled from 2001-2007 (43.1% in 2001, 97.3% in 2007; P < .0001). Between 2001 and 2007, the use of the quad screen increased 10-fold (8.5% in 2001, 85.6% in 2007; P < .0001). There was an estimated 20% decrease in invasive diagnostic procedures that were performed in risk-positive women (53.7% in 2001, 34.2% in 2007; P < .0001). In 2007, the average fetal loss rates that were quoted by maternal-fetal medicine specialists after chorionic villous sampling was 1:160 and after an amniocentesis was 1:493. Conclusion: Down syndrome screening evolved from 2001-2007, with an increasing emphasis on first-trimester screening. With more efficacious screening, the number of invasive procedures has declined. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

This month we focus on current research in pregnancy spacing. Dr. Campbell discusses five recent publications, and each is concluded with a "bottom line" that is the take-home message. The complete reference for each can be found in on this page, along with direct links to the abstracts.

Objective: To estimate the impact of the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) weight gain recommendations on perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies., Methods: In this multicenter cohort study, using the 2009 IOM guidelines, we examined pregnancy outcomes in 570 uncomplicated diamniotic twin pregnancies. Subjects were grouped according to pre-pregnancy body mass index. Perinatal outcomes were assessed based on whether maternal weekly weight gain was less than, at, or in excess of the recommended IOM guidelines., Results: In women with a normal pre-pregnancy BMI, patients whose weight gain met the IOM recommendations had a significantly higher mean gestational age at delivery; less prematurity and larger birth weight infants compared to women whose weekly weight gain was less or excess than the recommended IOM guidelines. Similarly, when compared with their low weight gain counterparts, overweight women with appropriate weight gain had improved outcomes including higher mean gestational age at delivery, higher birth weight infants and less prematurity. In obese women, the amount of pregnancy weight gain did not impact perinatal outcomes., Conclusion: Our results confirm that weekly maternal weight gain according to the IOM guidelines results in improved outcomes in twin pregnancies. Importantly, women with a normal or overweight pre-pregnancy BMI whose weekly weight gain was less than recommended, had increased risks of prematurity and lower birth weight infants. Similarly, women with a normal pre-pregnancy BMI whose weekly weight gain was excess than recommended had increased risks of prematurity and lower birth weight infants.

Unlabelled: There is paucity of data regarding tick-borne diseases during pregnancy. Here, we report a case of human granulocytic anaplasmosis during pregnancy with successful treatment and a favorable neonatal outcome. We also review diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of published case reports from 1983 to 2010 of human granulocytic anaplasmosis, Lyme disease, babesiosis, and human monocytic ehrlichiosis in the United States., Target Audience: Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Family Physicians., Learning Objectives: After the completing the CME activity, physicians should be better able to diagnose tick-born diseases, implement best treatment options during the pregnancy, and assess the neonatal outcomes.

Objective: The normal male to female livebirth sex ratio ranges from 1.03 to 1.07. Higher ratios in China, India and Korea reflect prenatal sex selection. We reviewed sex ratios for US births to investigate potential prenatal sex selection., Methods: We reviewed all US livebirths from 1975 to 2002 using National Center for Health Statistics birth certificates in 4-year intervals. We compared the sex ratios of Blacks, Chinese, Filipinos, Asian Indians and Koreans relative to Whites. We also compared the sex ratios by birth order for first, second and third and more births (third+) from 1991 to 2002., Results: The male to female sex ratio from 1975 to 2002 was 1.053 for Whites, 1.030 (p < 0.01) for Blacks, 1.074 (p < 0.01) for Chinese and 1.073 (p < 0.01) for Filipinos. From 1991 to 2002, the sex ratio increased from 1.071 to 1.086 for Chinese, 1.060 to 1.074 for Filipinos, 1.043 to 1.087 for Asian Indians and 1.069 to 1.088 for Koreans. The highest sex ratios were seen for third+ births to Asian Indians (1.126), Chinese (1.111) and Koreans (1.109)., Conclusion: The male to female livebirth sex ratio in the United States exceeded expected biological variation for third+ births to Chinese, Asian Indians and Koreans strongly suggesting prenatal sex selection., (Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Objective: To explore demographic differences in Down syndrome livebirths in the United States., Methods: Using National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) birth certificate data from 1989 to 2006 we analyzed Down syndrome livebirths after correcting for under-reporting. We created six subsets based on maternal age (15-34 and 35-49 years old); US regions, that is, Northeast, Midwest, South and West; marital status, (married, unmarried); education, ( ≤ 12 years, ≥ 13 years); race, (white, black); and Hispanic ethnicity, (non-Hispanic, Hispanic). We estimated expected Down syndrome livebirths assuming no change in birth certificate reporting. The percentage of expected Down syndrome livebirths actually born was calculated by year., Results: There were 72 613 424 livebirths from 1989 to 2006. There were 122 519 Down syndrome livebirths expected and 65 492 were actually born. The Midwest had the most expected Down syndrome livebirths actually born (67.6%); the West was lowest (44.4%). More expected Down syndrome livebirths were born to women who were 15 to 34 years old (61 vs 43.8%) and to those with ≤ 12 years education (60.4 vs 46.9%), white race (56.6 vs 37%), unmarried (56.0 vs 52.5%), and of Hispanic ethnicity (55.0 vs 53.3%)., Conclusion: The percentage of expected Down syndrome livebirths actually born varies by demographics., (Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)