Search

Unlabelled: BMD is a primary predictor of osteoporotic fracture, and its genetic determination is still unclear. This study showed that the correlation between BMD at different skeletal sites is caused by an underlying genetic structure of common genetic effects. In addition to possible shared (pleiotropic) genetic and environmental effects, each of the BMD variables may also be determined by site-specific genetic factors., Introduction: BMD is a primary predictor of osteoporotic fracture and a key phenotype for the genetic study of osteoporosis. The interindividual variation in BMD measured at a given skeletal site is largely regulated by genetic factors. A strong phenotypic covariation exists for BMD at different skeletal sites. This study tests the hypothesis that the covariation is in fact caused by an underlying genetic structure of common genetic effects and that, in addition to possible shared (pleiotropic) genetic effects, each of the BMD variables may also be determined by site-specific genetic factors, Materials and Methods: A bivariate complex segregation analysis as implemented in statistical package PAP was conducted to explore various models of pleiotropic genetic and environmental transmission in lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD, as well as in compact and spongious segments of hand phalanges. The BMD was obtained in three ethnically, culturally, and socially heterogeneous samples of white pedigrees, with 2549 individuals between 18 and 100 years of age, from Australia, Europe, and North America., Results and Conclusions: The genetic correlation between BMD measures ranged between 0.50 +/- 0.09 and 0.79 +/- 0.04 in the three samples. In each sample, the model incorporated a major locus pleiotropic effect, and residual correlation was found to be the most parsimonious model. Estimated parameters from the model indicated a significant pleiotropic major gene effect on both lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD, with the existence of a significant residual correlation (0.51 +/- 0.07 to 0.66 +/- 0.04). These results suggest that the covariation in BMD at different skeletal sites, and between mostly compact versus mostly trabecular bone, was largely determined by common genetic factors that are pleiotropic or in close linkage and linkage disequilibirum, while at the same time, exhibiting considerable evidence of shared environmental effects. The results, for the first time, suggest that the possibility of pleiotropic genetic effect may be controlled by a major genetic locus. Identification of the major locus could open new opportunity to understanding the liability and pathogenic processes in which they are involved in the determination of fracture risk., (Copyright 2004 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research)

Bone density measurements are currently being performed throughout the world in the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis as well as in research into this major health problem. However, it is not clear to what extent bone mineral density (BMD) values determined by dual-photon absorptiometry at one center can be applied to another. This is particularly relevant for the quantitative comparison of results from studies carried out in different laboratories. Furthermore, many centers now acquiring densitometers may not have the resources to determine their own normal range, relying instead on a "normal" range provided by the manufacturer. The question of the comparability of BMD data obtained in different centers was examined by comparing the normal range for the lumbar spine and proximal femur in 203 normal white Australian women and 892 normal white U.S. women, obtained using the same model densitometer. The two populations were compared according to decade. From superimposition of the Australian individual values on the North American normal ranges, only minor differences between the two populations were seen at any of the sites measured at any decade. None of these minor differences were statistically significant. This study shows a close similarity between BMD values in both the proximal femur and lumbar spine in normal white women in Australia and North America, provided the same model densitometer is used. Thus data obtained from different centers in populations with similar ethnic composition may be compared directly. These findings provide for the first time a sound basis for the quantitative comparison of the at times conflicting studies carried out in widely differing settings around the world.